Maggie's 750 Special Tuesday Aft Session April 21, 2015
Scores after 12 rounds  Average:  132.0      Section  M  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
 10   61.43  162.17  B   1     1          1.04(A)  Deb Petersen - Barbara Wiedel
 13   60.95  160.92  B   2     2          0.73(A)  Cynthia Tingey - JoAnn Huebner
  1   60.12  158.71  C   3     3     1    0.52(A)  Karin Blanchard - Judy Pardun
  5   53.08  140.13  B   4     4          0.36(A)  Mary Ann Clark - Beverly Little
  8   52.69  139.09  C   5           2    0.21(A)  Sue Comporato - Marilyn J. Kendall
 12   51.03  134.73  B                             Denny Tweed - Cathleen Burden
  6   47.81  126.23  A                             Pat Huston - Gerry Jones
  3   46.75  123.43  A                             Janet Blumberg - Stephen Blumberg
  7   44.78  118.23  B                             Bill Burns - Andrew Graves
  2   44.24  116.79  C                             Jeremy Newel - Michael Newel
  4   43.33  114.39  C                             Nadine Nemechek - Donna Berman
  9   33.81   89.26  B                             Joan James - Elaine J. Smith
Maggie's 750 Special Tuesday Aft Session April 21, 2015
Scores after 12 rounds  Average:  132.0      Section  M  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  4   62.66  165.43  C   1     1     1    1.04(A)  Fran Beazley - Marge Samuelson
  9   54.68  144.35  B   2     2          0.73(A)  Edward Grootendorst - Therese Grootendorst
  6   54.27  143.28  B   3     3          0.52(A)  Renee Laquerriere - Judy Nibler
  1   53.38  140.91  B   4     4          0.36(A)  Mary Gullo - Cheryl Hiney
 10   53.31  140.73  B   5                0.21(A)  Lois High - Ann Sadler
 13   52.50  138.59  C               2    0.21(C)  Jerry F. Noga - John Hempel
  2   51.93  137.09  C                             Marge Field - Nancy Jones
 11   48.28  127.45  B                             Tay Cherry - Betty Marousek
  7   47.05  124.22  C                             Bill Ward - M. Steve Johnson
  3   45.05  118.92  A                             Judy Nicholson - Suzanne Graham
  8   44.23  116.77  B                             Patricia Biddy - Marlene Frazier
 12   42.98  113.46  C                             Ruth Reynolds - John Donaldson
  5   40.30  106.40  A                             Yvonne Jeffrey - Gay Berry

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
10 7 5
10 9 5
9 8
K Q J 3 2
A Q 8 3 2
K J 6 4 2
J 6 3
N
WE
S
9 6
A Q 7 3
A K 2
A 8 7 4
K J 4
8
Q 10 7 5 4
10 9 6 5

EW 7; EW 6; EW 4N; EW 3; EW 1; Par −1510

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−210010.950.056-Huston-Jones vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
6 E−1509.861.141-Blanchard-Pardun vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
2 W62308.772.2313-Tingey-Huebner vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 E44207.683.323-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
3 NTE44306.054.959-James-Smith vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
3 NTE44306.054.9512-Tweed-Burden vs 10-High-Sadler
3 NTE54604.416.594-Nemechek-Berman vs 7-Ward-Johnson
4 E64802.778.235-Clark-Little vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 W64802.778.238-Comporato-Kendall vs 2-Field-Jones
4 W75100.5910.417-Burns-Graves vs 13-Noga-Hempel
4 E75100.5910.4110-Petersen-Wiedel vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
Q 10 9 8 4 3
J 6 2
4
9 8 4
J 6
9 8
K J 10 9 5
A Q J 7
N
WE
S
A K 5
A Q 10 5
Q 8 7 3
K 10
7 2
K 7 4 3
A 6 2
6 5 3 2

EW 5N; EW 5; EW 3; EW 4; EW 1; Par −460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 E540010.410.593-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
5 E540010.410.5910-Petersen-Wiedel vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
5 E64208.772.234-Nemechek-Berman vs 7-Ward-Johnson
3 NTE54607.683.3213-Tingey-Huebner vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 NTE64903.327.681-Blanchard-Pardun vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
3 NTE64903.327.685-Clark-Little vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 NTE64903.327.686-Huston-Jones vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
3 NTE64903.327.687-Burns-Graves vs 13-Noga-Hempel
3 NTE64903.327.688-Comporato-Kendall vs 2-Field-Jones
3 NTE64903.327.689-James-Smith vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
3 NTE64903.327.6812-Tweed-Burden vs 10-High-Sadler

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
K 8 6 3
9 6
K Q 8 5 4
10 4
Q 2
Q 8 5
J 10 7
A K 8 7 3
N
WE
S
A 10 9 7 5 4
7 4
2
Q 9 6 2
J
A K J 10 3 2
A 9 6 3
J 5

EW 3; NS 3; NS 4; EW 4; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−220010.950.0510-Petersen-Wiedel vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
3 S41709.861.145-Clark-Little vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
3 S31407.683.321-Blanchard-Pardun vs 13-Noga-Hempel
3 S31407.683.328-Comporato-Kendall vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
3 S31407.683.3213-Tingey-Huebner vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
3 S41305.505.506-Huston-Jones vs 10-High-Sadler
4 S−1503.867.142-Newel-Newel vs 2-Field-Jones
2 S−1503.867.149-James-Smith vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
4 S−21002.238.7712-Tweed-Burden vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 W41301.149.864-Nemechek-Berman vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 NTW52100.0510.957-Burns-Graves vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
4 2
J 10 3 2
Q 2
A Q 10 7 5
7 5
Q 4
K 10 9 7 5 3
K J 2
N
WE
S
J 10 9 8 6 3
A K 9
J
9 6 3
A K Q
8 7 6 5
A 8 6 4
8 4

NS 3N; NS 3; S 4; N 3; NS 1; Par +600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 W−330010.950.0512-Tweed-Burden vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
2 N41709.861.1413-Tingey-Huebner vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
2 N21107.683.324-Nemechek-Berman vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 N21107.683.326-Huston-Jones vs 10-High-Sadler
2 N21107.683.327-Burns-Graves vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
2 E−11004.416.595-Clark-Little vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
2 E−11004.416.598-Comporato-Kendall vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
2 E−11004.416.5910-Petersen-Wiedel vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
2 W2902.238.779-James-Smith vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
2 E21101.149.861-Blanchard-Pardun vs 13-Noga-Hempel
3 S−22000.0510.952-Newel-Newel vs 2-Field-Jones

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
2
A K 7 6 3
Q 5
Q J 7 6 2
K Q 10 9 7 3
10 4
6 3
10 9 4
N
WE
S
8 6 5
9 8 5
A K 9 8 7
K 3
A J 4
Q J 2
J 10 4 2
A 8 5

NS 4; NS 3N; NS 4; NS 2; EW 1; Par +500: EW 4×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ×N479010.950.053-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
4 N56508.772.231-Blanchard-Pardun vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 N56508.772.235-Clark-Little vs 7-Ward-Johnson
4 N56508.772.2310-Petersen-Wiedel vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
3 NTS46306.594.4113-Tingey-Huebner vs 10-High-Sadler
4 N46204.416.592-Newel-Newel vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
4 N46204.416.596-Huston-Jones vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 N46204.416.597-Burns-Graves vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
3 N41702.238.778-Comporato-Kendall vs 13-Noga-Hempel
4 W−31500.5910.419-James-Smith vs 2-Field-Jones
4 W−31500.5910.4112-Tweed-Burden vs 8-Biddy-Frazier

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
3
6 4 3 2
A 5 4
J 9 7 6 2
J 7 2
A J 7
K 10 8 7
10 5 4
N
WE
S
A K 8 6
Q 10 8 5
Q J 2
A Q
Q 10 9 5 4
K 9
9 6 3
K 8 3

E 5N; EW 4; EW 5; EW 3; W 2N; EW 2; Par −660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E515010.950.057-Burns-Graves vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
3 NTE36008.232.771-Blanchard-Pardun vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 NTE36008.232.772-Newel-Newel vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
3 NTE36008.232.7712-Tweed-Burden vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
3 NTE36008.232.7713-Tingey-Huebner vs 10-High-Sadler
3 NTE46304.416.593-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
3 NTE46304.416.598-Comporato-Kendall vs 13-Noga-Hempel
3 NTE46304.416.599-James-Smith vs 2-Field-Jones
4 E56502.238.7710-Petersen-Wiedel vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
3 NTE56600.5910.415-Clark-Little vs 7-Ward-Johnson
3 NTE56600.5910.416-Huston-Jones vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
10 7 4 3 2
A 9
Q 10 6 3
10 9
A K 9
4 2
K 4
Q 8 7 4 3 2
N
WE
S
Q
J 8 6 5
9 8 7 2
K J 6 5
J 8 6 5
K Q 10 7 3
A J 5
A

NS 3; NS 3; NS 3; EW 3; NS 1N; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W−220010.950.0510-Petersen-Wiedel vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
2 N41708.772.232-Newel-Newel vs 13-Noga-Hempel
2 S41708.772.237-Burns-Graves vs 10-High-Sadler
2 N41708.772.2312-Tweed-Burden vs 7-Ward-Johnson
2 S31406.054.953-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 2-Field-Jones
3 S31406.054.956-Huston-Jones vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
3 W−11004.416.598-Comporato-Kendall vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
2 W2903.327.684-Nemechek-Berman vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
4 N−11001.689.321-Blanchard-Pardun vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
4 N−11001.689.329-James-Smith vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
1 NTN−22000.0510.9513-Tingey-Huebner vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
10 8 5
9 6 4
A J 7
K 8 7 6
K 7 6
7 2
9 8 5 3
9 5 3 2
N
WE
S
Q 3 2
Q J 10
K 10 4 2
J 10 4
A J 9 4
A K 8 5 3
Q 6
A Q

NS 4N; NS 4; NS 4; NS 3; NS 2; Par +430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S54509.861.148-Comporato-Kendall vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 S54509.861.1412-Tweed-Burden vs 7-Ward-Johnson
4 S54509.861.1413-Tingey-Huebner vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 S44205.505.501-Blanchard-Pardun vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
4 S44205.505.504-Nemechek-Berman vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
4 S44205.505.506-Huston-Jones vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
4 S44205.505.509-James-Smith vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
4 S44205.505.5010-Petersen-Wiedel vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
1 S31402.238.773-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 2-Field-Jones
4 S−1500.5910.412-Newel-Newel vs 13-Noga-Hempel
4 S−1500.5910.417-Burns-Graves vs 10-High-Sadler

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
A 9 8 6 4 2
9 3
9 5 2
K J
K 10 7 3
K
A 7 6
9 5 4 3 2
N
WE
S
J
Q 7 6 4 2
Q J 10 8 4
Q 10
Q 5
A J 10 8 5
K 3
A 8 7 6

S 2N; NS 2; NS 2; N 1N; EW 1; N 1; Par +120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N417010.950.059-James-Smith vs 13-Noga-Hempel
2 N31409.861.1413-Tingey-Huebner vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
2 N21108.772.238-Comporato-Kendall vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
1 W−11007.683.322-Newel-Newel vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
1 NTS1906.594.411-Blanchard-Pardun vs 10-High-Sadler
4 N−1503.327.683-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
2 NTS−1503.327.685-Clark-Little vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
2 N−1503.327.687-Burns-Graves vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
2 S−1503.327.6810-Petersen-Wiedel vs 2-Field-Jones
2 N−1503.327.6812-Tweed-Burden vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 N−21000.0510.954-Nemechek-Berman vs 3-Nicholson-Graham

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
3 2
7 2
K J 9 7
A Q 9 8 7
A 8 6 5
A Q 9 6
8 6 2
3 2
N
WE
S
J 7
K J 10 8 3
10 3
J 10 6 5
K Q 10 9 4
5 4
A Q 5 4
K 4

NS 4; NS 4; EW 2; NS 3; NS 1N; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 W−330010.950.052-Newel-Newel vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 N61709.861.141-Blanchard-Pardun vs 10-High-Sadler
3 S51508.772.235-Clark-Little vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
2 S41305.505.504-Nemechek-Berman vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
2 N41305.505.507-Burns-Graves vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 S41305.505.508-Comporato-Kendall vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
3 S41305.505.5012-Tweed-Burden vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 S41305.505.5013-Tingey-Huebner vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
1 NTN21202.238.773-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
3 S31101.149.8610-Petersen-Wiedel vs 2-Field-Jones
3 NTN−22000.0510.959-James-Smith vs 13-Noga-Hempel

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
Q 4 2
A 9
A K Q 3
K Q 10 6
A 7 6 5
Q 4
J 10 6
A J 7 4
N
WE
S
8
K J 8 7 6
9 4 2
9 8 5 3
K J 10 9 3
10 5 3 2
8 7 5
2

NS 4; NS 3N; NS 3; NS 1; NS 1; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N545010.950.051-Blanchard-Pardun vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 NTN44309.861.144-Nemechek-Berman vs 2-Field-Jones
4 N44208.772.238-Comporato-Kendall vs 10-High-Sadler
3 NTN34006.594.413-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 13-Noga-Hempel
3 NTN34006.594.416-Huston-Jones vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 NTN34006.594.4112-Tweed-Burden vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
3 N41703.327.682-Newel-Newel vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
3 N41703.327.689-James-Smith vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
2 S41703.327.6810-Petersen-Wiedel vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
4 S−1501.149.8613-Tingey-Huebner vs 7-Ward-Johnson
4 S−21000.0510.955-Clark-Little vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
K 5 4
8 3
Q 7 5
A 8 7 6 3
J 10 8 7
K 9 2
A K 10 6 4
10
N
WE
S
A 9
Q 10 5
J 9 8 3 2
K 5 2
Q 6 3 2
A J 7 6 4
Q J 9 4

EW 3; NS 3; NS 1; NS 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ×W−230010.950.059-James-Smith vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 NTE−31509.861.141-Blanchard-Pardun vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 W−1507.683.322-Newel-Newel vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
3 E−1507.683.324-Nemechek-Berman vs 2-Field-Jones
1 NTE−1507.683.3210-Petersen-Wiedel vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
2 W2905.505.505-Clark-Little vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
2 NTN−11004.416.593-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 13-Noga-Hempel
2 E31102.238.776-Huston-Jones vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 E31102.238.7712-Tweed-Burden vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
3 W31102.238.7713-Tingey-Huebner vs 7-Ward-Johnson
3 E41300.0510.958-Comporato-Kendall vs 10-High-Sadler

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
3 2
Q 9
Q J 8 3 2
10 6 3 2
K 7 6
K J 4 3 2
10 9 5
7 4
N
WE
S
A 8 5
10 8 7 5
7 6
K Q 9 5
Q J 10 9 4
A 6
A K 4
A J 8

NS 2; EW 2; NS 3; NS 1N; NS 2; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 S52009.321.683-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 S52009.321.685-Clark-Little vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
1 S52009.321.686-Huston-Jones vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
1 S52009.321.6813-Tingey-Huebner vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
1 S41706.594.411-Blanchard-Pardun vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
1 S31404.956.057-Burns-Graves vs 7-Ward-Johnson
1 S31404.956.0510-Petersen-Wiedel vs 13-Noga-Hempel
1 NTS21202.778.232-Newel-Newel vs 10-High-Sadler
2 NTS21202.778.2312-Tweed-Burden vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
1 S1801.149.869-James-Smith vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
2 E21100.0510.954-Nemechek-Berman vs 1-Gullo-Hiney

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
K 5 4
10 7 2
J 8 3
J 9 8 6
A Q 8 7
J 6
6 5 2
10 7 5 2
N
WE
S
J 6
K Q 8
K Q 9 7 4
A K 3
10 9 3 2
A 9 5 4 3
A 10
Q 4

EW 2N; EW 2; EW 3; EW 2; EW 1; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S211010.950.051-Blanchard-Pardun vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
3 NTE−21008.772.235-Clark-Little vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
3 NTE−21008.772.236-Huston-Jones vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
3 NTE−21008.772.2310-Petersen-Wiedel vs 13-Noga-Hempel
2 W−1505.505.503-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 E−1505.505.5012-Tweed-Burden vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
2 NTE−1505.505.5013-Tingey-Huebner vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 E2903.327.682-Newel-Newel vs 10-High-Sadler
3 E31102.238.777-Burns-Graves vs 7-Ward-Johnson
1 NTE31501.149.869-James-Smith vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
3 NTE34000.0510.954-Nemechek-Berman vs 1-Gullo-Hiney

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
9 7 4 3
A K 9 8 6
6 5
Q J
K 6
Q 5 3
K J 4
A 6 4 3 2
N
WE
S
2
J 7 4 2
Q 9 7 3
K 8 7 5
A Q J 10 8 5
10
A 10 8 2
10 9

NS 3; EW 2; EW 2; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S462010.950.055-Clark-Little vs 2-Field-Jones
3 S41709.861.1410-Petersen-Wiedel vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 S31408.232.771-Blanchard-Pardun vs 7-Ward-Johnson
1 S31408.232.773-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
4 S−11003.327.682-Newel-Newel vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 S−11003.327.684-Nemechek-Berman vs 13-Noga-Hempel
4 S−11003.327.686-Huston-Jones vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
4 S−11003.327.687-Burns-Graves vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
4 S−11003.327.688-Comporato-Kendall vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
4 S−11003.327.6812-Tweed-Burden vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
4 S−11003.327.6813-Tingey-Huebner vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
Q J 10 8 6 4 3
A Q
A K
K 9
A K 9 5 2
9 8
J 7 5 3
A 10
N
WE
S
K 7 6 5 3
Q 8 6 4
Q J 3 2
7
J 10 4 2
10 9 2
8 7 6 5 4

EW 1N; EW 2; NS 1; EW 1; NS 1; Par −90

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTW−440010.950.0513-Tingey-Huebner vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
1 NTE−33009.861.1412-Tweed-Burden vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
3 N31408.772.238-Comporato-Kendall vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
2 N21107.143.864-Nemechek-Berman vs 13-Noga-Hempel
2 N21107.143.865-Clark-Little vs 2-Field-Jones
4 N−21004.956.051-Blanchard-Pardun vs 7-Ward-Johnson
4 N−21004.956.053-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
2 W31103.327.6810-Petersen-Wiedel vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
2 NTW21202.238.776-Huston-Jones vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
2 S−31500.5910.412-Newel-Newel vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 NTN−31500.5910.417-Burns-Graves vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
K J 5
7 6 3
A 8
A J 9 8 3
A Q 10 9 8 4 2
A J 10 5
9
5
N
WE
S
6 3
K Q 4
K 10 4
Q 10 7 6 2
7
9 8 2
Q J 7 6 5 3 2
K 4

EW 3; E 3; W 2; NS 1N; NS 2; EW 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S413010.950.058-Comporato-Kendall vs 7-Ward-Johnson
2 W21109.861.141-Blanchard-Pardun vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 W31408.232.775-Clark-Little vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
3 W31408.232.7713-Tingey-Huebner vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
1 W41706.054.952-Newel-Newel vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
2 W41706.054.957-Burns-Graves vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
4 W44203.327.684-Nemechek-Berman vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 W44203.327.689-James-Smith vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 W44203.327.6812-Tweed-Burden vs 2-Field-Jones
4 ×W45900.5910.413-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 10-High-Sadler
4 ×W45900.5910.416-Huston-Jones vs 3-Nicholson-Graham

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
A 9 5
10 7 4 2
8 5 3
J 8 7
K J 4
K 5 3
K Q 10 9 4
9 2
N
WE
S
7 2
Q J 9 6
A 6
A K Q 6 5
Q 10 8 6 3
A 8
J 7 2
10 4 3

EW 5N; EW 5; EW 5; EW 5; EW 2; Par −460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 W617010.950.0512-Tweed-Burden vs 2-Field-Jones
3 NTE34009.861.145-Clark-Little vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
4 E44208.772.238-Comporato-Kendall vs 7-Ward-Johnson
3 NTW44307.683.326-Huston-Jones vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
3 NTE54604.416.591-Blanchard-Pardun vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 NTW54604.416.593-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 10-High-Sadler
3 NTW54604.416.597-Burns-Graves vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
3 NTW54604.416.599-James-Smith vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 NTE54604.416.5913-Tingey-Huebner vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
3 NTW64900.5910.412-Newel-Newel vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
3 NTW64900.5910.414-Nemechek-Berman vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
Q J 2
K J 3 2
Q 10 8 6
10 3
K 10 6 3
A 9
J 9 5 3
8 6 4
N
WE
S
A 8 7
10 7 5
K 7
A K J 9 2
9 5 4
Q 8 6 4
A 4 2
Q 7 5

EW 2; EW 3; EW 1N; NS 1; EW 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTE−110010.500.508-Comporato-Kendall vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 E−110010.500.5013-Tingey-Huebner vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
2 S−1509.002.0012-Tweed-Burden vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
1 NTW1907.503.502-Newel-Newel vs 7-Ward-Johnson
2 E2907.503.507-Burns-Graves vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
1 W21104.506.501-Blanchard-Pardun vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
2 E31104.506.504-Nemechek-Berman vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
1 W21104.506.506-Huston-Jones vs 2-Field-Jones
2 E31104.506.5010-Petersen-Wiedel vs 10-High-Sadler
2 NTE21201.0010.003-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
2 NTW21201.0010.005-Clark-Little vs 13-Noga-Hempel
1 NTE21201.0010.009-James-Smith vs 8-Biddy-Frazier

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
A Q 6
J 7 3
9 6 4
K Q J 6
J 10 8 7 5 2
8 6
Q J 3
7 2
N
WE
S
K 3
A Q 10 9
A K 7 5
A 9 3
9 4
K 5 4 2
10 8 2
10 8 5 4

EW 4; EW 3; EW 2N; EW 3; EW 1; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−220010.500.505-Clark-Little vs 13-Noga-Hempel
3 NTE−220010.500.5010-Petersen-Wiedel vs 10-High-Sadler
4 E−11008.502.503-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
2 NTE−11008.502.504-Nemechek-Berman vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
2 NTE21206.504.508-Comporato-Kendall vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 NTE21206.504.509-James-Smith vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
2 E41305.006.007-Burns-Graves vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
3 E31404.007.006-Huston-Jones vs 2-Field-Jones
2 S−44003.008.002-Newel-Newel vs 7-Ward-Johnson
3 NTE36002.009.0012-Tweed-Burden vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
4 W46200.5010.501-Blanchard-Pardun vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
4 W46200.5010.5013-Tingey-Huebner vs 3-Nicholson-Graham

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
A K Q 10 9 7
J
Q J 7 2
A 3
J 2
A 10 8 7 4
9 4
K 10 8 5
N
WE
S
5 3
K Q 6 5 3
8 5 3
9 7 2
8 6 4
9 2
A K 10 6
Q J 6 4

NS 6; NS 6; NS 2N; NS 2; Par +1430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N66806.054.951-Blanchard-Pardun vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
4 N66806.054.952-Newel-Newel vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
5 N66806.054.953-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
4 N66806.054.954-Nemechek-Berman vs 10-High-Sadler
4 N66806.054.955-Clark-Little vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 N66806.054.956-Huston-Jones vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
4 N66806.054.957-Burns-Graves vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
4 N66806.054.958-Comporato-Kendall vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
4 N66806.054.9510-Petersen-Wiedel vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 N66806.054.9513-Tingey-Huebner vs 2-Field-Jones
3 N62300.0510.959-James-Smith vs 7-Ward-Johnson

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
A Q J 10 8 5
6
K 6
8 6 5 2
9 7
4 3
10 8 4 2
A K J 7 3
N
WE
S
K 6 2
10 9 5 2
J 7 5
Q 10 9
4 3
A K Q J 8 7
A Q 9 3
4

NS 5; NS 5; NS 2N; NS 3; S 1; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S648010.950.0510-Petersen-Wiedel vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 S54507.143.862-Newel-Newel vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
4 S54507.143.865-Clark-Little vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 S54507.143.866-Huston-Jones vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
4 S54507.143.867-Burns-Graves vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
4 S54507.143.868-Comporato-Kendall vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
4 S54507.143.8613-Tingey-Huebner vs 2-Field-Jones
4 S44202.238.771-Blanchard-Pardun vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
4 S44202.238.773-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
4 S44202.238.779-James-Smith vs 7-Ward-Johnson
3 S41700.0510.954-Nemechek-Berman vs 10-High-Sadler

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
A Q J 10 6 4
A J
5 3
J 4 3
9 2
8 7 4
K 9 8 7 6
A 9 7
N
WE
S
7
K Q 9 5 2
A Q J 10 2
Q 2
K 8 5 3
10 6 3
4
K 10 8 6 5

NS 4; EW 3; EW 4; NS 3; NS 1N; Par +200: EW 5×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N565010.950.057-Burns-Graves vs 2-Field-Jones
4 N46209.321.682-Newel-Newel vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
4 N46209.321.683-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 7-Ward-Johnson
5 W−22006.054.951-Blanchard-Pardun vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
5 ×E−12006.054.959-James-Smith vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 N52006.054.9510-Petersen-Wiedel vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
5 ×E−12006.054.9512-Tweed-Burden vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 W−11003.327.684-Nemechek-Berman vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 E41301.689.325-Clark-Little vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
4 E41301.689.326-Huston-Jones vs 13-Noga-Hempel
4 E51500.0510.958-Comporato-Kendall vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
J 6
9 2
K 9 8 7 4 3
10 7 5
Q 7 4
J 10
A J 10 2
Q J 3 2
N
WE
S
A K 2
A K Q 8 7
Q 6 5
K 9
10 9 8 5 3
6 5 4 3
A 8 6 4

EW 6N; E 6; E 6; W 5; EW 4; W 5; EW 4; Par −990

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 NTE−210010.950.051-Blanchard-Pardun vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
6 NTE−1509.321.682-Newel-Newel vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
6 NTW−1509.321.686-Huston-Jones vs 13-Noga-Hempel
3 NTW34007.683.3210-Petersen-Wiedel vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
3 NTE44306.054.957-Burns-Graves vs 2-Field-Jones
3 NTW44306.054.958-Comporato-Kendall vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
4 E54504.416.594-Nemechek-Berman vs 9-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 NTE54603.327.685-Clark-Little vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
3 NTW64902.238.7712-Tweed-Burden vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
6 NTW69901.149.863-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 7-Ward-Johnson
6 NT×E612300.0510.959-James-Smith vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
A 6 5
A 6
8 7 4 3
10 9 7 6
K J 8 7 2
K Q J 10 7
Q 6
3
N
WE
S
9 4
8 3
J 10 9
A K Q 8 5 4
Q 10 3
9 5 4 2
A K 5 2
J 2

EW 2N; EW 2; EW 2; EW 2; NS 1; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−22009.321.684-Nemechek-Berman vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
3 E−22009.321.689-James-Smith vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
3 W−22009.321.6810-Petersen-Wiedel vs 7-Ward-Johnson
4 W−22009.321.6813-Tingey-Huebner vs 13-Noga-Hempel
3 E−11003.867.143-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler
4 W−11003.867.145-Clark-Little vs 10-High-Sadler
4 W−11003.867.146-Huston-Jones vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 NTW−11003.867.147-Burns-Graves vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
4 W−11003.867.148-Comporato-Kendall vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
3 E−11003.867.1412-Tweed-Burden vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
3 E31100.0510.952-Newel-Newel vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
8 4
10 7 5 3 2
K 9 6 2
7 4
A K
Q
10 7 5 4
Q J 10 9 6 2
N
WE
S
J 9 7 6 5 3 2
J 6
A Q 8
3
Q 10
A K 9 8 4
J 3
A K 8 5

EW 3; NS 2; E 2; EW 2; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S314010.950.0510-Petersen-Wiedel vs 7-Ward-Johnson
4 E−11009.861.144-Nemechek-Berman vs 8-Biddy-Frazier
4 S−11008.232.7712-Tweed-Burden vs 11-Cherry-Marousek
4 S−11008.232.7713-Tingey-Huebner vs 13-Noga-Hempel
3 E31404.956.055-Clark-Little vs 10-High-Sadler
3 E31404.956.056-Huston-Jones vs 12-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 E31404.956.057-Burns-Graves vs 1-Gullo-Hiney
3 E31404.956.058-Comporato-Kendall vs 3-Nicholson-Graham
3 E52002.238.772-Newel-Newel vs 4-Beazley-Samuelson
4 S−33001.149.869-James-Smith vs 5-Jeffrey-Berry
4 E46200.0510.953-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 6-Laquerriere-Nibler