Wednesday Evening Pairs Wednesday Eve Session April 8, 2015
Scores after  7 rounds  Average:   31.5      Section  C
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  1   59.52   37.50  B   1     1          0.64(A)  Nancy Jones - Marge Field
  6   54.76   34.50  B   2     2          0.45(A)  JoAnn Huebner - M. Steve Johnson
  3   53.97   34.00  C   3     3     1    0.32(A)  Pamela Pigg - Sue Comporato
  4   50.79   32.00  C               2    0.21(C)  Ellen Stoneburg - Madeline Lynes
  5   48.41   30.50  C                             Linda Pickett - Jane Willson
  7   47.62   30.00  B                             Don Austin - Marion Austin
  2   42.86   27.00  C                             James Bushman - Debbie Kemp
  8   42.06   26.50  C                             Erin Austin - Susan Shaver

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
10 9 8 3
A 10 9 5
A 6
A 9 7
Q 4 2
J 3 2
Q 10 8
K Q 8 3
N
WE
S
K J 7
8 7 4
J 3 2
J 5 4 2
A 6 5
K Q 6
K 9 7 5 4
10 6

NS 4; NS 4; NS 3N; NS 4; NS 2; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N41703.000.003-Pigg-Comporato vs 7-Austin-Austin
2 NTS21201.002.002-Bushman-Kemp vs 4-Stoneburg-Lynes
2 NTS21201.002.005-Pickett-Willson vs 6-Huebner-Johnson
1 NTN21201.002.008-Austin-Shaver vs 1-Jones-Field

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
K 10 3
K Q 10 9 7
2
10 8 7 3
A 9 6 4
6
A J 7 4
Q J 9 5
N
WE
S
J 8 5
A 5 4 3
Q 9 3
A 6 2
Q 7 2
J 8 2
K 10 8 6 5
K 4

EW 2; EW 1N; S 1; EW 1; EW 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−21003.000.008-Austin-Shaver vs 1-Jones-Field
2 NTE21201.501.503-Pigg-Comporato vs 7-Austin-Austin
1 NTE21201.501.505-Pickett-Willson vs 6-Huebner-Johnson
3 NTE34000.003.002-Bushman-Kemp vs 4-Stoneburg-Lynes

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
K Q 7 6 5
10 8
J 5
A 9 8 3
J
K J 7 5
A 9 7 6
K Q 4 2
N
WE
S
A 9
A Q 9 6 3
K 8
J 10 7 5
10 8 4 3 2
4 2
Q 10 4 3 2
6

EW 5; EW 5; EW 2N; NS 2; EW 2; Par −500: NS 5×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E56503.000.003-Pigg-Comporato vs 7-Austin-Austin
4 E66801.002.002-Bushman-Kemp vs 4-Stoneburg-Lynes
4 E66801.002.005-Pickett-Willson vs 6-Huebner-Johnson
4 E66801.002.008-Austin-Shaver vs 1-Jones-Field

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
A 4 2
A 3
10 9 7 4 2
J 10 9
3
Q 9 8 5
Q 6
A 7 6 5 4 2
N
WE
S
K Q 10 5
10 7 6 2
5 3
K Q 8
J 9 8 7 6
K J 4
A K J 8
3

NS 3; NS 4; NS 1N; EW 1; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S31402.500.503-Pigg-Comporato vs 5-Pickett-Willson
2 S31402.500.508-Austin-Shaver vs 2-Bushman-Kemp
3 S41301.002.006-Huebner-Johnson vs 7-Austin-Austin
2 S21100.003.004-Stoneburg-Lynes vs 1-Jones-Field

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
A 4 3
Q 9 6
J 9 7 5
8 7 2
K J 9 2
K J 7
Q 3
A 10 9 5
N
WE
S
10 6 5
A 10 4 2
10 6 4 2
4 3
Q 8 7
8 5 3
A K 8
K Q J 6

EW 2; EW 2; EW 1N; EW 1; S 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N−11002.001.003-Pigg-Comporato vs 5-Pickett-Willson
1 NTS−11002.001.004-Stoneburg-Lynes vs 1-Jones-Field
1 NTS−11002.001.006-Huebner-Johnson vs 7-Austin-Austin
2 S−22000.003.008-Austin-Shaver vs 2-Bushman-Kemp

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
J 10 8
9 6 5 3
10
J 9 7 4 2
K 9 7 5 4
A Q
A 9 7 3 2
3
N
WE
S
Q 6 2
K J 10 7
J 4
K 10 6 5
A 3
8 4 2
K Q 8 6 5
A Q 8

E 4; E 3N; W 3; E 3; W 2N; W 2; EW 3; EW 1; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 W21103.000.008-Austin-Shaver vs 2-Bushman-Kemp
1 NTS−31502.001.006-Huebner-Johnson vs 7-Austin-Austin
3 W41701.002.003-Pigg-Comporato vs 5-Pickett-Willson
1 W52000.003.004-Stoneburg-Lynes vs 1-Jones-Field

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
J 9 7
7 3 2
A J 10 8 2
A Q
A K 10 4 2
A Q 9 8 6
7
K 5
N
WE
S
8 5
K J 10 5
6 5 4 3
10 8 7
Q 6 3
4
K Q 9
J 9 6 4 3 2

EW 4; W 3; E 2; NS 3; NS 3; Par −500: NS 5×−2; NS 5×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 W1803.000.004-Stoneburg-Lynes vs 6-Huebner-Johnson
1 E31402.001.008-Austin-Shaver vs 3-Pigg-Comporato
2 W41701.002.005-Pickett-Willson vs 2-Bushman-Kemp
4 W46200.003.007-Austin-Austin vs 1-Jones-Field

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
A Q 3
6
A 9 8 7 6 3
K 9 4
9 7
10 8 5 4 3
Q J 5
8 7 2
N
WE
S
K J 6 5 2
A Q 2
2
Q J 10 6
10 8 4
K J 9 7
K 10 4
A 5 3

NS 3N; NS 4; N 2; N 2; S 1; NS 1; S 1; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N51503.000.005-Pickett-Willson vs 2-Bushman-Kemp
2 N41301.501.504-Stoneburg-Lynes vs 6-Huebner-Johnson
3 N41301.501.508-Austin-Shaver vs 3-Pigg-Comporato
3 N31100.003.007-Austin-Austin vs 1-Jones-Field

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
Q J 9 6 4
A Q J 10 9
7 6
A
5
K 8 2
9 5 3
Q J 9 8 4 2
N
WE
S
K 10 8
7 6 3
K 10 8 2
10 7 5
A 7 3 2
5 4
A Q J 4
K 6 3

NS 7N; NS 7; NS 6; NS 6; NS 3; Par +1520

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 N69803.000.005-Pickett-Willson vs 2-Bushman-Kemp
4 N64802.001.007-Austin-Austin vs 1-Jones-Field
4 N54500.502.504-Stoneburg-Lynes vs 6-Huebner-Johnson
4 N54500.502.508-Austin-Shaver vs 3-Pigg-Comporato

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
9
A 4 3
9 7 3 2
K Q J 10 9
7 4 3
K 9
10 6
A 8 7 6 3 2
N
WE
S
A Q 8 6 5
J 10 7 6
K 5
5 4
K J 10 2
Q 8 5 2
A Q J 8 4

NS 4N; S 5; NS 3; N 4; NS 3; NS 1; Par +630

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTN41803.000.005-Pickett-Willson vs 7-Austin-Austin
3 S31102.001.008-Austin-Shaver vs 4-Stoneburg-Lynes
5 S−11000.502.501-Jones-Field vs 2-Bushman-Kemp
5 S−11000.502.506-Huebner-Johnson vs 3-Pigg-Comporato

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
Q 9 6 3
J 8
K 7
A K Q 9 5
K 8
Q
A J 10 9 6 4 3
J 7 3
N
WE
S
J 5 4
10 7 5 4 3 2
5
10 4 2
A 10 7 2
A K 9 6
Q 8 2
8 6

NS 5N; NS 4; NS 3; NS 4; S 2; N 1; Par +460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN34003.000.008-Austin-Shaver vs 4-Stoneburg-Lynes
3 S−1501.501.501-Jones-Field vs 2-Bushman-Kemp
4 N−1501.501.506-Huebner-Johnson vs 3-Pigg-Comporato
4 N−21000.003.005-Pickett-Willson vs 7-Austin-Austin

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
K 7 4
9
K 10 9 8
K Q 9 5 4
J 5 2
Q J 7 5 4
7 4
A 8 6
N
WE
S
A K 3 2
Q J 6 5 3 2
J 7 3
A Q 10 9 8 6 3
10 8 6
A
10 2

NS 5; EW 2; W 3; N 3; NS 1N; E 2; S 2; Par +500: W 6×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S56503.000.006-Huebner-Johnson vs 3-Pigg-Comporato
4 S46202.001.001-Jones-Field vs 2-Bushman-Kemp
4 S−11001.002.005-Pickett-Willson vs 7-Austin-Austin
3 W31400.003.008-Austin-Shaver vs 4-Stoneburg-Lynes

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
Q J 7 4 2
A 6 5 3
9 7 6 4
A K 7 2
10 9 6 5 3
10 8 7
K
N
WE
S
J 10 8 5
A K
Q J
Q J 8 5 3
Q 9 6 4 3
8
K 9 4 2
A 10 2

EW 2N; EW 2; NS 3; EW 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−22002.001.006-Huebner-Johnson vs 1-Jones-Field
4 E−22002.001.007-Austin-Austin vs 4-Stoneburg-Lynes
4 E−22002.001.008-Austin-Shaver vs 5-Pickett-Willson
2 E−11000.003.002-Bushman-Kemp vs 3-Pigg-Comporato

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
A K J 9 8 7 3
4
5
A 10 5 2
Q 6
A 7 2
A J 8 7 3 2
4 3
N
WE
S
10 5
6 3
K Q 9 6
Q J 9 8 6
4 2
K Q J 10 9 8 5
10 4
K 7

NS 5; NS 4; EW 2; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N54503.000.002-Bushman-Kemp vs 3-Pigg-Comporato
2 N62302.001.007-Austin-Austin vs 4-Stoneburg-Lynes
3 N31401.002.008-Austin-Shaver vs 5-Pickett-Willson
5 ×S−11000.003.006-Huebner-Johnson vs 1-Jones-Field

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
Q J 9 6
K Q J 10 3
8 3
K 7
7 5 3 2
7 5
Q
Q 10 9 8 5 3
N
WE
S
A 9 8 2
K J 10 7 6 5 4 2
6
A K 10 8 4
6 4
A 9
A J 4 2

NS 5; N 4; S 3; NS 2N; EW 2; NS 2; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 ×E−48003.000.002-Bushman-Kemp vs 3-Pigg-Comporato
4 S66802.001.006-Huebner-Johnson vs 1-Jones-Field
4 S46201.002.008-Austin-Shaver vs 5-Pickett-Willson
4 S−11000.003.007-Austin-Austin vs 4-Stoneburg-Lynes

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
8 3
10 9 6
K 10 4 3
A K 3 2
J 5
A K Q J 5 4
J 5
Q 8 5
N
WE
S
A K Q 10 9 7 6
9 7 6 2
J 6
4 2
8 7 3 2
A Q 8
10 9 7 4

EW 3; EW 3; EW 1N; EW 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E21103.000.001-Jones-Field vs 5-Pickett-Willson
4 E56501.501.503-Pigg-Comporato vs 4-Stoneburg-Lynes
4 E56501.501.507-Austin-Austin vs 2-Bushman-Kemp
4 E66800.003.008-Austin-Shaver vs 6-Huebner-Johnson

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
6
A K Q J
A Q 4 2
K Q 8 6
5 2
6 5
K J 9 8 6
J 10 7 3
N
WE
S
Q 9
10 7 4 2
10 7 5
9 5 4 2
A K J 10 8 7 4 3
9 8 3
3
A

NS 7N; NS 7; NS 7; NS 5; NS 4; Par +1520

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 NTN710203.000.007-Austin-Austin vs 2-Bushman-Kemp
6 S710101.501.501-Jones-Field vs 5-Pickett-Willson
6 S710101.501.503-Pigg-Comporato vs 4-Stoneburg-Lynes
3 NTN75200.003.008-Austin-Shaver vs 6-Huebner-Johnson

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
A 10 7 5 2
K 9 6
A Q 8 5 2
Q 4
A J 10 5
J 10 7
J 10 9 7
N
WE
S
K 8 3
K 9 8 7 4
4 2
K 4 3
J 9 6
Q 6 3 2
A Q 8 5 3
6

NS 5; NS 4; NS 1N; EW 1; NS 1; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N56503.000.007-Austin-Austin vs 2-Bushman-Kemp
3 N62302.001.001-Jones-Field vs 5-Pickett-Willson
1 N41701.002.003-Pigg-Comporato vs 4-Stoneburg-Lynes
3 E31400.003.008-Austin-Shaver vs 6-Huebner-Johnson

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
K 5
7 5 2
J 10 9 6 4 3
9 4
10 9 6 4 2
K Q 8 6
5
K Q 7
N
WE
S
Q J 8 7 3
A
Q 8 2
10 6 5 3
A
J 10 9 4 3
A K 7
A J 8 2

EW 3; NS 1N; NS 2; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ×W−12003.000.001-Jones-Field vs 3-Pigg-Comporato
4 W−11002.001.002-Bushman-Kemp vs 6-Huebner-Johnson
1 NTS1901.002.008-Austin-Shaver vs 7-Austin-Austin
2 E31400.003.004-Stoneburg-Lynes vs 5-Pickett-Willson

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
K 7
2
A K J 10 9 8 7 4
J 10
5 2
10 8 7 5 4
5 3
9 8 7 4
N
WE
S
Q 3
A K J 9 3
6 2
K 6 5 2
A J 10 9 8 6 4
Q 6
Q
A Q 3

NS 6; NS 6; NS 2N; NS 1; NS 1; Par +1430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S77103.000.004-Stoneburg-Lynes vs 5-Pickett-Willson
4 S66802.001.002-Bushman-Kemp vs 6-Huebner-Johnson
5 N66201.002.001-Jones-Field vs 3-Pigg-Comporato
2 N61700.003.008-Austin-Shaver vs 7-Austin-Austin

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
9 5
K 10
K 8 6
A K 9 7 6 2
K J 10 7 2
J 4 2
A J 9
J 10
N
WE
S
8 3
A 9 8 7 3
Q 3
Q 8 5 4
A Q 6 4
Q 6 5
10 7 5 4 2
3

NS 2; W 1; EW 1; NS 1; Par +90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTN1903.000.002-Bushman-Kemp vs 6-Huebner-Johnson
2 E−1502.001.008-Austin-Shaver vs 7-Austin-Austin
2 N−22001.002.004-Stoneburg-Lynes vs 5-Pickett-Willson
2 NTN−33000.003.001-Jones-Field vs 3-Pigg-Comporato