750 Thursday Aft Session April 9, 2015
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  B  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  1   62.59  105.15  C   1     1     1    0.96(A)  Robert Cherry - Tay Cherry
  3   60.05  100.89  A   2                0.67(A)  Martha Waller - Virginia Johnson
  7   56.07   94.19  A   3                0.48(A)  John Oakshott - Peggy Oakshott
  9   55.49   93.22  A   4                0.34(A)  Sandy Richardson - Paul Boyd
  4   51.92   87.23  B   5     2          0.50(B)  Mary Ann Clark - Gay Berry
  8   48.85   82.07  C         3     2    0.36(B)  Carol Levy - Barbara Kelley
  5   48.39   81.30  B         4          0.25(B)  Patricia Creede - Angelina Heisdorf
 11   47.78   80.27  C                             Helen Smades - Mark Smith
  2   45.33   76.15  C                             Jeremy Newel - Michael Newel
  6   44.85   75.35  B                             Barbara Brock - Pearl McGinnis
 10   43.15   72.49  C                             Joan Deyager - Marsha Infausto
 12   33.76   56.71  C                             Sue Gearhart - Cheryl Hiney
750 Thursday Aft Session April 9, 2015
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  B  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  6   60.63  101.85  B   1     1          0.96(A)  Renee Laquerriere - Rhonda Hampton
 12   59.32   99.65  B   2     2          0.67(A)  Julie Wilson - Gerry Jones
 11   54.00   90.72  B   3     3          0.48(A)  Pat Huston - Nancy Holley
  8   52.60   88.36  B   4     4          0.34(A)  Lois High - Barry Druffel
  1   51.75   86.94  C   5           1    0.42(C)  John Hempel - Jerry F. Noga
  3   50.59   84.99  C               2    0.29(C)  Linda Town - Barbara Wiedel
  4   46.55   78.21  C                             Betty Pash - Joanne Cohen
  5   45.88   77.07  C                             Cathleen Burden - Denny Tweed
  9   43.27   72.70  A                             Karin Blanchard - Judy Zimmerer
  7   42.95   72.15  C                             Bill Rogers - Chris Rogers
  2   42.48   71.37  C                             Deb Petersen - Kathryn Miller

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
♠A
♥A 9 8
♦Q J 10 8 7 5
♣9 8 2
♠J 9 8 7 5 3
♥10 6
♦A
♣10 5 4 3
N
WE
S
♠Q 4
♥Q J 4 3 2
♦K 3
♣A K J 6
♠K 10 6 2
♥K 7 5
♦9 6 4 2
♣Q 7

EW 2♠; EW 2♥; NS 3♦; EW 3♣; Par +100: EW 3♥×−1; EW 3♠×−1; EW 4♣×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTE−31506.930.0710-Deyager-Infausto vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
3 ♦N41305.791.219-Richardson-Boyd vs 5-Burden-Tweed
3 ♦N31104.072.931-Cherry-Cherry vs 1-Hempel-Noga
3 ♦N31104.072.937-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 12-Wilson-Jones
4 ♥E−1502.364.6412-Gearhart-Hiney vs 11-Huston-Holley
3 ♠W31400.646.368-Levy-Kelley vs 3-Town-Wiedel
2 ♥E31400.646.3611-Smades-Smith vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠A K 9 6 5
♥J 6 5
♦10 8 6
♣8 2
♠J 8 2
♥K 9 7
♦Q 4 3
♣A 9 7 4
N
WE
S
♠Q
♥A Q 8 4 3
♦K 7 5 2
♣Q J 3
♠10 7 4 3
♥10 2
♦A J 9
♣K 10 6 5

EW 3♥; NS 2♠; EW 3♦; EW 1N; EW 2♣; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥E−21006.930.0711-Smades-Smith vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
4 ♥E−1505.211.799-Richardson-Boyd vs 5-Burden-Tweed
4 ♥E−1505.211.7912-Gearhart-Hiney vs 11-Huston-Holley
2 ♥E41702.934.078-Levy-Kelley vs 3-Town-Wiedel
2 ♥E41702.934.0710-Deyager-Infausto vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
3 ♥E52001.215.791-Cherry-Cherry vs 1-Hempel-Noga
4 ♥E44200.076.937-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 12-Wilson-Jones

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠10 9 2
♥8
♦A K Q 10 7 3
♣A 9 4
♠A Q 7 4
♥A K Q 10 5
♦5 4
♣5 2
N
WE
S
♠5
♥J 7 6 4 2
♦J 9 8 6
♣10 7 6
♠K J 8 6 3
♥9 3
♦2
♣K Q J 8 3

NS 3♠; EW 3♥; S 3♦; NS 3♣; N 2♦; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠S44206.360.647-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 12-Wilson-Jones
4 ♠S44206.360.649-Richardson-Boyd vs 5-Burden-Tweed
2 ♦N41304.642.3610-Deyager-Infausto vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
4 ♠S−1502.364.648-Levy-Kelley vs 3-Town-Wiedel
4 ♠S−1502.364.6411-Smades-Smith vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
4 ♦N−1502.364.6412-Gearhart-Hiney vs 11-Huston-Holley
4 ♠×S−11000.076.931-Cherry-Cherry vs 1-Hempel-Noga

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
♠7 4 3 2
♥A K J 10 3
♦J 10 3
♣J
♠K J 9
♥7 5 4
♦K Q 7 6
♣9 5 2
N
WE
S
♠Q
♥9 8 2
♦9 5
♣A K 8 7 6 4 3
♠A 10 8 6 5
♥Q 6
♦A 8 4 2
♣Q 10

NS 3♠; S 3♥; N 2♥; S 2♦; N 1♦; EW 1♣; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠S31406.930.079-Richardson-Boyd vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 ♣E−11005.791.2111-Smades-Smith vs 8-High-Druffel
3 ♥N−11004.072.931-Cherry-Cherry vs 12-Wilson-Jones
4 ♠S−11004.072.9310-Deyager-Infausto vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
3 ♠S−22001.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 2-Petersen-Miller
4 ♠S−22001.215.797-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 11-Huston-Holley
3 ♠S−22001.215.798-Levy-Kelley vs 1-Hempel-Noga

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠K Q 7 6 3
♥7 3 2
♦K Q 2
♣10 7
♠A 10 9 4
♥K J 10
♦8 5 4
♣8 6 3
N
WE
S
♠J 5
♥A Q 6 5
♦A 7 6
♣A K Q J
♠8 2
♥9 8 4
♦J 10 9 3
♣9 5 4 2

EW 4N; EW 4♥; W 3♠; EW 4♣; E 2♠; EW 3♦; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 NTE−21006.930.078-Levy-Kelley vs 1-Hempel-Noga
3 NTE34005.791.219-Richardson-Boyd vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 NTE44302.364.641-Cherry-Cherry vs 12-Wilson-Jones
3 NTE44302.364.642-Newel-Newel vs 2-Petersen-Miller
3 NTE44302.364.647-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 11-Huston-Holley
3 NTE44302.364.6410-Deyager-Infausto vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
3 NTE44302.364.6411-Smades-Smith vs 8-High-Druffel

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠8 7 6
♥A 6 2
♦8 7 6
♣K Q 10 8
♠J 9 2
♥5 4 3
♦10 9
♣J 9 5 4 3
N
WE
S
♠10 4 3
♥K 10 9 8 7
♦Q 5 3 2
♣A
♠A K Q 5
♥Q J
♦A K J 4
♣7 6 2

N 6N; N 6♠; S 5N; S 5♠; N 5♦; S 4♦; NS 4♣; NS 1♥; Par +990

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS54606.930.071-Cherry-Cherry vs 12-Wilson-Jones
3 NTS34005.211.797-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 11-Huston-Holley
3 NTS34005.211.798-Levy-Kelley vs 1-Hempel-Noga
3 ♥S41703.503.5011-Smades-Smith vs 8-High-Druffel
2 ♠S31402.364.649-Richardson-Boyd vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 NTS−1501.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 2-Petersen-Miller
4 ♠S−31500.076.9310-Deyager-Infausto vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
♠7 2
♥Q 9 8 3 2
♦K 7 6 3
♣10 8
♠Q 9 8 5 4
♥J 6
♦10 8
♣A 9 6 4
N
WE
S
♠A K 10
♥K 10
♦A J 5
♣K Q J 7 5
♠J 6 3
♥A 7 5 4
♦Q 9 4 2
♣3 2

EW 6♠; EW 6♣; EW 5N; EW 1♥; EW 1♦; Par −1430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♣E66207.000.0010-Deyager-Infausto vs 5-Burden-Tweed
4 ♠E56506.001.008-Levy-Kelley vs 12-Wilson-Jones
3 NTE56605.002.009-Richardson-Boyd vs 2-Petersen-Miller
4 ♠W66802.504.502-Newel-Newel vs 1-Hempel-Noga
4 ♠E66802.504.503-Waller-Johnson vs 3-Town-Wiedel
4 ♠E66802.504.5011-Smades-Smith vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
4 ♠W66802.504.5012-Gearhart-Hiney vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
3 NTE66900.007.001-Cherry-Cherry vs 11-Huston-Holley

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
♠10 9 3
♥A 9 6 4
♦K Q 10 3
♣8 5
♠A 7 6 5 4
♥8 3 2
♦A J 8 5
♣2
N
WE
S
♠J 2
♥J
♦9 7 6 4
♣A J 10 9 7 3
♠K Q 8
♥K Q 10 7 5
♦2
♣K Q 6 4

NS 4N; NS 3♥; NS 1♠; NS 1♣; Par +430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥S44206.500.501-Cherry-Cherry vs 11-Huston-Holley
4 ♥S44206.500.502-Newel-Newel vs 1-Hempel-Noga
2 ♥S31404.003.009-Richardson-Boyd vs 2-Petersen-Miller
3 ♥S31404.003.0010-Deyager-Infausto vs 5-Burden-Tweed
3 ♥S31404.003.0012-Gearhart-Hiney vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
4 ♥E−1502.005.003-Waller-Johnson vs 3-Town-Wiedel
4 ♥S−1500.506.508-Levy-Kelley vs 12-Wilson-Jones
4 ♥S−1500.506.5011-Smades-Smith vs 7-Rogers-Rogers

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠5 4 2
♥K 8 3 2
♦J 10 8 6
♣K 4
♠A K 7
♥A J
♦Q 9 3
♣A J 10 8 6
N
WE
S
♠Q 9 8 6
♥Q 10 9 5
♦7 4
♣7 5 2
♠J 10 3
♥7 6 4
♦A K 5 2
♣Q 9 3

EW 3N; EW 3♠; EW 2♥; EW 3♣; EW 1♦; Par −600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−11007.000.003-Waller-Johnson vs 3-Town-Wiedel
1 NTW21204.502.501-Cherry-Cherry vs 11-Huston-Holley
1 NTW21204.502.502-Newel-Newel vs 1-Hempel-Noga
2 NTW21204.502.509-Richardson-Boyd vs 2-Petersen-Miller
2 NTW21204.502.5011-Smades-Smith vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
2 NTW31501.505.508-Levy-Kelley vs 12-Wilson-Jones
1 NTW31501.505.5010-Deyager-Infausto vs 5-Burden-Tweed
3 NTW36000.007.0012-Gearhart-Hiney vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
♠K Q J 7 4 3
♥K Q
♦J 2
♣8 3 2
♠—
♥J
♦9 8 7 6 4
♣K Q 10 9 6 5 4
N
WE
S
♠A 9 8 5 2
♥10 9 6 3
♦K 10 5
♣7
♠10 6
♥A 8 7 5 4 2
♦A Q 3
♣A J

N 5N; NS 5♠; S 5♥; S 4N; N 4♥; EW 2♣; EW 1♦; Par +660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥S56506.930.073-Waller-Johnson vs 2-Petersen-Miller
4 ♠N46205.791.214-Clark-Berry vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 ♠N52004.642.362-Newel-Newel vs 12-Wilson-Jones
3 ♥S41703.503.5011-Smades-Smith vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
4 ♠N−11001.215.799-Richardson-Boyd vs 1-Hempel-Noga
4 ♥S−11001.215.7910-Deyager-Infausto vs 3-Town-Wiedel
4 ♠N−11001.215.7912-Gearhart-Hiney vs 8-High-Druffel

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
♠J 9 7
♥Q 8 4
♦K 10 9 5
♣J 5 4
♠10 6 3
♥7 6 5
♦Q 6 3
♣Q 9 8 6
N
WE
S
♠Q 8 5 4
♥A K
♦7 4 2
♣A K 3 2
♠A K 2
♥J 10 9 3 2
♦A J 8
♣10 7

NS 3♥; NS 1N; NS 2♦; EW 1♣; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♥S41706.930.073-Waller-Johnson vs 2-Petersen-Miller
2 ♥S21105.211.794-Clark-Berry vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 ♥S21105.211.799-Richardson-Boyd vs 1-Hempel-Noga
2 ♠E−21003.503.5012-Gearhart-Hiney vs 8-High-Druffel
3 ♣W−1501.795.212-Newel-Newel vs 12-Wilson-Jones
2 ♠W−1501.795.2111-Smades-Smith vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
2 ♣W31100.076.9310-Deyager-Infausto vs 3-Town-Wiedel

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
♠8 7 6
♥K 9 8
♦K 10 9 4 3
♣K 7
♠K J 2
♥A J 2
♦A J 8 7
♣9 8 6
N
WE
S
♠10 5 4 3
♥10 6
♦—
♣Q J 10 5 4 3 2
♠A Q 9
♥Q 7 5 4 3
♦Q 6 5 2
♣A

S 3♥; S 4♦; EW 4♣; N 2♥; N 3♦; NS 1N; EW 1♠; Par +100: EW 5♣×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♥S41705.791.214-Clark-Berry vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 ♥S41705.791.219-Richardson-Boyd vs 1-Hempel-Noga
3 ♥S41705.791.2110-Deyager-Infausto vs 3-Town-Wiedel
3 ♥S31403.503.503-Waller-Johnson vs 2-Petersen-Miller
3 NTW−1502.364.6411-Smades-Smith vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
2 NTW21201.215.7912-Gearhart-Hiney vs 8-High-Druffel
2 NTS−22000.076.932-Newel-Newel vs 12-Wilson-Jones

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
♠A K Q J 9 2
♥A J 9
♦—
♣A Q 7 3
♠10 5
♥K 8 4 2
♦K J 10 4
♣9 8 5
N
WE
S
♠8 7 6
♥Q 3
♦9 8 7 6 3 2
♣K 4
♠4 3
♥10 7 6 5
♦A Q 5
♣J 10 6 2

S 5N; NS 5♠; N 3N; NS 5♣; NS 3♥; EW 2♦; Par +660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 ♠N614306.500.501-Cherry-Cherry vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
6 ♠S614306.500.504-Clark-Berry vs 3-Town-Wiedel
4 ♠N56503.503.502-Newel-Newel vs 11-Huston-Holley
4 ♠N56503.503.503-Waller-Johnson vs 1-Hempel-Noga
4 ♠N56503.503.505-Creede-Heisdorf vs 5-Burden-Tweed
4 ♠N56503.503.5010-Deyager-Infausto vs 2-Petersen-Miller
6 ♠N−11001.006.0012-Gearhart-Hiney vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
6 ♠N−22000.007.0011-Smades-Smith vs 4-Pash-Cohen

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
♠6 2
♥K 6 3
♦7 5 2
♣A 10 5 3 2
♠K 10 8
♥9 8 2
♦10 9
♣K Q 8 7 6
N
WE
S
♠7 4
♥A Q J 7 5 4
♦K 8 4 3
♣J
♠A Q J 9 5 3
♥10
♦A Q J 6
♣9 4

N 3♠; S 2♠; EW 2♥; N 1N; N 2♦; S 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠S44207.000.001-Cherry-Cherry vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
5 ♥×E−23006.001.003-Waller-Johnson vs 1-Hempel-Noga
3 ♠S31405.002.0012-Gearhart-Hiney vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
2 ♠S21104.003.004-Clark-Berry vs 3-Town-Wiedel
3 ♥E−21003.004.0011-Smades-Smith vs 4-Pash-Cohen
4 ♠S−21002.005.0010-Deyager-Infausto vs 2-Petersen-Miller
3 ♥E31401.006.005-Creede-Heisdorf vs 5-Burden-Tweed
4 ♠×S−23000.007.002-Newel-Newel vs 11-Huston-Holley

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
♠A K Q 7 5 4
♥K Q J 10 9 2
♦2
♣—
♠2
♥A 7 3
♦A K Q 8
♣Q J 8 7 3
N
WE
S
♠J 6
♥6
♦J 10 7 6 5 4
♣K 10 5 2
♠10 9 8 3
♥8 5 4
♦9 3
♣A 9 6 4

NS 4♥; W 5♦; EW 5♣; NS 3♠; E 4♦; Par −200: NS 5♥×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥×N59907.000.004-Clark-Berry vs 3-Town-Wiedel
5 ♠×N58506.001.0012-Gearhart-Hiney vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
5 ♠N66804.502.501-Cherry-Cherry vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
5 ♠N66804.502.502-Newel-Newel vs 11-Huston-Holley
5 ♠S56501.505.503-Waller-Johnson vs 1-Hempel-Noga
4 ♠N56501.505.505-Creede-Heisdorf vs 5-Burden-Tweed
4 ♠N56501.505.5010-Deyager-Infausto vs 2-Petersen-Miller
4 ♥N56501.505.5011-Smades-Smith vs 4-Pash-Cohen

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
♠J 5 4 2
♥10 7 4 3
♦K Q 8
♣7 5
♠K Q 10 9 8
♥A 6
♦A 2
♣A 10 4 3
N
WE
S
♠A 7
♥K
♦J 10 9 6 5 4
♣K Q 9 6
♠6 3
♥Q J 9 8 5 2
♦7 3
♣J 8 2

EW 6N; EW 6♠; EW 6♣; EW 5♦; EW 1♥; Par −1440

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠W52006.930.074-Clark-Berry vs 2-Petersen-Miller
5 ♣W66205.211.793-Waller-Johnson vs 12-Wilson-Jones
5 ♣W66205.211.7912-Gearhart-Hiney vs 5-Burden-Tweed
4 ♠W56503.503.505-Creede-Heisdorf vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 NTW66901.795.211-Cherry-Cherry vs 8-High-Druffel
3 NTW66901.795.2111-Smades-Smith vs 3-Town-Wiedel
6 ♣W613700.076.936-Brock-McGinnis vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
♠K Q 9 8 3
♥3 2
♦Q 4
♣Q 8 5 2
♠A 6 4 2
♥A K J 9 7
♦K
♣K 6 3
N
WE
S
♠J 10 5
♥Q 10 6
♦10 7 6 5 2
♣A 4
♠7
♥8 5 4
♦A J 9 8 3
♣J 10 9 7

EW 3♥; EW 2N; EW 2♠; EW 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥W−21006.930.071-Cherry-Cherry vs 8-High-Druffel
4 ♥W−1505.791.214-Clark-Berry vs 2-Petersen-Miller
3 ♥W31404.642.363-Waller-Johnson vs 12-Wilson-Jones
2 ♥W41703.503.505-Creede-Heisdorf vs 4-Pash-Cohen
4 ♥W44202.364.6411-Smades-Smith vs 3-Town-Wiedel
4 ♥W64801.215.7912-Gearhart-Hiney vs 5-Burden-Tweed
4 ♥W75100.076.936-Brock-McGinnis vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠7
♥A Q 5 4
♦9 7 5 3
♣K J 4 3
♠K J 8
♥K J 9 8 7 6 2
♦Q 10
♣A
N
WE
S
♠10 5
♥10 3
♦A J 6 4 2
♣Q 8 6 2
♠A Q 9 6 4 3 2
♥—
♦K 8
♣10 9 7 5

NS 3♠; EW 2♥; NS 3♣; EW 1N; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥×W−23006.360.641-Cherry-Cherry vs 8-High-Druffel
4 ♥×W−23006.360.6411-Smades-Smith vs 3-Town-Wiedel
4 ♥W−21003.503.503-Waller-Johnson vs 12-Wilson-Jones
4 ♥W−21003.503.505-Creede-Heisdorf vs 4-Pash-Cohen
4 ♥W−21003.503.506-Brock-McGinnis vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
3 ♠S−11001.215.794-Clark-Berry vs 2-Petersen-Miller
4 ♠S−22000.076.9312-Gearhart-Hiney vs 5-Burden-Tweed

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠J 6 3
♥9 6
♦8 3 2
♣Q 10 7 3 2
♠Q 8 5
♥A Q 10
♦A K J 10 9
♣K 8
N
WE
S
♠A K 10 9 2
♥K J 8 5 3 2
♦—
♣6 5
♠7 4
♥7 4
♦Q 7 6 5 4
♣A J 9 4

EW 6N; EW 6♠; EW 6♥; EW 4♦; EW 2♣; Par −1440

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♦W−33007.000.002-Newel-Newel vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
3 NTW66905.002.001-Cherry-Cherry vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
3 NTW66905.002.007-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
3 NTW66905.002.0012-Gearhart-Hiney vs 4-Pash-Cohen
4 ♥E77103.004.005-Creede-Heisdorf vs 3-Town-Wiedel
6 ♥E614302.005.006-Brock-McGinnis vs 5-Burden-Tweed
6 NTW614401.006.003-Waller-Johnson vs 11-Huston-Holley
6 ♥W714600.007.004-Clark-Berry vs 1-Hempel-Noga

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
♠Q 9
♥J 8 5 3 2
♦A 5
♣10 9 6 4
♠A K J 3
♥K
♦J 10
♣A K J 7 5 3
N
WE
S
♠10 8 6 4 2
♥A 10 9 7
♦K 4 3 2
♣—
♠7 5
♥Q 6 4
♦Q 9 8 7 6
♣Q 8 2

EW 6♠; EW 4N; EW 3♥; EW 4♣; EW 3♦; Par −1430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠E56506.500.501-Cherry-Cherry vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
4 ♠E56506.500.507-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
4 ♠W66803.004.002-Newel-Newel vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
4 ♠W66803.004.003-Waller-Johnson vs 11-Huston-Holley
4 ♠W66803.004.004-Clark-Berry vs 1-Hempel-Noga
4 ♠E66803.004.006-Brock-McGinnis vs 5-Burden-Tweed
4 ♠E66803.004.0012-Gearhart-Hiney vs 4-Pash-Cohen
4 ♠W77100.007.005-Creede-Heisdorf vs 3-Town-Wiedel

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠A 10 9
♥Q J 3
♦Q 8 4 2
♣A K 2
♠6 4 3 2
♥A 9
♦10 9
♣Q 10 6 4 3
N
WE
S
♠Q 7 5
♥K 8 7 6 5 4
♦A K 7 5
♣—
♠K J 8
♥10 2
♦J 6 3
♣J 9 8 7 5

EW 2♥; NS 1N; EW 1♠; NS 1♣; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♥E−1505.501.502-Newel-Newel vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
2 ♥E−1505.501.504-Clark-Berry vs 1-Hempel-Noga
2 ♥E−1505.501.506-Brock-McGinnis vs 5-Burden-Tweed
2 ♥E−1505.501.507-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
2 ♥E21103.004.003-Waller-Johnson vs 11-Huston-Holley
2 ♥E31401.505.501-Cherry-Cherry vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
2 ♥E31401.505.505-Creede-Heisdorf vs 3-Town-Wiedel
4 ♠E64800.007.0012-Gearhart-Hiney vs 4-Pash-Cohen

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠A
♥6 5
♦A J 9 4 3
♣A 10 8 5 4
♠Q 8 4 2
♥A J 10
♦10 8
♣Q J 6 3
N
WE
S
♠K J 7 5
♥K Q 9 7
♦6 5 2
♣7 2
♠10 9 6 3
♥8 4 3 2
♦K Q 7
♣K 9

NS 5♦; NS 4♣; NS 2N; EW 1♠; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♥E−22006.930.072-Newel-Newel vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
2 ♦N51505.791.215-Creede-Heisdorf vs 2-Petersen-Miller
2 ♦N41304.642.367-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
1 NTN21202.934.071-Cherry-Cherry vs 5-Burden-Tweed
2 NTN21202.934.074-Clark-Berry vs 12-Wilson-Jones
PassPass1.215.796-Brock-McGinnis vs 4-Pash-Cohen
4 ♦N−1500.076.938-Levy-Kelley vs 8-High-Druffel

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
♠8 2
♥Q 9
♦J 4 3 2
♣K J 9 8 6
♠A 9 6 3
♥5
♦8 6 5
♣A 7 5 3 2
N
WE
S
♠K 5
♥A K 4 3 2
♦Q 10 9 7
♣Q 10
♠Q J 10 7 4
♥J 10 8 7 6
♦A K
♣4

EW 1N; EW 2♦; EW 2♣; EW 1♠; EW 1♥; Par −90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♥E−22006.360.641-Cherry-Cherry vs 5-Burden-Tweed
1 ♥E−22006.360.648-Levy-Kelley vs 8-High-Druffel
1 NTN21204.642.365-Creede-Heisdorf vs 2-Petersen-Miller
1 ♥E−11003.503.506-Brock-McGinnis vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 NTN−11002.364.644-Clark-Berry vs 12-Wilson-Jones
3 NTN−22001.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
3 NTN−33000.076.937-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
♠J 10
♥7 6 3 2
♦K Q 6
♣Q J 9 3
♠K 7 6
♥A K 9
♦10 9 4 2
♣10 8 5
N
WE
S
♠8 4 3 2
♥Q J 5
♦A 8 7 5
♣K 2
♠A Q 9 5
♥10 8 4
♦J 3
♣A 7 6 4

NS 2N; NS 2♣; NS 1♠; NS 1♥; EW 1♦; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTN31506.930.071-Cherry-Cherry vs 5-Burden-Tweed
1 NTN1905.211.792-Newel-Newel vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
2 ♣S2905.211.795-Creede-Heisdorf vs 2-Petersen-Miller
2 ♦E−1503.503.504-Clark-Berry vs 12-Wilson-Jones
PassPass2.364.646-Brock-McGinnis vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 ♥N−1501.215.797-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
3 ♣S−21000.076.938-Levy-Kelley vs 8-High-Druffel

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠Q 8 2
♥10 5 4 3
♦K Q J 6 4
♣Q
♠K 10 6
♥K Q 8 6 2
♦10 5
♣K 9 2
N
WE
S
♠A 9
♥A J 7
♦A 8
♣A J 10 8 6 3
♠J 7 5 4 3
♥9
♦9 7 3 2
♣7 5 4

EW 7N; EW 7♥; EW 7♣; EW 1♠; NS 1♦; Par −2220

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♣E71907.000.008-Levy-Kelley vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
5 ♣E76405.501.503-Waller-Johnson vs 8-High-Druffel
5 ♣E76405.501.507-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 5-Burden-Tweed
4 ♥W77102.504.504-Clark-Berry vs 11-Huston-Holley
4 ♥E77102.504.505-Creede-Heisdorf vs 1-Hempel-Noga
4 ♥W77102.504.506-Brock-McGinnis vs 3-Town-Wiedel
4 ♥W77102.504.509-Richardson-Boyd vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
6 ♥W714600.007.002-Newel-Newel vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
♠K Q 6 4
♥6 3
♦3
♣A 10 7 6 5 4
♠10 7
♥Q 8 4
♦K Q 9 7 6
♣J 9 3
N
WE
S
♠A J 8 3
♥10 9 7 2
♦A 10 4
♣Q 8
♠9 5 2
♥A K J 5
♦J 8 5 2
♣K 2

NS 2♠; NS 3♣; EW 1N; EW 1♦; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS41807.000.003-Waller-Johnson vs 8-High-Druffel
2 ♠N31405.501.505-Creede-Heisdorf vs 1-Hempel-Noga
1 ♠N31405.501.507-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 5-Burden-Tweed
2 ♠N21104.003.009-Richardson-Boyd vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
PassPass3.004.008-Levy-Kelley vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
2 NTS−11002.005.006-Brock-McGinnis vs 3-Town-Wiedel
3 NTS−44000.506.502-Newel-Newel vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
3 NTS−44000.506.504-Clark-Berry vs 11-Huston-Holley

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
♠7 6 4
♥K 7 2
♦K 3 2
♣Q 7 6 5
♠A K 9
♥J 4
♦Q J 10 9 8
♣K 8 3
N
WE
S
♠5 2
♥Q 10 8 6 5
♦A 6 4
♣J 9 4
♠Q J 10 8 3
♥A 9 3
♦7 5
♣A 10 2

EW 2N; EW 2♥; EW 3♦; NS 1♠; EW 1♣; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−21007.000.006-Brock-McGinnis vs 3-Town-Wiedel
4 ♦W−1504.502.502-Newel-Newel vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
3 NTW−1504.502.503-Waller-Johnson vs 8-High-Druffel
3 ♦W−1504.502.508-Levy-Kelley vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
2 NTW−1504.502.509-Richardson-Boyd vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
2 ♦W2901.505.505-Creede-Heisdorf vs 1-Hempel-Noga
1 NTW1901.505.507-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 5-Burden-Tweed
3 NTW34000.007.004-Clark-Berry vs 11-Huston-Holley

Board 28
West Deals
N-S Vul
♠10 7 2
♥K J
♦K J 8
♣K Q J 10 7
♠A 8 5 4
♥10 7 6 3
♦7 6 4
♣A 8
N
WE
S
♠Q J 9 6
♥A 5 4
♦Q 5 3
♣9 5 4
♠K 3
♥Q 9 8 2
♦A 10 9 2
♣6 3 2

NS 3♦; NS 3♣; NS 1N; EW 1♠; NS 1♥; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTN21206.930.073-Waller-Johnson vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
2 ♣N2904.072.935-Creede-Heisdorf vs 12-Wilson-Jones
1 NTN1904.072.936-Brock-McGinnis vs 2-Petersen-Miller
1 NTN1904.072.937-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 ♣N2904.072.938-Levy-Kelley vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
3 NTN−22000.646.364-Clark-Berry vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
3 NTS−22000.646.369-Richardson-Boyd vs 8-High-Druffel

Board 29
North Deals
Both Vul
♠Q 9 8 7
♥A 5 2
♦A 6 5 4
♣8 2
♠A 4
♥Q 8 6
♦K Q 10 7 3
♣K J 9
N
WE
S
♠J 10 5 3
♥K 9 7 4 3
♦9
♣Q 7 4
♠K 6 2
♥J 10
♦J 8 2
♣A 10 6 5 3

EW 2N; EW 2♥; EW 1♠; EW 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♦W−11006.930.076-Brock-McGinnis vs 2-Petersen-Miller
2 ♥E21105.791.218-Levy-Kelley vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
2 NTW21204.072.933-Waller-Johnson vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
2 NTW21204.072.937-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 4-Pash-Cohen
1 NTW31502.364.644-Clark-Berry vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
2 ♥E41701.215.795-Creede-Heisdorf vs 12-Wilson-Jones
3 NTE36000.076.939-Richardson-Boyd vs 8-High-Druffel

Board 30
East Deals
None Vul
♠K 10 8 6 2
♥A J 6 5
♦Q J
♣5 3
♠A J 5
♥K Q 4 2
♦8 6 4
♣Q 10 7
N
WE
S
♠Q 9 7
♥10 9 3
♦A 10 7
♣A 8 4 2
♠4 3
♥8 7
♦K 9 5 3 2
♣K J 9 6

EW 1N; S 2♦; NS 1♠; N 1♦; S 1♣; Par +90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠N21106.930.077-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 ♣W−21005.791.214-Clark-Berry vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
1 NTS1904.642.369-Richardson-Boyd vs 8-High-Druffel
2 ♣W−1503.503.506-Brock-McGinnis vs 2-Petersen-Miller
1 NTE1901.795.215-Creede-Heisdorf vs 12-Wilson-Jones
1 NTE1901.795.218-Levy-Kelley vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
2 NTS−31500.076.933-Waller-Johnson vs 7-Rogers-Rogers

Board 31
South Deals
N-S Vul
♠Q 10 8 4 3
♥Q 9
♦A K 4 2
♣J 10
♠9 6
♥A J 10 6 4
♦Q 3
♣A 9 7 3
N
WE
S
♠A J 7 2
♥K 8 7 5 3 2
♦10
♣4 2
♠K 5
♥—
♦J 9 8 7 6 5
♣K Q 8 6 5

EW 4♥; NS 5♦; EW 1N; NS 1♠; NS 1♣; Par +100: EW 5♥×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♥W41706.930.0711-Smades-Smith vs 11-Huston-Holley
4 ♥W44202.934.074-Clark-Berry vs 8-High-Druffel
4 ♥E44202.934.076-Brock-McGinnis vs 1-Hempel-Noga
4 ♥W44202.934.077-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 3-Town-Wiedel
4 ♥W44202.934.078-Levy-Kelley vs 5-Burden-Tweed
4 ♥E44202.934.079-Richardson-Boyd vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
4 ♥W44202.934.0710-Deyager-Infausto vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer

Board 32
West Deals
E-W Vul
♠10 7 6 2
♥Q 9 6
♦Q J
♣A K J 9
♠5
♥K 7 4
♦10 6 5 4
♣10 8 5 3 2
N
WE
S
♠A K Q 4 3
♥J 2
♦K 9 8 3 2
♣4
♠J 9 8
♥A 10 8 5 3
♦A 7
♣Q 7 6

NS 3N; NS 3♥; EW 3♦; NS 2♣; Par +200: EW 4♦×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♥S31406.930.074-Clark-Berry vs 8-High-Druffel
3 ♥S−1505.211.797-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 3-Town-Wiedel
4 ♥S−1505.211.7911-Smades-Smith vs 11-Huston-Holley
4 ♣N−21001.795.216-Brock-McGinnis vs 1-Hempel-Noga
3 ♥S−21001.795.218-Levy-Kelley vs 5-Burden-Tweed
4 ♥S−21001.795.219-Richardson-Boyd vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
2 ♥N−21001.795.2110-Deyager-Infausto vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer

Board 33
North Deals
None Vul
♠10 5 4
♥A 10 5 4 3
♦A K Q
♣4 3
♠A 7
♥Q J 9 8
♦J 8 6 4
♣Q 8 5
N
WE
S
♠J 9 6 2
♥K 7 2
♦10 9 2
♣K 7 2
♠K Q 8 3
♥6
♦7 5 3
♣A J 10 9 6

NS 3♠; NS 4♣; NS 2N; NS 2♥; NS 2♦; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN34006.360.647-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 3-Town-Wiedel
3 NTN34006.360.6411-Smades-Smith vs 11-Huston-Holley
2 NTN31504.642.368-Levy-Kelley vs 5-Burden-Tweed
3 ♠S31402.934.076-Brock-McGinnis vs 1-Hempel-Noga
2 ♠S31402.934.0710-Deyager-Infausto vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
3 NTS−1501.215.799-Richardson-Boyd vs 7-Rogers-Rogers
3 NTN−31500.076.934-Clark-Berry vs 8-High-Druffel

Board 34
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠K 8 3
♥A 9 3
♦8 2
♣A Q 9 8 4
♠A 5
♥J 6
♦A Q J 7 4 3
♣K J 6
N
WE
S
♠10 7 6 4 2
♥Q 7 4
♦10 9
♣10 3 2
♠Q J 9
♥K 10 8 5 2
♦K 6 5
♣7 5

S 4♥; N 3♥; S 2♠; S 3♣; S 1N; N 2♣; N 1♠; S 1♦; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♥S41706.930.075-Creede-Heisdorf vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
2 ♥S31405.211.797-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 2-Petersen-Miller
2 ♥S31405.211.798-Levy-Kelley vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 ♦W−1503.503.506-Brock-McGinnis vs 11-Huston-Holley
1 NTW21202.364.649-Richardson-Boyd vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
4 ♣N−22000.646.3610-Deyager-Infausto vs 8-High-Druffel
3 ♥S−22000.646.3612-Gearhart-Hiney vs 12-Wilson-Jones

Board 35
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠K Q 9 6 2
♥J 10 2
♦Q 5 4
♣K 3
♠J 10
♥7 4 3
♦8 6 2
♣Q 9 8 7 4
N
WE
S
♠8
♥A Q 9 8 6 5
♦A 10 9
♣A J 5
♠A 7 5 4 3
♥K
♦K J 7 3
♣10 6 2

N 4♠; S 3♠; EW 2♥; N 3♦; S 2♦; EW 1♣; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N54506.930.075-Creede-Heisdorf vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
4 ♠N44203.503.506-Brock-McGinnis vs 11-Huston-Holley
4 ♠S44203.503.507-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 2-Petersen-Miller
4 ♠N44203.503.508-Levy-Kelley vs 4-Pash-Cohen
4 ♠S44203.503.509-Richardson-Boyd vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
4 ♠N44203.503.5010-Deyager-Infausto vs 8-High-Druffel
3 ♠S31400.076.9312-Gearhart-Hiney vs 12-Wilson-Jones

Board 36
West Deals
Both Vul
♠A K Q 4
♥J 10 7 3 2
♦K 6
♣K 4
♠7
♥K 9 8
♦A Q 10 9 8 4 2
♣8 2
N
WE
S
♠9 5
♥Q 6 4
♦J 7 5 3
♣A J 10 3
♠J 10 8 6 3 2
♥A 5
♦—
♣Q 9 7 6 5

NS 5♠; S 3♥; NS 2N; N 2♥; EW 3♦; NS 3♣; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠S66806.930.079-Richardson-Boyd vs 6-Laquerriere-Hampton
4 ♠S56504.072.935-Creede-Heisdorf vs 9-Blanchard-Zimmerer
4 ♠S56504.072.936-Brock-McGinnis vs 11-Huston-Holley
4 ♠S56504.072.938-Levy-Kelley vs 4-Pash-Cohen
4 ♠N56504.072.9310-Deyager-Infausto vs 8-High-Druffel
4 ♥N−11001.215.797-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 2-Petersen-Miller
4 ♥N−22000.076.9312-Gearhart-Hiney vs 12-Wilson-Jones