750 Thursday Aft Session April 16, 2015
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  B  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  6   67.82  113.94  C   1     1     1    0.88(A)  Marilyn J. Kendall - Bill Burns
  3   67.35  113.15  C   2     2     2    0.62(A)  Deb Petersen - Cynthia Tingey
 10   61.15  102.73  C   3     3          0.44(A)  Joan Deyager - Marsha Infausto
  4   51.92   87.22  B   4     4          0.31(A)  Mary Ann Clark - Gay Berry
  7   51.63   86.74  A                             John Oakshott - Peggy Oakshott
  1   47.49   79.79  C                             Carol Willoughby - Judy Geary
  5   40.73   68.43  B                             Patricia Creede - Sue Gearhart
  9   37.97   63.79  B                             Elaine Smith - Joan James
  8   37.15   62.42  C                             Barbara Kelley - Carol Levy
  2   36.81   61.84  C                             Jeremy Newel - Michael Newel
750 Thursday Aft Session April 16, 2015
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  B  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  7   61.18  102.78  C   1     1     1    0.88(A)  Don Myers - Doris Myers
  3   60.70  101.98  C   2     2     2    0.62(A)  Linda Town - Barbara Wiedel
  4   57.87   97.22  A   3                0.44(A)  Linda Coppersmith - George Efthemon
  1   57.35   96.34  C   4     3          0.32(B)  John Hempel - Jerry F. Noga
  5   55.68   93.55  B                             Angelina Heisdorf - Barry Druffel
  6   52.39   88.01  A                             Estee Strombotne - Suzanne Graham
  8   52.19   87.68  B                             Larry Miller - Beverly Daniels
  9   51.95   87.27  A                             Sandy Richardson - Paul Boyd
  2   44.98   75.57  C                             Karin Blanchard - Lois High
 10   27.94   46.94  C                             Anna Harguindeguy - Helen Smades
 11   25.88   43.47  C                             Carol Smith - Jane A. McCoy

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
A K Q 8
8 4
J 10 9 7 5 4
9
10 6 4 2
J 9 7 5 3 2
2
6 5
N
WE
S
J
A K 6
A 8 3
A Q 7 4 3 2
9 7 5 3
Q 10
K Q 6
K J 10 8

EW 4; EW 2N; NS 3; EW 2; NS 1; Par −300: NS 5×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N31106.930.076-Kendall-Burns vs 11-Smith-McCoy
4 W−21005.791.2110-Deyager-Infausto vs 8-Miller-Daniels
3 N−1504.642.369-Smith-James vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
3 E31103.503.507-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 2-Blanchard-High
3 W31402.364.641-Willoughby-Geary vs 1-Hempel-Noga
4 ×S−23000.646.365-Creede-Gearhart vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
4 ×N−23000.646.368-Kelley-Levy vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
2
A 8 6 5 3
Q J 10 7
A K 9
K Q 7 6 5 3
J
K 9
8 5 4 2
N
WE
S
10 8
K 10 4 2
A 6 4
Q 10 7 6
A J 9 4
Q 9 7
8 5 3 2
J 3

NS 2; NS 3; EW 2; EW 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N21106.930.076-Kendall-Burns vs 11-Smith-McCoy
3 E−1505.211.798-Kelley-Levy vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
3 W−1505.211.799-Smith-James vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
3 N−11003.503.505-Creede-Gearhart vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
2 W21102.364.6410-Deyager-Infausto vs 8-Miller-Daniels
4 N−22001.215.797-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 2-Blanchard-High
2 NTS−33000.076.931-Willoughby-Geary vs 1-Hempel-Noga

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
J 5 3 2
J 8 5
8 5 4
K 6 2
A 10 7
10 7 2
J 2
A Q 9 8 3
N
WE
S
Q 9 8
K Q 3
K Q 10 7 6
J 7
K 6 4
A 9 6 4
A 9 3
10 5 4

EW 3N; EW 4; EW 2; EW 2; EW 3; Par −600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−11006.930.075-Creede-Gearhart vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
2 S−21005.791.219-Smith-James vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
2 E31104.642.367-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 2-Blanchard-High
2 NTE21202.934.076-Kendall-Burns vs 11-Smith-McCoy
2 NTE21202.934.078-Kelley-Levy vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
2 NTW41801.215.7910-Deyager-Infausto vs 8-Miller-Daniels
3 NTE36000.076.931-Willoughby-Geary vs 1-Hempel-Noga

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
7
J 6 2
Q 10 9 6 5 2
Q 10 7
Q 8 3
K Q 9 3
8 3
9 8 4 2
N
WE
S
A J 10
10 8 5 4
A J 4
A K J
K 9 6 5 4 2
A 7
K 7
6 5 3

EW 4N; E 4; W 3; E 4; E 2; W 3; W 1; E 1; Par −630

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−22006.360.641-Willoughby-Geary vs 11-Smith-McCoy
4 W−22006.360.646-Kendall-Burns vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 W31404.642.3610-Deyager-Infausto vs 7-Myers-Myers
2 NTE41803.503.508-Kelley-Levy vs 3-Town-Wiedel
3 NTE36002.364.647-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 1-Hempel-Noga
3 NTE46301.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 2-Blanchard-High
4 ×S−617000.076.939-Smith-James vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
J 9 6
Q 7
10 9 6 4 3
A J 2
A 10 8
A 6 4 2
K J 7
10 5 3
N
WE
S
5 2
K J 9 5 3
A Q 5 2
Q 7
K Q 7 4 3
10 8
8
K 9 8 6 4

EW 4N; EW 4; NS 3; NS 3; EW 2; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−1505.791.211-Willoughby-Geary vs 11-Smith-McCoy
4 W−1505.791.216-Kendall-Burns vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
4 E−1505.791.217-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 1-Hempel-Noga
3 E52003.503.508-Kelley-Levy vs 3-Town-Wiedel
4 E44201.795.212-Newel-Newel vs 2-Blanchard-High
4 E44201.795.2110-Deyager-Infausto vs 7-Myers-Myers
4 E54500.076.939-Smith-James vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
K Q 9 6 5 3
Q 10 9 3
9
9 2
A 10 7 2
4
J 8 7 2
A 8 6 5
N
WE
S
J 4
K 7
A Q 10 5 4
Q J 10 4
8
A J 8 6 5 2
K 6 3
K 7 3

NS 3; EW 4; EW 4; E 1N; NS 1; Par −100: NS 4×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S41706.930.071-Willoughby-Geary vs 11-Smith-McCoy
4 S−1504.642.366-Kendall-Burns vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
4 S−1504.642.369-Smith-James vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel
4 S−1504.642.3610-Deyager-Infausto vs 7-Myers-Myers
4 S−21001.795.212-Newel-Newel vs 2-Blanchard-High
4 S−21001.795.217-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 1-Hempel-Noga
3 E41300.076.938-Kelley-Levy vs 3-Town-Wiedel

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
K J 10 7
8 7
K Q J 9
J 9 8
9 5 3
J 10 6 4
A 10 6
Q 7 4
N
WE
S
Q 4
K Q 3
8 7 3 2
A K 6 2
A 8 6 2
A 9 5 2
5 4
10 5 3

NS 2; EW 1; EW 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S41706.930.071-Willoughby-Geary vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
2 N21105.791.217-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 11-Smith-McCoy
2 E−11004.642.3610-Deyager-Infausto vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
2 N−11003.503.509-Smith-James vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
1 NTW21202.364.643-Petersen-Tingey vs 3-Town-Wiedel
1 NTW31501.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 1-Hempel-Noga
1 ×W23600.076.938-Kelley-Levy vs 2-Blanchard-High

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
K Q J
Q J 4
8 2
J 9 8 7 4
10 7 2
7 2
A J 10 5 4 3
Q 10
N
WE
S
9 6 5
A K 9 3
9 6
A 6 5 2
A 8 4 3
10 8 6 5
K Q 7
K 3

NS 2; NS 2; EW 2; NS 2; Par +100: EW 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E−31506.930.078-Kelley-Levy vs 2-Blanchard-High
2 NTN21205.791.217-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 11-Smith-McCoy
2 W−1504.642.363-Petersen-Tingey vs 3-Town-Wiedel
2 W2903.503.5010-Deyager-Infausto vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
1 NTN−21001.795.212-Newel-Newel vs 1-Hempel-Noga
3 N−21001.795.219-Smith-James vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
3 NTS−52500.076.931-Willoughby-Geary vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
Q 9 7 4
K 4
A K 4
A K 9 3
J 8 5
A J 10 8 7 5 2
Q 8
6
N
WE
S
10
Q 3
J 10 9 7 3 2
10 8 5 2
A K 6 3 2
9 6
6 5
Q J 7 4

NS 6N; NS 6; NS 6; NS 2; Par +990

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 S69806.930.077-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 11-Smith-McCoy
4 S64804.072.931-Willoughby-Geary vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
4 S64804.072.932-Newel-Newel vs 1-Hempel-Noga
4 S64804.072.933-Petersen-Tingey vs 3-Town-Wiedel
4 S64804.072.938-Kelley-Levy vs 2-Blanchard-High
3 NTN54601.215.7910-Deyager-Infausto vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
3 N−21000.076.939-Smith-James vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
A 7 3 2
Q 9
J
J 10 8 7 4 2
Q J 10 9 6 4
A 8
5 4
K Q 5
N
WE
S
8 5
10 7 6 2
K 8 7 3
A 6 3
K
K J 5 4 3
A Q 10 9 6 2
9

NS 3; NS 4; EW 2; NS 1N; NS 2; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S41706.930.073-Petersen-Tingey vs 2-Blanchard-High
3 S31404.642.361-Willoughby-Geary vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
3 S31404.642.364-Clark-Berry vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
3 S31404.642.3610-Deyager-Infausto vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel
3 S41302.364.642-Newel-Newel vs 11-Smith-McCoy
2 W41701.215.798-Kelley-Levy vs 1-Hempel-Noga
5 S−33000.076.939-Smith-James vs 3-Town-Wiedel

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
10 8 7 3
10 7
A 8 4 2
A 9 6
Q J 2
Q 6 2
Q 10 7 6 3
7 3
N
WE
S
K 5
K J 9 5 4 3
9
J 8 5 4
A 9 6 4
A 8
K J 5
K Q 10 2

NS 4; NS 2N; EW 2; NS 3; NS 2; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S44206.930.072-Newel-Newel vs 11-Smith-McCoy
3 NTS34005.791.2110-Deyager-Infausto vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel
2 S41704.642.363-Petersen-Tingey vs 2-Blanchard-High
4 S−1503.503.501-Willoughby-Geary vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
4 S−21001.795.214-Clark-Berry vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
3 NTN−21001.795.218-Kelley-Levy vs 1-Hempel-Noga
4 S−31500.076.939-Smith-James vs 3-Town-Wiedel

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
8 7 3 2
A Q 10 5 4
J 4
K 3
10 6 5
K J 9 3
K 9 8
A 8 7
N
WE
S
A 9 4
7 2
7 6 5
Q J 10 5 4
K Q J
8 6
A Q 10 3 2
9 6 2

NS 4; NS 3; NS 2N; NS 3; NS 1; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS36006.930.071-Willoughby-Geary vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
3 S31405.211.792-Newel-Newel vs 11-Smith-McCoy
2 N31405.211.793-Petersen-Tingey vs 2-Blanchard-High
2 N21102.364.648-Kelley-Levy vs 1-Hempel-Noga
2 N21102.364.649-Smith-James vs 3-Town-Wiedel
3 S31102.364.6410-Deyager-Infausto vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel
3 E−21000.076.934-Clark-Berry vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
10 7 6 3
Q 9 3 2
Q 8
A K 3
K Q 9 4 2
10 6 4
10 4
Q J 2
N
WE
S
A J 8
A K
A J 9 6 5
10 9 5
5
J 8 7 5
K 7 3 2
8 7 6 4

EW 3N; EW 3; EW 2; NS 1; EW 1; Par −600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−33006.930.072-Newel-Newel vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
4 W−22005.791.219-Smith-James vs 2-Blanchard-High
4 E−11004.642.3610-Deyager-Infausto vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
3 NTE36003.503.501-Willoughby-Geary vs 8-Miller-Daniels
4 E46201.795.213-Petersen-Tingey vs 1-Hempel-Noga
4 E46201.795.214-Clark-Berry vs 3-Town-Wiedel
3 NTE56600.076.935-Creede-Gearhart vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
Q 10 6
4
K 7 5 3 2
A J 5 3
J 9 8 7 3 2
9 2
A J
10 9 8
N
WE
S
K 5 4
J 10 8
10 9 4
K Q 6 2
A
A K Q 7 6 5 3
Q 8 6
7 4

NS 5; N 4N; S 3N; NS 4; NS 2; EW 1; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S64806.360.645-Creede-Gearhart vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel
4 S64806.360.6410-Deyager-Infausto vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
4 S44204.642.362-Newel-Newel vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 S62303.503.503-Petersen-Tingey vs 1-Hempel-Noga
3 S52001.795.214-Clark-Berry vs 3-Town-Wiedel
3 S52001.795.219-Smith-James vs 2-Blanchard-High
4 W−31500.076.931-Willoughby-Geary vs 8-Miller-Daniels

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
A 2
10 4
A K
K Q 10 8 7 5 4
Q J 4
K 9 3 2
Q J 7 2
6 2
N
WE
S
K 9 8 7 6 5 3
5
8 5 4 3
A
10
A Q J 8 7 6
10 9 6
J 9 3

NS 5; NS 5; EW 2; EW 2; Par +500: EW 5×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 N66806.930.079-Smith-James vs 2-Blanchard-High
4 S46205.791.211-Willoughby-Geary vs 8-Miller-Daniels
5 N56004.072.933-Petersen-Tingey vs 1-Hempel-Noga
5 N56004.072.935-Creede-Gearhart vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel
5 E−21002.364.6410-Deyager-Infausto vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
4 S−11001.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 NTN−44000.076.934-Clark-Berry vs 3-Town-Wiedel

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
A K Q J
9 4 3 2
Q 9
A 4 2
5
10 8 5
K J 8 7 4
10 9 7 5
N
WE
S
10 9 2
Q J 7
6 5 3
J 8 6 3
8 7 6 4 3
A K 6
A 10 2
K Q

NS 6; S 6; NS 5N; N 5; NS 3; NS 3; Par +980

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 S710106.930.073-Petersen-Tingey vs 11-Smith-McCoy
6 NTN69905.791.214-Clark-Berry vs 2-Blanchard-High
4 S75104.072.931-Willoughby-Geary vs 7-Myers-Myers
4 N75104.072.936-Kendall-Burns vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
3 NTS64902.364.645-Creede-Gearhart vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
3 NTN54601.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
5 N54500.076.9310-Deyager-Infausto vs 3-Town-Wiedel

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
J 8
9 3
A Q J 8
Q 10 9 6 3
9 6 4
A J 8 5
10 9 6
A 8 5
N
WE
S
5 3
K Q 6 2
K 5 4 3 2
K 4
A K Q 10 7 2
10 7 4
7
J 7 2

NS 2; EW 2; NS 3; NS 1N; EW 2; Par +100: EW 3×−1; EW 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S31405.791.213-Petersen-Tingey vs 11-Smith-McCoy
3 S31405.791.216-Kendall-Burns vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
3 S31405.791.2110-Deyager-Infausto vs 3-Town-Wiedel
2 S21102.934.071-Willoughby-Geary vs 7-Myers-Myers
2 S21102.934.074-Clark-Berry vs 2-Blanchard-High
3 W−1501.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
3 S−1500.076.935-Creede-Gearhart vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
J 10
J 2
8 7 4
Q 8 7 6 4 2
9 8 4
10 9 8 7 6 3
Q 3 2
3
N
WE
S
3
K Q 5
K J 10 9 6 5
K J 5
A K Q 7 6 5 2
A 4
A
A 10 9

NS 5; NS 4N; NS 5; EW 3; EW 1; Par +500: EW 6×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S56506.360.643-Petersen-Tingey vs 11-Smith-McCoy
4 S56506.360.6410-Deyager-Infausto vs 3-Town-Wiedel
4 S46203.503.502-Newel-Newel vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
4 S46203.503.505-Creede-Gearhart vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
4 S46203.503.506-Kendall-Burns vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
3 S41701.215.794-Clark-Berry vs 2-Blanchard-High
4 S−11000.076.931-Willoughby-Geary vs 7-Myers-Myers

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
K 9 3
J 10 9 6
J 8
A 5 3 2
7
A 8 5 4 2
A 7 6 2
K Q 4
N
WE
S
10 6 5 4
Q 7
K Q 9 4
9 8 7
A Q J 8 2
K 3
10 5 3
J 10 6

NS 2; EW 2; EW 2; NS 2; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W−33006.360.644-Clark-Berry vs 1-Hempel-Noga
3 W−33006.360.647-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 7-Myers-Myers
2 S21104.642.363-Petersen-Tingey vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
1 NTW−11002.934.071-Willoughby-Geary vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
2 NTE−11002.934.076-Kendall-Burns vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel
1 NTW1901.215.795-Creede-Gearhart vs 3-Town-Wiedel
2 S−21000.076.932-Newel-Newel vs 8-Miller-Daniels

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
A K Q 8 2
K 6
K 10 9 4
A 4
J 7
7 4 3 2
3
Q J 9 8 5 2
N
WE
S
10 9
A Q 8
A Q 8 7 6 2
10 7
6 5 4 3
J 10 9 5
J 5
K 6 3

NS 3N; N 2; N 2; S 1; NS 1; EW 1; Par +600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N56506.930.073-Petersen-Tingey vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
4 N46205.211.794-Clark-Berry vs 1-Hempel-Noga
4 N46205.211.796-Kendall-Burns vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel
1 N41703.503.501-Willoughby-Geary vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
4 N−11002.364.645-Creede-Gearhart vs 3-Town-Wiedel
4 N−22000.646.362-Newel-Newel vs 8-Miller-Daniels
4 N−22000.646.367-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 7-Myers-Myers

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
5 4
Q 10 8 6
10 8 7 6
K 10 8
A J 9 7 6
3 2
4 2
J 9 6 5
N
WE
S
Q 8 2
A 5 4
A 5 3
A Q 4 3
K 10 3
K J 9 7
K Q J 9
7 2

EW 4; EW 3N; EW 5; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 W21105.791.213-Petersen-Tingey vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 E31105.791.214-Clark-Berry vs 1-Hempel-Noga
2 E21105.791.216-Kendall-Burns vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel
3 E31402.934.075-Creede-Gearhart vs 3-Town-Wiedel
2 E31402.934.077-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 7-Myers-Myers
2 E41701.215.791-Willoughby-Geary vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
3 NTE54600.076.932-Newel-Newel vs 8-Miller-Daniels

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
J 9 5
9 6
J 8 4 2
K 8 6 3
A K Q 3
K 10 7 5 4 3 2
5 2
N
WE
S
10 8 7 2
A 8
K Q 10 3
J 10 9
6 4
Q J
A 9 7 6 5
A Q 7 4

EW 5; EW 5; EW 2N; NS 1; Par −650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W62306.500.504-Clark-Berry vs 11-Smith-McCoy
3 W62306.500.506-Kendall-Burns vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
3 W72605.002.002-Newel-Newel vs 7-Myers-Myers
4 W56504.003.003-Petersen-Tingey vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
4 E66801.505.501-Willoughby-Geary vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel
4 W66801.505.505-Creede-Gearhart vs 2-Blanchard-High
4 W66801.505.507-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
4 W66801.505.508-Kelley-Levy vs 8-Miller-Daniels

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
9 8 6
A 4
J 4 2
K 9 7 4 3
Q 5 3
J 9 8 2
Q 10 9 8 5 3
N
WE
S
K 10 4 2
Q 5 3
7 6
A J 10 6
A J 7
K 10 7 6
A K
Q 8 5 2

NS 4; NS 1N; NS 1; NS 1; NS 1; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS36007.000.003-Petersen-Tingey vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
3 NTS−11005.002.001-Willoughby-Geary vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel
1 NTS−11005.002.005-Creede-Gearhart vs 2-Blanchard-High
3 S−11005.002.008-Kelley-Levy vs 8-Miller-Daniels
3 NTS−33002.005.004-Clark-Berry vs 11-Smith-McCoy
3 NTS−33002.005.006-Kendall-Burns vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
3 NTS−33002.005.007-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
3 NTS−44000.007.002-Newel-Newel vs 7-Myers-Myers

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
10 5
9 8 5 3
A J 9
Q 8 5 2
8 3 2
K 4
K 6 5 4 2
A 9 4
N
WE
S
A Q J 9 7
A J 6
Q 10
K J 6
K 6 4
Q 10 7 2
8 7 3
10 7 3

EW 5N; EW 5; EW 5; EW 4; EW 2; Par −460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 NTE−21007.000.007-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
4 E44205.002.003-Petersen-Tingey vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
4 E44205.002.004-Clark-Berry vs 11-Smith-McCoy
4 E44205.002.008-Kelley-Levy vs 8-Miller-Daniels
3 NTE44303.004.006-Kendall-Burns vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
4 E54501.505.501-Willoughby-Geary vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel
4 E54501.505.505-Creede-Gearhart vs 2-Blanchard-High
3 NTE54600.007.002-Newel-Newel vs 7-Myers-Myers

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
K 7 3
6 3
10 8
A K 9 7 5 4
A 10 8 6 2
A K 10 9 2
Q 7
3
N
WE
S
5
Q 5 4
K 9 5 4 3
J 10 8 2
Q J 9 4
J 8 7
A J 6 2
Q 6

EW 3; EW 1N; EW 2; EW 1; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N31107.000.004-Clark-Berry vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 W−11006.001.006-Kendall-Burns vs 3-Town-Wiedel
3 N−1505.002.005-Creede-Gearhart vs 1-Hempel-Noga
2 W21104.003.007-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel
2 W31403.004.008-Kelley-Levy vs 7-Myers-Myers
2 W41701.505.502-Newel-Newel vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
2 W41701.505.503-Petersen-Tingey vs 8-Miller-Daniels
5 ×N−35000.007.009-Smith-James vs 9-Richardson-Boyd

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
7 3 2
8 5
A 10 9 7 5 4 2
Q
A 8 4
A J 10 9 7 3
6 3
A K
N
WE
S
9 5
Q 2
K Q J 8
J 10 8 4 3
K Q J 10 6
K 6 4
9 7 6 5 2

EW 4N; EW 3; EW 3; EW 1; EW 1; Par −630

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−11006.500.503-Petersen-Tingey vs 8-Miller-Daniels
3 W−11006.500.504-Clark-Berry vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 W31405.002.006-Kendall-Burns vs 3-Town-Wiedel
3 W41704.003.005-Creede-Gearhart vs 1-Hempel-Noga
4 S−33003.004.002-Newel-Newel vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
3 S−44002.005.008-Kelley-Levy vs 7-Myers-Myers
4 W46201.006.009-Smith-James vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
3 NTE46300.007.007-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
K 8 3
J 9 7 5 2
9 2
J 9 2
10 2
Q 10 4
A Q J 8 6 3
5 4
N
WE
S
A Q 9 6 5 4
K 3
K 7
A K Q
J 7
A 8 6
10 5 4
10 8 7 6 3

EW 6N; EW 6; EW 5; EW 3; EW 4; Par −990

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E44206.500.502-Newel-Newel vs 6-Strombotne-Graham
5 W64206.500.503-Petersen-Tingey vs 8-Miller-Daniels
4 E54505.002.004-Clark-Berry vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 NTE54603.503.507-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel
3 NTE54603.503.508-Kelley-Levy vs 7-Myers-Myers
3 NTE64901.505.506-Kendall-Burns vs 3-Town-Wiedel
3 NTW64901.505.509-Smith-James vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
6 NTE69900.007.005-Creede-Gearhart vs 1-Hempel-Noga

Board 28
West Deals
N-S Vul
A 10 7 5 4
A K Q J 2
K 6
J
Q J 2
6
A J 5 2
10 9 5 4 3
N
WE
S
K 8 3
9 5 3
10 9 4
A K Q 6
9 6
10 8 7 4
Q 8 7 3
8 7 2

NS 4; EW 4; NS 2; EW 1; Par +100: EW 5×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N52007.000.0010-Deyager-Infausto vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 N41705.501.506-Kendall-Burns vs 2-Blanchard-High
1 N41705.501.507-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
5 E−21004.003.003-Petersen-Tingey vs 7-Myers-Myers
1 N1802.504.504-Clark-Berry vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
1 N1802.504.505-Creede-Gearhart vs 11-Smith-McCoy
4 E−1501.006.009-Smith-James vs 8-Miller-Daniels
4 ×N−25000.007.008-Kelley-Levy vs 6-Strombotne-Graham

Board 29
North Deals
Both Vul
10 7 3 2
J 4 3
10 4
K 10 9 6
J 5
K Q 8 6 2
K J 8 5 3 2
N
WE
S
A K 9 8
9
A 9 6
A J 8 5 4
Q 6 4
A 10 7 5
Q 7
Q 7 3 2

EW 6; EW 4N; EW 4; E 4; W 3; EW 3; Par −1370

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−11007.000.0010-Deyager-Infausto vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 NTE36005.501.506-Kendall-Burns vs 2-Blanchard-High
3 N−66005.501.509-Smith-James vs 8-Miller-Daniels
3 NTE46303.004.003-Petersen-Tingey vs 7-Myers-Myers
3 NTE46303.004.005-Creede-Gearhart vs 11-Smith-McCoy
3 NTE46303.004.007-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
3 NTE66900.506.504-Clark-Berry vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
3 NTE66900.506.508-Kelley-Levy vs 6-Strombotne-Graham

Board 30
East Deals
None Vul
10 8 2
8 7 2
J 10 9 8 7 4 2
A K J 9 7
K 10
Q 6 5 2
6 5
N
WE
S
Q 6 5 4 3
A J
A J 8 7 3
Q
Q 9 6 5 4 3
K 10 9 4
A K 3

W 4; NS 4; E 3; EW 4; NS 4; Par −100: NS 5×−1; NS 5×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−1507.000.006-Kendall-Burns vs 2-Blanchard-High
4 E44205.501.509-Smith-James vs 8-Miller-Daniels
4 E44205.501.5010-Deyager-Infausto vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
4 E54502.005.003-Petersen-Tingey vs 7-Myers-Myers
4 E54502.005.004-Clark-Berry vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
4 W54502.005.005-Creede-Gearhart vs 11-Smith-McCoy
5 E54502.005.007-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 4-Coppersmith-Efthemon
4 E54502.005.008-Kelley-Levy vs 6-Strombotne-Graham

Board 31
South Deals
N-S Vul
9 6
A J 4 2
A Q 10 7 6
5 3
J 10 4
10 8 7
J 4 3 2
10 9 4
N
WE
S
Q 8 7 5 3
K Q 3
K 9 5
Q 6
A K 2
9 6 5
8
A K J 8 7 2

NS 6; NS 5N; NS 5; NS 4; NS 2; Par +1370

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS56606.930.076-Kendall-Burns vs 1-Hempel-Noga
3 NTS46305.791.215-Creede-Gearhart vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
2 NTS41804.642.364-Clark-Berry vs 8-Miller-Daniels
2 S61702.364.647-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 3-Town-Wiedel
3 S61702.364.649-Smith-James vs 7-Myers-Myers
3 S61702.364.6410-Deyager-Infausto vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
2 N31400.076.938-Kelley-Levy vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel

Board 32
West Deals
E-W Vul
A K Q 9 8
9 5 2
J
Q 6 5 2
5 3 2
A 10 4
A 5 4 2
A 10 8
N
WE
S
J 10 7 4
Q J 7 6 3
Q 7 6
K
6
K 8
K 10 9 8 3
J 9 7 4 3

EW 3; EW 2N; NS 2; EW 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E−22006.930.074-Clark-Berry vs 8-Miller-Daniels
2 N31405.791.2110-Deyager-Infausto vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
4 E−11004.072.938-Kelley-Levy vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel
3 E−11004.072.939-Smith-James vs 7-Myers-Myers
2 N−21002.364.647-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 3-Town-Wiedel
3 E31400.646.365-Creede-Gearhart vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 E31400.646.366-Kendall-Burns vs 1-Hempel-Noga

Board 33
North Deals
None Vul
J 10 8 7
J 10 9
J 9 6
J 8 5
A 9 6 2
8 5
Q 10 4
A K 10 6
N
WE
S
3
K 7 4 3 2
7 5 3
Q 7 4 2
K Q 5 4
A Q 6
A K 8 2
9 3

NS 2N; NS 2; EW 2; EW 1; Par +100: EW 3×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS41806.930.0710-Deyager-Infausto vs 9-Richardson-Boyd
1 NTS21205.791.217-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 3-Town-Wiedel
1 W−1503.503.505-Creede-Gearhart vs 10-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 W−1503.503.506-Kendall-Burns vs 1-Hempel-Noga
1 NTW−1503.503.508-Kelley-Levy vs 5-Heisdorf-Druffel
1 S−1501.215.794-Clark-Berry vs 8-Miller-Daniels
1 NTW21200.076.939-Smith-James vs 7-Myers-Myers