SPECIA Wednesday Eve Session June 5, 2013
Scores after  7 rounds  Average:   42.0      Section  C
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  5   62.50   52.50  C   1     1     1    0.70(A)  Nancy Jones - Marge Field
  2   61.90   52.00  C   2     2     2    0.49(A)  Marilyn J. Kendall - Ruby Buttereck
 10   54.17   45.50  C   3     3          0.35(A)  Bill Burns - Bonnie Burns
  4   53.57   45.00  B   4                0.25(A)  Joyce Aiken - Jane Willson
  8   50.00   42.00  C                             Ash Ramadan - Suzanne Sobenes
  6   47.62   40.00  A                             JoAnn Huebner - Donna Miller
  1   44.64   37.50  A                             Andrew Graves - Robert Cherry
  3   44.64   37.50  A                             Rhonda Hampton - Linda Mackenzie
  7   40.48   34.00  B                             Carol Smith - Jane A. McCoy
  9   40.48   34.00  C                             Don Austin - S Austin

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
4
10 9 3
A Q J 4
Q J 8 5 4
A K Q J 10 7 5
K 8
2
K 7 3
N
WE
S
8 3 2
A 6 5 4 2
K 9 8
A 6
10
16    11
3
9 6
Q J 7
10 7 6 5 3
10 9 2

EW 6N; EW 6♠; EW 5; EW 1; EW 1♣; Par −990

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠W A64802.501.502-Kendall-Buttereck vs 3-Hampton-Mackenzie
4 ♠W♣ 464802.501.506-Huebner-Miller vs 8-Ramadan-Sobenes
4 ♠W A64802.501.507-Smith-McCoy vs 5-Jones-Field
4 ♠W A64802.501.5010-Burns-Burns vs 1-Graves-Cherry
4 ♠W Q75100.004.009-Austin-Austin vs 4-Aiken-Willson

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
K Q 9 8 4 2
Q J
J 7 5 4 3
A 8 6
10 5
10 9 7 5
A K Q 10
N
WE
S
K J 9 5 4
A J 7 6
K
9 8 6
9
13    12
6
Q 10 7 3 2
3
A 8 6 4 3 2
2

EW 4N; EW 4♠; EW 3♣; EW 2; EW 1; Par −430

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠E A−31504.000.006-Huebner-Miller vs 8-Ramadan-Sobenes
4 ♠E 3−21002.501.507-Smith-McCoy vs 5-Jones-Field
4 ♠E♣ 2−21002.501.5010-Burns-Burns vs 1-Graves-Cherry
4 ♠E A−1501.003.002-Kendall-Buttereck vs 3-Hampton-Mackenzie
3 ♠E♣ 231400.004.009-Austin-Austin vs 4-Aiken-Willson

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
K Q J
K Q J 7
A J 6 5
K 8
9 5 2
A 9 4 3 2
K 7 2
A 2
N
WE
S
10 8 7 3
8
Q 8 3
J 10 9 7 4
20
11    3
6
A 6 4
10 6 5
10 9 4
Q 6 5 3

NS 4N; NS 3; NS 2; NS 2♣; NS 1♠; Par +430

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS 344304.000.002-Kendall-Buttereck vs 3-Hampton-Mackenzie
3 NTN♣ J34002.501.509-Austin-Austin vs 4-Aiken-Willson
3 NTN♣ J34002.501.5010-Burns-Burns vs 1-Graves-Cherry
2 NTN 841801.003.006-Huebner-Miller vs 8-Ramadan-Sobenes
3 NTN♣ 7−1500.004.007-Smith-McCoy vs 5-Jones-Field

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
5 4
K J 10 3
10 6 2
A 7 3 2
K J 7 2
8 6 4
Q J 9 3
10 6
N
WE
S
A Q 10 8 6
Q 7
A K 7 4
J 8
8
7    16
9
9 3
A 9 5 2
8 5
K Q 9 5 4

EW 3♠; NS 3; EW 3; NS 3♣; Par −140

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠E♣ 4−11003.500.501-Graves-Cherry vs 6-Huebner-Miller
4 ♠E 8−11003.500.507-Smith-McCoy vs 8-Ramadan-Sobenes
3 ♠E A31401.003.003-Hampton-Mackenzie vs 4-Aiken-Willson
3 ♠E 831401.003.009-Austin-Austin vs 5-Jones-Field
3 ♠E♣ K31401.003.0010-Burns-Burns vs 2-Kendall-Buttereck

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
K
K Q 5
A J 10 6 2
J 6 4 3
A Q 10 8 3
2
K Q 5
Q 8 5 2
N
WE
S
9 6 5 2
10 9 7 4 3
8 7
K 9
14
13    3
10
J 7 4
A J 8 6
9 4 3
A 10 7

NS 4; NS 2N; EW 2♠; NS 2; NS 2♣; Par +130

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N♠ 241304.000.009-Austin-Austin vs 5-Jones-Field
2 N♠ 22903.001.0010-Burns-Burns vs 2-Kendall-Buttereck
3 ♠W 5−1502.002.007-Smith-McCoy vs 8-Ramadan-Sobenes
2 NTS♠ A−11001.003.003-Hampton-Mackenzie vs 4-Aiken-Willson
3 S K−22000.004.001-Graves-Cherry vs 6-Huebner-Miller

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
A 9 8 4 2
A
4 3
A K Q J 5
10
4 3 2
A K J 10 6 5 2
10 3
N
WE
S
K J 6
K 9 7 5
Q 9 8
9 6 2
18
8    9
5
Q 7 5 3
Q J 10 8 6
7
8 7 4

NS 5♠; N 5♣; S 4♣; EW 3; NS 1; Par +450

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ×W A−25004.000.003-Hampton-Mackenzie vs 4-Aiken-Willson
3 ♠N 841703.001.007-Smith-McCoy vs 8-Ramadan-Sobenes
4 ♣N 851502.002.001-Graves-Cherry vs 6-Huebner-Miller
4 ♣N Q41301.003.009-Austin-Austin vs 5-Jones-Field
4 ♣N 8−1500.004.0010-Burns-Burns vs 2-Kendall-Buttereck

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
K 7 2
K 3
A 6 5
A 7 5 4 3
J 9
A Q J 2
K J 8 2
K J 9
N
WE
S
10 6 5 3
10 8 6 5
Q 10 9 7 3
14
16    2
8
A Q 8 4
9 7 4
4
Q 10 8 6 2

NS 4♣; NS 2♠; NS 1N; EW 2; EW 1; Par +130

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♣×N Q47104.000.0010-Burns-Burns vs 3-Hampton-Mackenzie
3 ♣N Q41302.002.002-Kendall-Buttereck vs 7-Smith-McCoy
2 ♣N 741302.002.004-Aiken-Willson vs 5-Jones-Field
3 ♣N Q41302.002.008-Ramadan-Sobenes vs 1-Graves-Cherry
1 NTW♣ 41900.004.009-Austin-Austin vs 6-Huebner-Miller

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
K Q 9 6 4
4
Q J 10 6
Q 8 2
5 2
K 10 9 6
K 8 7 5 3
K 10
N
WE
S
J 8 7
A Q J 8 7 3
4
A J 9
10
9    13
8
A 10 3
5 2
A 9 2
7 6 5 4 3

EW 4; NS 2♠; EW 1N; S 2♣; EW 1; N 1♣; Par −300: NS 4♠×−2

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠N 431404.000.002-Kendall-Buttereck vs 7-Smith-McCoy
2 E♣ 741703.001.008-Ramadan-Sobenes vs 1-Graves-Cherry
4 E♣ 744201.502.509-Austin-Austin vs 6-Huebner-Miller
4 E♠ A44201.502.5010-Burns-Burns vs 3-Hampton-Mackenzie
4 E♠ A54500.004.004-Aiken-Willson vs 5-Jones-Field

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
Q 8 7 5 4
K
6 3 2
10 9 6 5
A 9
Q 8 7 5 3
10 7 4
J 7 2
N
WE
S
10 6 3
A J 10
A Q 9 5
Q 8 4
5
7    13
15
K J 2
9 6 4 2
K J 8
A K 3

NS 2♠; EW 2; NS 1♣; Par +110

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W♣ 10−22004.000.002-Kendall-Buttereck vs 7-Smith-McCoy
2 ♠S 521103.001.009-Austin-Austin vs 6-Huebner-Miller
2 ♠S 4−1502.002.008-Ramadan-Sobenes vs 1-Graves-Cherry
2 W♣ 521100.503.504-Aiken-Willson vs 5-Jones-Field
2 W♣ 521100.503.5010-Burns-Burns vs 3-Hampton-Mackenzie

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
J 10 7 4 3
K 8
J 7 6
J 9 6
A Q 8
10 6 2
A Q 4
A 8 5 2
N
WE
S
9 6 5
9 7 5 4
9 8 2
Q 10 7
6
16    2
16
K 2
A Q J 3
K 10 5 3
K 4 3

NS 2♠; EW 1N; S 2; S 1; N 1; EW 1♣; Par +110

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠S♣ 221104.000.003-Hampton-Mackenzie vs 1-Graves-Cherry
2 ♠S A−11002.501.505-Jones-Field vs 6-Huebner-Miller
2 ♠S 10−11002.501.507-Smith-McCoy vs 9-Austin-Austin
3 S♣ A−22000.503.508-Ramadan-Sobenes vs 2-Kendall-Buttereck
2 ♠S 2−22000.503.5010-Burns-Burns vs 4-Aiken-Willson

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
A 10 3
K 5
A K 8 4 2
J 10 3
J 6 5
Q 10 7 4 3
K 8 6 5 4
N
WE
S
K Q 8 7
8 6
10 7 6 5
A Q 2
15
6    11
8
9 4 2
A J 9 2
Q J 9 3
9 7

NS 2N; NS 3; EW 3♣; EW 1♠; EW 1; Par +100: EW 4♣×−1

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTN♠ 721203.500.507-Smith-McCoy vs 9-Austin-Austin
2 NTN♠ 721203.500.5010-Burns-Burns vs 4-Aiken-Willson
3 N 831102.002.008-Ramadan-Sobenes vs 2-Kendall-Buttereck
2 NTN♠ 7−1501.003.005-Jones-Field vs 6-Huebner-Miller
3 NTN♠ K−21000.004.003-Hampton-Mackenzie vs 1-Graves-Cherry

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
10
A K J 10 7 3
J 3
K Q 8 3
K 8 5
Q 8 6 4
K 9 5
A 9 4
N
WE
S
A 9 3
A 7 6 4 2
J 10 6 5 2
14
12    9
5
Q J 7 6 4 2
9 5 2
Q 10 8
7

N 3; EW 4; S 2; EW 3♣; W 1N; EW 1♠; Par −130

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N♣ 646204.000.005-Jones-Field vs 6-Huebner-Miller
5 ♣×W A−35003.001.0010-Burns-Burns vs 4-Aiken-Willson
2 N♣ J31402.002.003-Hampton-Mackenzie vs 1-Graves-Cherry
1 N♣ J1801.003.007-Smith-McCoy vs 9-Austin-Austin
3 N♣ J−11000.004.008-Ramadan-Sobenes vs 2-Kendall-Buttereck

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
Q J 9 4 3
A Q 7 4
J 10
6 5
K 8 7
J
A 2
A K Q J 8 4 2
N
WE
S
10 6 2
10 9 8 5
Q 8 7 5
10 7
10
18    2
10
A 5
K 6 3 2
K 9 6 4 3
9 3

EW 2N; NS 2♠; NS 2; EW 3♣; NS 1; Par −120

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♣×W J−25004.000.004-Aiken-Willson vs 2-Kendall-Buttereck
3 ♣W♠ 431102.501.501-Graves-Cherry vs 9-Austin-Austin
3 ♣W 1031102.501.506-Huebner-Miller vs 7-Smith-McCoy
3 ♣W J41300.503.503-Hampton-Mackenzie vs 8-Ramadan-Sobenes
4 ♣W A41300.503.5010-Burns-Burns vs 5-Jones-Field

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
10 8 6
10 9 6 4
J 6 4
9 7 3
A Q 9 5 4 3
J 7
A K 9 7
4
N
WE
S
K 2
K 8 5
Q 5 3
A K J 8 5
1
14    16
9
J 7
A Q 3 2
10 8 2
Q 10 6 2

E 6N; E 6♠; E 6; W 5N; W 5♠; W 5; EW 3; E 4♣; W 3♣; Par −990

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♠W 454503.500.501-Graves-Cherry vs 9-Austin-Austin
4 ♠W 1054503.500.504-Aiken-Willson vs 2-Kendall-Buttereck
5 ♠W♣ 964801.003.003-Hampton-Mackenzie vs 8-Ramadan-Sobenes
4 ♠E 864801.003.006-Huebner-Miller vs 7-Smith-McCoy
4 ♠W 464801.003.0010-Burns-Burns vs 5-Jones-Field

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
10 7 2
K 6 3 2
Q 8 6
A 7 6
A 9 5
A 9 8 4
9 7 5 4
Q 5
N
WE
S
6 4 3
Q 10 7 5
K J 3
10 8 4
9
10    6
15
K Q J 8
J
A 10 2
K J 9 3 2

NS 4♠; NS 3N; NS 4♣; NS 2; NS 1; Par +620

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN 536003.500.504-Aiken-Willson vs 2-Kendall-Buttereck
3 NTN♠ 336003.500.506-Huebner-Miller vs 7-Smith-McCoy
1 NTN 541802.002.003-Hampton-Mackenzie vs 8-Ramadan-Sobenes
1 NTS 41901.003.001-Graves-Cherry vs 9-Austin-Austin
3 NTN 3−22000.004.0010-Burns-Burns vs 5-Jones-Field

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
9 8 6 5
J 4
A 8 2
Q 10 5 4
K 10 4
10 8 6
Q J 10 6 4
3 2
N
WE
S
A J 7 3
A Q 9 5 3
K
A 8 7
7
6    18
9
Q 2
K 7 2
9 7 5 3
K J 9 6

EW 4♠; EW 4; EW 3N; EW 3; EW 1♣; Par −620

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E♣ 9−11004.000.002-Kendall-Buttereck vs 9-Austin-Austin
3 E 341702.501.505-Jones-Field vs 3-Hampton-Mackenzie
3 E♠ Q41702.501.5010-Burns-Burns vs 6-Huebner-Miller
4 E♣ 646200.503.504-Aiken-Willson vs 8-Ramadan-Sobenes
4 E♠ Q46200.503.507-Smith-McCoy vs 1-Graves-Cherry

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
J 7 6 5 4
A K 9
A
J 8 3 2
Q
Q J 7 3
7 4 2
K 9 6 5 4
N
WE
S
K 3
10 8 5 4 2
K Q 10 8 6 5
13
8    8
11
A 10 9 8 2
6
J 9 3
A Q 10 7

NS 5♠; NS 4♣; EW 2; NS 1N; EW 2; Par +450

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N K54502.002.002-Kendall-Buttereck vs 9-Austin-Austin
4 ♠N 1054502.002.004-Aiken-Willson vs 8-Ramadan-Sobenes
4 ♠N 854502.002.005-Jones-Field vs 3-Hampton-Mackenzie
4 ♠N K54502.002.007-Smith-McCoy vs 1-Graves-Cherry
4 ♠N K54502.002.0010-Burns-Burns vs 6-Huebner-Miller

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
6 3
J 10 7 3 2
8 4
9 8 6 2
J 5 2
K Q 6
Q 9 6 2
A K 10
N
WE
S
K 9 8 7
9 5 4
A J 5
J 5 4
1
15    9
15
A Q 10 4
A 8
K 10 7 3
Q 7 3

E 3N; W 2N; E 2♠; E 2; E 2♣; W 1♠; NS 1; W 1; W 1♣; Par −400

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S♣ A21104.000.0010-Burns-Burns vs 6-Huebner-Miller
3 ♠E A−21003.001.007-Smith-McCoy vs 1-Graves-Cherry
2 S♣ A−11002.002.005-Jones-Field vs 3-Hampton-Mackenzie
2 NTS♠ 4−22001.003.002-Kendall-Buttereck vs 9-Austin-Austin
2 NTS♠ 2−33000.004.004-Aiken-Willson vs 8-Ramadan-Sobenes

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
J 6
10 9 5 3 2
10 8 6
10 7 2
9 3
A 8 4
K J 9 3 2
K 9 3
N
WE
S
Q 10 8 5 2
J 7
A 7 5 4
5 4
1
11    7
21
A K 7 4
K Q 6
Q
A Q J 8 6

NS 3; EW 2♠; NS 3♣; EW 1N; EW 2; Par +140

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 ♣S♠ 931103.500.508-Ramadan-Sobenes vs 5-Jones-Field
3 ♣S A31103.500.5010-Burns-Burns vs 7-Smith-McCoy
2 ♠S K−21002.002.003-Hampton-Mackenzie vs 9-Austin-Austin
3 ♠S J−31500.503.501-Graves-Cherry vs 2-Kendall-Buttereck
3 ♠S 9−31500.503.506-Huebner-Miller vs 4-Aiken-Willson

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
Q 8 7 4
10 4 2
J 4 3
4 3 2
9 2
A Q J 7 5
Q 8 6 2
10 7
N
WE
S
A K J 10 3
8 6
A K 5
Q 8 6
3
9    17
11
6 5
K 9 3
10 9 7
A K J 9 5

E 5N; EW 5♠; EW 5; EW 5; W 2N; E 3♣; W 2♣; Par −660

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTE♣ A−22004.000.0010-Burns-Burns vs 7-Smith-McCoy
3 E♣ 861703.001.008-Ramadan-Sobenes vs 5-Jones-Field
2 ♠E♣ A52002.002.006-Huebner-Miller vs 4-Aiken-Willson
2 NTE♣ A52100.503.501-Graves-Cherry vs 2-Kendall-Buttereck
2 NTE 1052100.503.503-Hampton-Mackenzie vs 9-Austin-Austin

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
K 9 3
A K J 9 8 5
8 7
8 2
A Q 2
10 7 6 2
A K 10 4 3
Q
N
WE
S
10 8 7 6 5
Q
J 9 5
J 10 5 3
11
15    4
10
J 4
4 3
Q 6 2
A K 9 7 6 4

S 3N; EW 3♠; NS 3; N 1N; EW 2; NS 1♣; Par +100: EW 4♠×−1

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N 531403.500.503-Hampton-Mackenzie vs 9-Austin-Austin
2 N 531403.500.5010-Burns-Burns vs 7-Smith-McCoy
3 W A−1502.002.001-Graves-Cherry vs 2-Kendall-Buttereck
3 N J−22001.003.006-Huebner-Miller vs 4-Aiken-Willson
4 ×N 5−25000.004.008-Ramadan-Sobenes vs 5-Jones-Field