750 Thursday Aft Session April 2, 2015
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  B  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  6   68.33  114.80  A   1                0.88(A)  John Oakshott - Peggy Oakshott
 10   57.40   96.44  C   2     1     1    0.72(B)  Ann Sadler - Jane Willey
  1   52.88   88.83  C   3     2     2    0.50(B)  Carol Willoughby - Judy Geary
  3   51.16   85.95  A   4                0.31(A)  Martha Waller - Virginia Johnson
  2   48.49   81.46  C         3          0.36(B)  Jeremy Newel - Michael Newel
  5   46.32   77.81  C         4          0.25(B)  Patricia Creede - Nancy Schubert
  7   45.96   77.21  C                             Bill Burns - Andrew Graves
  8   45.32   76.13  C                             Barbara Kelley - Carol Levy
 11   44.95   75.52  B                             Angelina Heisdorf - Marge Field
  9   44.93   75.49  B                             Joan James - Elaine Smith
  4   44.61   74.95  B                             Mary Ann Clark - Gay Berry
750 Thursday Aft Session April 2, 2015
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  B  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  1   63.01  105.86  C   1     1     1    0.88(A)  Jerry F. Noga - John Hempel
  8   57.48   96.57  C   2     2     2    0.62(A)  Deb Petersen - Kathryn Miller
 10   56.67   95.21  C   3     3     3    0.44(A)  Cathleen Burden - Denny Tweed
  5   53.86   90.49  B   4     4          0.31(A)  Judy Nibler - Renee Laquerriere
  4   51.83   87.07  B                             Linda Town - Barbara Wiedel
  6   50.42   84.71  B                             Pat Huston - Nancy Holley
  7   49.11   82.50  C                             Don Myers - Doris Myers
  2   48.73   81.86  C                             Lois High - Sydney Bluestone
  9   35.92   60.34  C                             Karin Blanchard - Yvonne Jeffrey
  3   32.95   55.36  C                             Jonel Mueller - Linda Ginise

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
9
J 9 5 3 2
A J 7 6 3
K J
A J 2
K 6 4
K 10 8 4 2
10 8
N
WE
S
K Q 8 7 6 5
7
9
A Q 6 5 4
10 4 3
A Q 10 8
Q 5
9 7 3 2

EW 5; EW 3N; NS 3; EW 3; EW 1; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−1506.360.648-Kelley-Levy vs 4-Town-Wiedel
4 W−1506.360.6410-Sadler-Willey vs 8-Petersen-Miller
4 E44202.934.071-Willoughby-Geary vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 E44202.934.075-Creede-Schubert vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
4 E44202.934.077-Burns-Graves vs 2-High-Bluestone
4 E44202.934.0711-Heisdorf-Field vs 10-Burden-Tweed
4 E64800.076.939-James-Smith vs 6-Huston-Holley

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
A 9 3 2
K 8 5 3
10 4
10 8 7
Q J 10 7
Q
A J 5 2
J 4 3 2
N
WE
S
6 4
A 9 7 6 4
9 8 3
A 9 5
K 8 5
J 10 2
K Q 7 6
K Q 6

NS 2; NS 1N; NS 1; EW 1; EW 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N21106.930.079-James-Smith vs 6-Huston-Holley
1 NTW1905.791.2110-Sadler-Willey vs 8-Petersen-Miller
2 N−11004.642.365-Creede-Schubert vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
1 NTS−22002.934.071-Willoughby-Geary vs 1-Noga-Hempel
1 NTS−22002.934.077-Burns-Graves vs 2-High-Bluestone
2 NTS−33001.215.7911-Heisdorf-Field vs 10-Burden-Tweed
3 N−44000.076.938-Kelley-Levy vs 4-Town-Wiedel

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
3
Q 7
K Q 6 5
A J 10 9 5 4
J 10 7 4
10 4
A 3
K Q 8 7 6
N
WE
S
A 8 5
A K 5 2
J 10 9 8 2
3
K Q 9 6 2
J 9 8 6 3
7 4
2

W 1N; W 2; W 2; EW 1; NS 1; E 1; E 1; Par −90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−22006.930.075-Creede-Schubert vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
2 W−11005.791.211-Willoughby-Geary vs 1-Noga-Hempel
2 N−1504.642.367-Burns-Graves vs 2-High-Bluestone
2 N−21002.934.0710-Sadler-Willey vs 8-Petersen-Miller
2 NTN−21002.934.0711-Heisdorf-Field vs 10-Burden-Tweed
3 N−31501.215.799-James-Smith vs 6-Huston-Holley
3 N−42000.076.938-Kelley-Levy vs 4-Town-Wiedel

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
A K 7 5
9 6 4
K 7 5 2
A 7
10
K 3
Q J 10 9 3
Q J 8 5 4
N
WE
S
Q 9 6 3 2
A 8 5 2
8
10 9 6
J 8 4
Q J 10 7
A 6 4
K 3 2

NS 3; NS 2N; NS 2; EW 2; NS 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN36006.360.6410-Sadler-Willey vs 7-Myers-Myers
3 NTS36006.360.6411-Heisdorf-Field vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
2 NTN31504.642.362-Newel-Newel vs 2-High-Bluestone
2 N21103.503.508-Kelley-Levy vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
1 NTS1902.364.646-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 10-Burden-Tweed
3 NTS−11000.646.367-Burns-Graves vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 NTS−11000.646.369-James-Smith vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
J 8 6 4
Q 7 4 2
Q 7 3
K 3
10 3 2
A 10 5 3
2
Q 10 9 8 4
N
WE
S
A 9 7
K 6
A J 9 4
A 7 6 2
K Q 5
J 9 8
K 10 8 6 5
J 5

EW 4; EW 2N; EW 2; EW 1; NS 1; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTE31504.642.362-Newel-Newel vs 2-High-Bluestone
1 NTE31504.642.366-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 10-Burden-Tweed
2 NTE31504.642.368-Kelley-Levy vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
1 NTE31504.642.369-James-Smith vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
2 NTE31504.642.3611-Heisdorf-Field vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
1 NTE41801.215.7910-Sadler-Willey vs 7-Myers-Myers
3 NTE34000.076.937-Burns-Graves vs 1-Noga-Hempel

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
5
J 8 4 2
J 10 8 6
J 6 5 4
K J 7 4 2
K 6
7 5 3
8 3 2
N
WE
S
A 10 9
Q 10 9 3
A Q 4 2
K 7
Q 8 6 3
A 7 5
K 9
A Q 10 9

EW 3; E 2N; W 1N; NS 2; EW 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS−1506.930.072-Newel-Newel vs 2-High-Bluestone
2 E21105.791.2111-Heisdorf-Field vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
2 NTE21204.642.368-Kelley-Levy vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
2 E31402.364.646-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 10-Burden-Tweed
2 W31402.364.647-Burns-Graves vs 1-Noga-Hempel
2 E31402.364.649-James-Smith vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
1 N−42000.076.9310-Sadler-Willey vs 7-Myers-Myers

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
8 6 4 3
8
Q 10 9 6 5 4
K 7
A K 10 9 5
10 9 7
8
A Q 9 4
N
WE
S
Q 2
J 6 5 4 2
A K 2
8 5 3
J 7
A K Q 3
J 7 3
J 10 6 2

EW 3N; EW 3; EW 2; NS 2; EW 2; Par −500: NS 4×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−33006.930.073-Waller-Johnson vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
3 W−11005.791.2110-Sadler-Willey vs 6-Huston-Holley
3 W31404.642.369-James-Smith vs 4-Town-Wiedel
1 NTE31503.503.501-Willoughby-Geary vs 10-Burden-Tweed
2 E41702.364.6411-Heisdorf-Field vs 8-Petersen-Miller
3 NTE36001.215.798-Kelley-Levy vs 2-High-Bluestone
4 E46200.076.932-Newel-Newel vs 1-Noga-Hempel

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
J 7
A K 8 5 2
9 6 3
J 9 5
A 9 8 6
Q 6 4
A 7 5 4 2
10
N
WE
S
10 5 4 3
J 10 9
K J
7 4 3 2
K Q 2
7 3
Q 10 8
A K Q 8 6

NS 2N; NS 2; NS 3; EW 1; NS 1; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS34006.930.071-Willoughby-Geary vs 10-Burden-Tweed
2 NTS31505.211.793-Waller-Johnson vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
1 NTS31505.211.7910-Sadler-Willey vs 6-Huston-Holley
3 S31103.503.508-Kelley-Levy vs 2-High-Bluestone
2 S2902.364.649-James-Smith vs 4-Town-Wiedel
4 S−42000.646.362-Newel-Newel vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 S−42000.646.3611-Heisdorf-Field vs 8-Petersen-Miller

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
K
J 5
J 6 5 2
9 7 6 5 4 2
Q 9 7
K 10 9 7 6
K 10 8
K Q
N
WE
S
J 10 6 2
8 2
A 9 4 3
A 10 8
A 8 5 4 3
A Q 4 3
Q 7
J 3

EW 2N; EW 2; EW 2; EW 2; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 W−22006.930.0710-Sadler-Willey vs 6-Huston-Holley
2 W−11005.791.213-Waller-Johnson vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
2 W21102.934.072-Newel-Newel vs 1-Noga-Hempel
2 W21102.934.078-Kelley-Levy vs 2-High-Bluestone
2 W21102.934.079-James-Smith vs 4-Town-Wiedel
2 W21102.934.0711-Heisdorf-Field vs 8-Petersen-Miller
2 NTE31500.076.931-Willoughby-Geary vs 10-Burden-Tweed

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
A K Q
5 2
A Q 7 4 3
Q 4 2
J 7 6
6 4 3
5
K J 10 9 6 3
N
WE
S
10 9 5 3 2
10 7
K 8 6 2
8 7
8 4
A K Q J 9 8
J 10 9
A 5

NS 6N; NS 6; S 6; N 5; NS 3; NS 3; Par +1440

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 N714606.360.641-Willoughby-Geary vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
6 N714606.360.6411-Heisdorf-Field vs 7-Myers-Myers
4 N66804.072.938-Kelley-Levy vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 N66804.072.939-James-Smith vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
3 NTN46302.364.6410-Sadler-Willey vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
4 E66801.215.793-Waller-Johnson vs 2-High-Bluestone
6 NTW614400.076.934-Clark-Berry vs 4-Town-Wiedel

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
J 3
Q J 10 7 5 4
A 10
A Q J
A 9 8 7
3
K Q J 8 7 4 3
4
N
WE
S
K 10 6 5 2
A 9 8 6
9 5
10 5
Q 4
K 2
6 2
K 9 8 7 6 3 2

EW 5; EW 5; NS 2; NS 3; NS 1N; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N64806.930.079-James-Smith vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
5 S−21005.791.211-Willoughby-Geary vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
4 N−31504.642.363-Waller-Johnson vs 2-High-Bluestone
4 E44203.503.5010-Sadler-Willey vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
5 E54502.364.644-Clark-Berry vs 4-Town-Wiedel
5 ×W55501.215.798-Kelley-Levy vs 1-Noga-Hempel
5 ×W66500.076.9311-Heisdorf-Field vs 7-Myers-Myers

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
A K J 8 3
K 10 8 3
K J
10 3
7 6 2
Q 9 6 5
Q 7 2
A 9 7
N
WE
S
10 4
J 2
10 9 8 6 4
J 8 4 2
Q 9 5
A 7 4
A 5 3
K Q 6 5

NS 5N; NS 5; NS 5; NS 4; NS 3; Par +660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N56504.072.931-Willoughby-Geary vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
5 N56504.072.933-Waller-Johnson vs 2-High-Bluestone
4 N56504.072.934-Clark-Berry vs 4-Town-Wiedel
4 N56504.072.938-Kelley-Levy vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 N56504.072.939-James-Smith vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
4 N56504.072.9311-Heisdorf-Field vs 7-Myers-Myers
3 NTS46300.076.9310-Sadler-Willey vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
K 6 5 2
A 9 7 3
9 7
A 8 6
10 7 4
8 6
J 10 8
K 10 7 4 2
N
WE
S
Q J 9
Q J 5 4
Q 5 3 2
Q 3
A 8 3
K 10 2
A K 6 4
J 9 5

NS 4; NS 3N; NS 3; N 3; NS 2; S 2; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS36007.000.003-Waller-Johnson vs 1-Noga-Hempel
1 NTN31506.001.0010-Sadler-Willey vs 4-Town-Wiedel
1 NTS21205.002.001-Willoughby-Geary vs 8-Petersen-Miller
3 NTS−11004.003.002-Newel-Newel vs 10-Burden-Tweed
3 NTS−22002.005.004-Clark-Berry vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
3 NTS−22002.005.009-James-Smith vs 2-High-Bluestone
3 NTN−22002.005.0011-Heisdorf-Field vs 6-Huston-Holley
3 NTS−44000.007.005-Creede-Schubert vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
9 5
A K 7 6
A Q 3
A 10 8 6
Q J 8 7 3
8 2
10 7 4
K 3 2
N
WE
S
A K 6 4
J 9 5 4 3
K 8
Q 5
10 2
Q 10
J 9 6 5 2
J 9 7 4

EW 3; NS 3; N 3; S 2; Par −100: N 4×−1; NS 4×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS1907.000.001-Willoughby-Geary vs 8-Petersen-Miller
1 NTW−1505.002.004-Clark-Berry vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
3 W−1505.002.005-Creede-Schubert vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
4 W−1505.002.009-James-Smith vs 2-High-Bluestone
2 W31401.505.502-Newel-Newel vs 10-Burden-Tweed
2 W31401.505.503-Waller-Johnson vs 1-Noga-Hempel
2 W31401.505.5010-Sadler-Willey vs 4-Town-Wiedel
2 W31401.505.5011-Heisdorf-Field vs 6-Huston-Holley

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
A K Q 6
K 10
9 8 5 2
J 8 7
J 9 5
A 9 7 5
K 10
10 9 6 2
N
WE
S
10 8 7 3
Q J 4
A Q 3
A 5 4
4 2
8 6 3 2
J 7 6 4
K Q 3

EW 1N; NS 2; EW 1; EW 1; Par +90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS1906.001.001-Willoughby-Geary vs 8-Petersen-Miller
2 N2906.001.002-Newel-Newel vs 10-Burden-Tweed
2 N2906.001.004-Clark-Berry vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
2 W−1504.003.0010-Sadler-Willey vs 4-Town-Wiedel
3 N−11002.504.505-Creede-Schubert vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
1 NTS−11002.504.5011-Heisdorf-Field vs 6-Huston-Holley
1 NTW21200.506.503-Waller-Johnson vs 1-Noga-Hempel
1 NTE21200.506.509-James-Smith vs 2-High-Bluestone

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
7 3
8 7 3 2
K 7 4 2
Q J 2
K 10 4
A J 10 5 4
9 8 3
A 9
N
WE
S
Q J 8 5
K 9
J 6
K 10 8 4 3
A 9 6 2
Q 6
A Q 10 5
7 6 5

EW 3; EW 3; EW 2N; EW 3; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−11006.930.0710-Sadler-Willey vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
2 N−1505.791.214-Clark-Berry vs 2-High-Bluestone
2 E2904.642.362-Newel-Newel vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
2 W21103.503.5011-Heisdorf-Field vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
2 W31402.364.646-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 6-Huston-Holley
2 W41701.215.791-Willoughby-Geary vs 7-Myers-Myers
3 E52000.076.935-Creede-Schubert vs 4-Town-Wiedel

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
Q 10 3
J 9
9 8 3
A Q 7 5 4
8 6 4
A K 10 5 2
K J 5 2
10
N
WE
S
9 7
Q 7 6 4 3
A Q
J 8 6 2
A K J 5 2
8
10 7 6 4
K 9 3

EW 4; NS 2; NS 2; Par −300: NS 4×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 W−1506.930.076-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 6-Huston-Holley
4 S−21005.791.215-Creede-Schubert vs 4-Town-Wiedel
3 W52004.642.364-Clark-Berry vs 2-High-Bluestone
4 W44202.364.641-Willoughby-Geary vs 7-Myers-Myers
4 W44202.364.642-Newel-Newel vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
4 W44202.364.6411-Heisdorf-Field vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
4 W64800.076.9310-Sadler-Willey vs 3-Mueller-Ginise

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
A 6
4 2
A K 10 5 4 2
K Q 5
9
K 10 8 7 5 3
Q 9
10 8 6 4
N
WE
S
K Q 8 7 5
A Q 9 6
6
A J 7
J 10 4 3 2
J
J 8 7 3
9 3 2

EW 4; NS 3; EW 3; EW 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 E−1506.930.076-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 6-Huston-Holley
4 E44202.934.071-Willoughby-Geary vs 7-Myers-Myers
4 W44202.934.072-Newel-Newel vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
4 W44202.934.074-Clark-Berry vs 2-High-Bluestone
4 W44202.934.075-Creede-Schubert vs 4-Town-Wiedel
4 W44202.934.0710-Sadler-Willey vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
4 E44202.934.0711-Heisdorf-Field vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
Q 9 7 6 5 4
4
A K 10 4 3 2
A J 10 2
K Q
9 8 7
8 6 5 2
N
WE
S
K
J 5 3 2
Q 6 5
A K 10 9 7
8 3
A 10 9 8 7 6
J
Q J 4 3

NS 3; EW 1N; NS 2; EW 2; NS 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−22007.000.007-Burns-Graves vs 7-Myers-Myers
3 N31405.501.505-Creede-Schubert vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
3 N31405.501.506-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
3 W−11004.003.0011-Heisdorf-Field vs 4-Town-Wiedel
3 S−21002.005.001-Willoughby-Geary vs 6-Huston-Holley
3 N−21002.005.002-Newel-Newel vs 8-Petersen-Miller
3 N−21002.005.003-Waller-Johnson vs 10-Burden-Tweed
2 S−31500.007.004-Clark-Berry vs 1-Noga-Hempel

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
K Q J 9 7 4 2
K Q 9
10 9 2
5 3
8 5 4 2
K J 9 4
K Q J
N
WE
S
A 6
A 7
A Q 8 5 2
A 6 5 3
10 8
J 10 6 3
10 7 6 3
8 7 4

EW 5N; EW 5; W 5; E 4; EW 2; NS 1; Par −660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N31407.000.005-Creede-Schubert vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
3 N−11006.001.0011-Heisdorf-Field vs 4-Town-Wiedel
4 E51503.503.501-Willoughby-Geary vs 6-Huston-Holley
4 E51503.503.503-Waller-Johnson vs 10-Burden-Tweed
4 E51503.503.504-Clark-Berry vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 E51503.503.506-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
3 ×N−12001.006.002-Newel-Newel vs 8-Petersen-Miller
5 E56000.007.007-Burns-Graves vs 7-Myers-Myers

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
A 6 5
J 10 3
K Q 10 9 6 5
5
K Q J 7
7 5 2
J 3 2
K 6 2
N
WE
S
10 9 2
A K 8 6
A 8
A J 8 3
8 4 3
Q 9 4
7 4
Q 10 9 7 4

EW 3; W 3; W 2N; E 2; E 1N; EW 2; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−21007.000.006-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
2 E−1506.001.007-Burns-Graves vs 7-Myers-Myers
2 W21105.002.005-Creede-Schubert vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
2 E31403.503.502-Newel-Newel vs 8-Petersen-Miller
3 W31403.503.504-Clark-Berry vs 1-Noga-Hempel
2 N−22002.005.003-Waller-Johnson vs 10-Burden-Tweed
3 NTE34001.006.0011-Heisdorf-Field vs 4-Town-Wiedel
3 NTE44300.007.001-Willoughby-Geary vs 6-Huston-Holley

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
J 7 6 5 4 3
8 6
A Q 4
A 9
A K
Q 10 9 4 3
J 9 2
Q J 3
N
WE
S
2
A K 2
K 10 8 7 6
K 7 5 2
Q 10 9 8
J 7 5
5 3
10 8 6 4

EW 5N; EW 5; EW 5; EW 4; NS 1; Par −660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW36006.360.645-Creede-Schubert vs 2-High-Bluestone
3 NTW36006.360.646-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 4-Town-Wiedel
4 W46204.642.362-Newel-Newel vs 7-Myers-Myers
3 NTW46303.503.507-Burns-Graves vs 6-Huston-Holley
4 W56501.215.791-Willoughby-Geary vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
4 W56501.215.793-Waller-Johnson vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
4 W56501.215.798-Kelley-Levy vs 8-Petersen-Miller

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
10 8 7
9
10 9 8 6 5 2
6 4 3
A Q 6 5 3 2
A 8 7 5 3
K 2
N
WE
S
9 4
K Q J 4
A K
A Q 10 9 5
K J
10 6 2
Q J 7 4 3
J 8 7

EW 7N; EW 7; EW 7; EW 6; EW 2; Par −2220

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 W614306.930.076-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 4-Town-Wiedel
6 W714605.791.211-Willoughby-Geary vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
6 NTE714702.364.642-Newel-Newel vs 7-Myers-Myers
6 NTE714702.364.643-Waller-Johnson vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
6 NTE714702.364.645-Creede-Schubert vs 2-High-Bluestone
6 NTE714702.364.647-Burns-Graves vs 6-Huston-Holley
6 NTE714702.364.648-Kelley-Levy vs 8-Petersen-Miller

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
K Q 5 4
J 7
A K
A 10 9 6 5
8 7
A Q 10 9 4 3 2
9 7 4
J
N
WE
S
A J 6 3 2
J 10 6 3
Q 7 3 2
10 9
K 8 6 5
Q 8 5 2
K 8 4

NS 3N; NS 4; NS 1; EW 1; NS 1; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ×W−35006.930.076-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 4-Town-Wiedel
3 N41305.791.213-Waller-Johnson vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
3 W−21004.642.368-Kelley-Levy vs 8-Petersen-Miller
3 W−1503.503.502-Newel-Newel vs 7-Myers-Myers
4 N−1502.364.641-Willoughby-Geary vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
3 S−31501.215.797-Burns-Graves vs 6-Huston-Holley
3 S−42000.076.935-Creede-Schubert vs 2-High-Bluestone

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
K 6 2
A 9 5 4 2
9 5
Q 6 4
Q J 10 9 7 4 3
7 6 3
A K 3
N
WE
S
A 8
K J 10
J 6 4
A K 10 5 2
5
Q 8
Q 10 8 7 2
J 9 8 7 3

EW 5; EW 4N; EW 2; EW 2; EW 2; Par −650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 E−22006.500.507-Burns-Graves vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
6 ×W−12006.500.509-James-Smith vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
4 W46204.502.506-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
4 E46204.502.508-Kelley-Levy vs 7-Myers-Myers
4 E56503.004.002-Newel-Newel vs 6-Huston-Holley
3 NTE56602.005.003-Waller-Johnson vs 8-Petersen-Miller
4 E66800.506.504-Clark-Berry vs 10-Burden-Tweed
4 E66800.506.505-Creede-Schubert vs 1-Noga-Hempel

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
9 3
K J 6
A J 6
A K 9 8 2
A K J 6 5
Q 10 5
K 10
7 6 5
N
WE
S
Q 8
A 9
Q 9 7 5 4 3 2
J 3
10 7 4 2
8 7 4 3 2
8
Q 10 4

EW 2; NS 2; EW 3; NS 2; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−33007.000.002-Newel-Newel vs 6-Huston-Holley
3 ×W−12006.001.008-Kelley-Levy vs 7-Myers-Myers
3 N31105.002.006-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
2 W−11003.503.504-Clark-Berry vs 10-Burden-Tweed
4 E−11003.503.509-James-Smith vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
3 E31102.005.003-Waller-Johnson vs 8-Petersen-Miller
2 W41701.006.005-Creede-Schubert vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 S−33000.007.007-Burns-Graves vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
A 8
K J 8 5 3
A 6 3
K J 3
9 3
10 7
10 9 5 4
Q 10 7 4 2
N
WE
S
K 10 6 4
6 4
K Q J 2
A 9 8
Q J 7 5 2
A Q 9 2
8 7
6 5

NS 4; NS 3; NS 2N; EW 1; EW 1; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N54507.000.007-Burns-Graves vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
4 N44203.004.002-Newel-Newel vs 6-Huston-Holley
4 N44203.004.003-Waller-Johnson vs 8-Petersen-Miller
4 N44203.004.004-Clark-Berry vs 10-Burden-Tweed
4 N44203.004.005-Creede-Schubert vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 N44203.004.006-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
4 S44203.004.008-Kelley-Levy vs 7-Myers-Myers
4 N44203.004.009-James-Smith vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey

Board 28
West Deals
N-S Vul
8 4 2
5
10 6 3
K Q 7 4 3 2
K 5
A K J 6
9 8 5 4 2
8 5
N
WE
S
A J 3
9 4 3 2
A K Q
J 9 6
Q 10 9 7 6
Q 10 8 7
J 7
A 10

EW 4; EW 4; EW 1N; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−1505.791.214-Clark-Berry vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
4 E−1505.791.216-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 2-High-Bluestone
5 W−1505.791.218-Kelley-Levy vs 6-Huston-Holley
3 W31403.503.503-Waller-Johnson vs 7-Myers-Myers
3 NTE44302.364.6410-Sadler-Willey vs 10-Burden-Tweed
3 NTE54601.215.797-Burns-Graves vs 4-Town-Wiedel
3 S−66000.076.939-James-Smith vs 8-Petersen-Miller

Board 29
North Deals
Both Vul
K J
K 10 6 5
K J 6 5 4
K 9
Q 7 5 4
7 3 2
A Q 10
10 8 3
N
WE
S
10 9 3
A Q J 8
9 3
A 7 6 2
A 8 6 2
9 4
8 7 2
Q J 5 4

NS 1N; NS 2; NS 1; NS 1; Par +90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTN31506.360.643-Waller-Johnson vs 7-Myers-Myers
2 NTN31506.360.646-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 2-High-Bluestone
1 NTN21204.072.937-Burns-Graves vs 4-Town-Wiedel
1 NTN21204.072.9310-Sadler-Willey vs 10-Burden-Tweed
2 N31102.364.644-Clark-Berry vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
1 NTS−11001.215.798-Kelley-Levy vs 6-Huston-Holley
2 N−33000.076.939-James-Smith vs 8-Petersen-Miller

Board 30
East Deals
None Vul
A Q 10 4
J 10 7
10 9
Q 8 6 2
K 7 5
A K Q 5 4
5
A K 5 3
N
WE
S
9 8
9 8 6
A J 7 6 4 3
10 9
J 6 3 2
3 2
K Q 8 2
J 7 4

EW 4; EW 2N; EW 2; EW 2; W 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−1506.930.0710-Sadler-Willey vs 10-Burden-Tweed
3 W31404.642.363-Waller-Johnson vs 7-Myers-Myers
2 W31404.642.364-Clark-Berry vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
1 W31404.642.369-James-Smith vs 8-Petersen-Miller
3 NTW34002.364.648-Kelley-Levy vs 6-Huston-Holley
4 W44201.215.797-Burns-Graves vs 4-Town-Wiedel
4 W54500.076.936-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 2-High-Bluestone

Board 31
South Deals
N-S Vul
A Q 9 7 5
6 4 3
10
K 6 4 3
10 4 3 2
J 10 8
8 7 4 3
9 7
N
WE
S
8 6
K Q 7 2
A K 9 2
J 10 2
K J
A 9 5
Q J 6 5
A Q 8 5

NS 4N; NS 4; NS 5; NS 2; NS 1; Par +630

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS56606.930.076-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 NTS46305.791.219-James-Smith vs 7-Myers-Myers
3 NTS36003.503.507-Burns-Graves vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
3 NTS36003.503.508-Kelley-Levy vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
3 NTS36003.503.5010-Sadler-Willey vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
4 S−11000.646.364-Clark-Berry vs 8-Petersen-Miller
4 S−11000.646.365-Creede-Schubert vs 10-Burden-Tweed

Board 32
West Deals
E-W Vul
K 4
K 2
K J 5 3
A J 10 5 4
5 2
A 10 7 3
A 10 7 6 4
8 7
N
WE
S
A Q J 8
Q 5
9 2
K Q 9 6 3
10 9 7 6 3
J 9 8 6 4
Q 8
2

EW 2N; EW 2; EW 2; EW 1; EW 1; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 E−11006.930.0710-Sadler-Willey vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
2 W2905.791.215-Creede-Schubert vs 10-Burden-Tweed
3 NTN−21004.642.367-Burns-Graves vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
2 NTN−31502.364.644-Clark-Berry vs 8-Petersen-Miller
2 N−31502.364.648-Kelley-Levy vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
2 NTN−31502.364.649-James-Smith vs 7-Myers-Myers
3 NTW36000.076.936-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 1-Noga-Hempel

Board 33
North Deals
None Vul
A 9 7 6 2
7 4
10 8 7
6 4 2
K J 10 8 3
5
K J 2
K J 7 5
N
WE
S
Q 4
A K Q J 6
9 3
A Q 9 3
5
10 9 8 3 2
A Q 6 5 4
10 8

EW 5N; EW 4; EW 4; EW 4; EW 3; Par −460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 E−1506.930.076-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 W31405.791.217-Burns-Graves vs 3-Mueller-Ginise
3 NTW34004.642.3610-Sadler-Willey vs 9-Blanchard-Jeffrey
4 E44202.934.074-Clark-Berry vs 8-Petersen-Miller
5 E64202.934.078-Kelley-Levy vs 5-Nibler-Laquerriere
3 NTW44301.215.799-James-Smith vs 7-Myers-Myers
6 W69200.076.935-Creede-Schubert vs 10-Burden-Tweed