Maggie's 750 Pairs Tuesday Aft Session April 28, 2015
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  M  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  7   58.85   98.87  C   1     1     1    0.88(A)  Joan Deyager - Marsha Infausto
  5   53.85   90.46  B   2     2          0.62(A)  Cynthia Tingey - JoAnn Huebner
  8   53.13   89.25  C   3     3     2    0.44(A)  Sue Comporato - Marilyn J. Kendall
  3   52.63   88.42  A   4                0.31(A)  Pearl McGinnis - Barbara Brock
  1   52.14   87.59  C                             Karin Blanchard - Judy Pardun
 11   51.15   85.93  B                             Judy Geary - Carol Willoughby
  2   50.92   85.54  C                             Jeremy Newel - Michael Newel
  9   49.53   83.21  B                             Joan James - Elaine J. Smith
 10   44.05   74.00  A                             Angelina Heisdorf - Annie Chiljian
  4   42.75   71.82  C                             Nadine Nemechek - Donna Berman
  6   41.77   70.18  A                             Janet Blumberg - Stephen Blumberg
Maggie's 750 Pairs Tuesday Aft Session April 28, 2015
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  M  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  5   56.29   94.57  B   1     1          0.88(A)  Deb Petersen - Barbara Wiedel
 11   53.67   90.16  A   2                0.62(A)  Ron Vieira - Barry Druffel
  9   53.48   89.85  B   3     2          0.44(A)  Renee Laquerriere - Judy Nibler
  8   52.51   88.22  C   4     3     1    0.31(A)  Lois High - Ann Sadler
 10   51.74   86.93  B                             Denny Tweed - Cathleen Burden
  7   49.44   83.06  C               2    0.17(C)  Edward Grootendorst - Therese Grootendorst
  2   48.17   80.93  C                             Fran Beazley - Marge Samuelson
  3   47.07   79.07  A                             Suzanne Graham - Paul Boyd
  4   44.98   75.57  C                             Ruth Reynolds - John Donaldson
  6   42.64   71.64  A                             Dick Powell - Carol Miller

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
♠K 9 5 4 3
♥J 10 6 5
♦K 8
♣Q 10
♠Q
♥A K 7
♦J 4 2
♣J 8 7 6 3 2
N
WE
S
♠A J 8 7 2
♥4 3
♦A 10 5
♣K 5 4
♠10 6
♥Q 9 8 2
♦Q 9 7 6 3
♣A 9

EW 4♣; EW 2N; EW 1♠; NS 1♥; EW 1♦; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♣W−21006.930.077-Deyager-Infausto vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
2 NTW−1505.791.2110-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 8-High-Sadler
2 ♠E21104.642.369-James-Smith vs 6-Powell-Miller
3 ♣W41303.503.508-Comporato-Kendall vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 ♣W51502.364.645-Tingey-Huebner vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 NTW41801.215.796-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
3 NTW34000.076.9311-Geary-Willoughby vs 10-Tweed-Burden

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠A Q 10 8 5
♥A 7
♦A Q 10
♣K 7 2
♠9 6
♥9 8 6 5 4
♦6 4 3
♣9 5 3
N
WE
S
♠K 3
♥Q J 10 3 2
♦9 8 7
♣A 10 4
♠J 7 4 2
♥K
♦K J 5 2
♣Q J 8 6

NS 5♠; NS 4N; NS 5♦; NS 5♣; NS 2♥; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N56504.072.935-Tingey-Huebner vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
4 ♠N56504.072.936-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
4 ♠N56504.072.937-Deyager-Infausto vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 ♠N56504.072.938-Comporato-Kendall vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 ♠N56504.072.939-James-Smith vs 6-Powell-Miller
4 ♠N56504.072.9311-Geary-Willoughby vs 10-Tweed-Burden
6 ♠×N−12000.076.9310-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 8-High-Sadler

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠J 4 2
♥K 6 4
♦J 9 6
♣K Q J 10
♠A 9
♥10 8 3
♦K Q 7 5 2
♣8 5 4
N
WE
S
♠7 6 5
♥A J 9 7 5 2
♦4
♣A 9 6
♠K Q 10 8 3
♥Q
♦A 10 8 3
♣7 3 2

NS 2♠; EW 2♥; EW 1N; NS 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠S31406.930.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 10-Tweed-Burden
2 ♠S21105.211.797-Deyager-Infausto vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
2 ♠S21105.211.799-James-Smith vs 6-Powell-Miller
3 ♠S−21002.934.075-Tingey-Huebner vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 ♣N−21002.934.078-Comporato-Kendall vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
2 ♥E31401.215.7910-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 8-High-Sadler
4 ♥E46200.076.936-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 11-Vieira-Druffel

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
♠A J 9 7
♥A 6 5
♦A Q 8 2
♣8 4
♠K 10 5 2
♥J 8 2
♦10 4
♣A K Q 3
N
WE
S
♠8 4 3
♥9
♦K J 9 7 5
♣J 7 5 2
♠Q 6
♥K Q 10 7 4 3
♦6 3
♣10 9 6

NS 4♥; NS 3N; W 2♣; NS 1♠; W 1♦; E 1♣; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥S46206.360.646-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 10-Tweed-Burden
4 ♥N46206.360.648-Comporato-Kendall vs 3-Graham-Boyd
2 ♥N41704.642.361-Blanchard-Pardun vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
2 ♥S31402.934.0710-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
1 ♥S31402.934.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 ♥S−11000.646.362-Newel-Newel vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 ♥S−11000.646.369-James-Smith vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠A 5 4
♥K 9 4
♦A 9 3 2
♣K 10 4
♠K Q 8
♥A 10 8 7 6 3 2
♦J 10 4
♣—
N
WE
S
♠J 9
♥—
♦K Q 7 6
♣Q 9 7 6 5 3 2
♠10 7 6 3 2
♥Q J 5
♦8 5
♣A J 8

EW 2♥; NS 1N; S 1♠; EW 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥W−21006.360.641-Blanchard-Pardun vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
3 ♥W−21006.360.6410-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 ♥W−1504.642.368-Comporato-Kendall vs 3-Graham-Boyd
2 NTN−11003.503.502-Newel-Newel vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
3 ♠S−22001.215.796-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 10-Tweed-Burden
3 ♠S−22001.215.799-James-Smith vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 ♠S−22001.215.7911-Geary-Willoughby vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠J 4
♥A Q 7
♦A 6 3 2
♣Q 10 8 5
♠K 9 8 6 5 2
♥K 10 6
♦K J 5 4
♣—
N
WE
S
♠A Q
♥J 4 3 2
♦Q 8
♣K 9 7 6 3
♠10 7 3
♥9 8 5
♦10 9 7
♣A J 4 2

EW 3♠; W 2♥; EW 1N; E 1♥; EW 1♦; NS 1♣; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−22006.930.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 NTE−11005.791.218-Comporato-Kendall vs 3-Graham-Boyd
1 NTE1904.642.3610-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 NTS−31503.503.509-James-Smith vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
2 ♠W41701.215.791-Blanchard-Pardun vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
2 ♠W41701.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
2 ♠W41701.215.796-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 10-Tweed-Burden

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
♠A J 10 7 6 2
♥3
♦J 8 3 2
♣10 6
♠9 8
♥Q J 10 7
♦K Q 5 4
♣Q 5 4
N
WE
S
♠Q 5 3
♥4
♦A 10 7 6
♣K J 9 7 3
♠K 4
♥A K 9 8 6 5 2
♦9
♣A 8 2

EW 2N; NS 2♠; NS 2♥; EW 2♦; EW 2♣; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♥S31406.360.643-McGinnis-Brock vs 3-Graham-Boyd
3 ♥S31406.360.649-James-Smith vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 ♥S−11002.934.071-Blanchard-Pardun vs 10-Tweed-Burden
4 ♥S−11002.934.077-Deyager-Infausto vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
3 ♥S−11002.934.078-Comporato-Kendall vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
3 ♥S−11002.934.0710-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 6-Powell-Miller
4 ♥S−22000.076.9311-Geary-Willoughby vs 8-High-Sadler

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
♠10
♥K 8 5
♦K 10 9 6 5
♣8 7 4 3
♠A 6 4 3
♥A Q 7 2
♦Q J 4 3
♣Q
N
WE
S
♠K J 9 8 5 2
♥10 9 3
♦8
♣A K 6
♠Q 7
♥J 6 4
♦A 7 2
♣J 10 9 5 2

EW 5♠; EW 4N; EW 4♥; EW 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠E44206.930.079-James-Smith vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 ♠E54502.934.071-Blanchard-Pardun vs 10-Tweed-Burden
4 ♠E54502.934.073-McGinnis-Brock vs 3-Graham-Boyd
4 ♠E54502.934.077-Deyager-Infausto vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
4 ♠E54502.934.078-Comporato-Kendall vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 ♠E54502.934.0710-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 6-Powell-Miller
4 ♠E54502.934.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 8-High-Sadler

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠K 6 2
♥8
♦J 7 6 3 2
♣Q 8 6 4
♠J 10
♥A J 7 5
♦A Q 8 5
♣10 9 5
N
WE
S
♠8 5 4
♥K 10 9
♦10 9 4
♣A K 3 2
♠A Q 9 7 3
♥Q 6 4 3 2
♦K
♣J 7

EW 2N; EW 2♥; EW 2♣; NS 1♠; EW 1♦; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠S41706.930.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 8-High-Sadler
3 ♠S31405.791.219-James-Smith vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 ♠S−21004.072.931-Blanchard-Pardun vs 10-Tweed-Burden
3 ♠S−21004.072.937-Deyager-Infausto vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
3 ♣E31102.364.6410-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 6-Powell-Miller
3 ♠S−31500.646.363-McGinnis-Brock vs 3-Graham-Boyd
4 ♠S−31500.646.368-Comporato-Kendall vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
♠A 9 8 7 4
♥A Q J 2
♦A 9
♣K 7
♠Q 10 5 3
♥8 7
♦Q 7 2
♣9 6 5 2
N
WE
S
♠K 6
♥10 5
♦K 8 4
♣A Q 10 8 4 3
♠J 2
♥K 9 6 4 3
♦J 10 6 5 3
♣J

NS 4♥; NS 2♠; NS 3♦; W 3♣; NS 1N; E 2♣; Par +500: W 5♣×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥S46205.791.211-Blanchard-Pardun vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
4 ♥S46205.791.212-Newel-Newel vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
4 ♥S46205.791.2111-Geary-Willoughby vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 ♥S41702.934.073-McGinnis-Brock vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
2 ♥S41702.934.0710-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 ♥N31401.215.794-Nemechek-Berman vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
2 ♦S2900.076.939-James-Smith vs 3-Graham-Boyd

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
♠A 4 2
♥9 7
♦9 8 5 2
♣J 9 7 3
♠K 8 6
♥A 10 3
♦A K 7 6
♣A Q 5
N
WE
S
♠J 10 7
♥K 8 6 2
♦Q 10 4 3
♣10 4
♠Q 9 5 3
♥Q J 5 4
♦J
♣K 8 6 2

EW 4N; EW 4♥; E 5♦; E 3♠; W 4♦; W 2♠; EW 2♣; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−1506.360.643-McGinnis-Brock vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
3 NTW−1506.360.649-James-Smith vs 3-Graham-Boyd
2 ♣W2904.642.364-Nemechek-Berman vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 NTW34002.934.071-Blanchard-Pardun vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 NTW34002.934.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 NTW44301.215.7910-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 NTW54600.076.932-Newel-Newel vs 11-Vieira-Druffel

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
♠A K 10 8
♥A K 8 5 2
♦K 8 6
♣10
♠4
♥Q 7 6 4
♦10 5 4
♣A Q 8 7 4
N
WE
S
♠Q J 7 6 5 3
♥J 10
♦7
♣K 9 5 2
♠9 2
♥9 3
♦A Q J 9 3 2
♣J 6 3

NS 5♦; NS 3♥; NS 2N; EW 2♣; NS 1♠; Par +600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTN52106.930.079-James-Smith vs 3-Graham-Boyd
3 ♦S51505.791.213-McGinnis-Brock vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 ♦S41304.072.931-Blanchard-Pardun vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 ♦S41304.072.9311-Geary-Willoughby vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 ♦S−11001.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
5 ♦S−11001.215.794-Nemechek-Berman vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
5 ♦S−11001.215.7910-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
♠9 7 6 3
♥6 5
♦A Q 10 3 2
♣8 7
♠10 4
♥K 10 9 8
♦K 4
♣A 10 9 6 5
N
WE
S
♠K Q J 8 2
♥A J 7 4
♦7
♣Q 4 3
♠A 5
♥Q 3 2
♦J 9 8 6 5
♣K J 2

EW 4♥; EW 3♠; EW 4♣; NS 3♦; Par −500: NS 5♦×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−11006.930.071-Blanchard-Pardun vs 8-High-Sadler
3 ♦N−11005.791.212-Newel-Newel vs 10-Tweed-Burden
3 ♥E31404.072.935-Tingey-Huebner vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 ♥E31404.072.9311-Geary-Willoughby vs 6-Powell-Miller
4 ♥E46201.215.794-Nemechek-Berman vs 3-Graham-Boyd
4 ♥W46201.215.799-James-Smith vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 ♥E46201.215.7910-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
♠J 10 8 5
♥Q 10 6 2
♦7 5
♣10 5 4
♠—
♥9 7 5
♦K J 9 3
♣Q J 9 8 6 2
N
WE
S
♠9
♥A K J 3
♦A Q 6 4 2
♣K 7 3
♠A K Q 7 6 4 3 2
♥8 4
♦10 8
♣A

EW 6♦; EW 6♣; EW 5♥; NS 3♠; Par −500: NS 6♠×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠S−1505.791.215-Tingey-Huebner vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
4 ♠S−1505.791.219-James-Smith vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 ♠S−1505.791.2111-Geary-Willoughby vs 6-Powell-Miller
5 ♠S−21003.503.501-Blanchard-Pardun vs 8-High-Sadler
5 ♠×S−23001.795.214-Nemechek-Berman vs 3-Graham-Boyd
5 ♠×S−23001.795.2110-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
6 ♦×E610900.076.932-Newel-Newel vs 10-Tweed-Burden

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
♠8 6
♥K J
♦K Q 8 6 3
♣A Q 6 5
♠K 3
♥A 8 4 2
♦J 9 2
♣K 8 7 4
N
WE
S
♠J 10 9 4 2
♥Q 3
♦A 10 4
♣10 9 2
♠A Q 7 5
♥10 9 7 6 5
♦7 5
♣J 3

NS 2♥; NS 1N; NS 1♠; NS 1♦; NS 1♣; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥S46206.930.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 6-Powell-Miller
2 NTN31505.791.2110-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
2 NTW−21004.642.362-Newel-Newel vs 10-Tweed-Burden
2 ♥S−11002.934.075-Tingey-Huebner vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
2 ♥S−11002.934.079-James-Smith vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
2 NTN−33000.646.361-Blanchard-Pardun vs 8-High-Sadler
2 NTN−33000.646.364-Nemechek-Berman vs 3-Graham-Boyd

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
♠8
♥A 9 7 4 2
♦9 8 6
♣A Q 9 6
♠9
♥Q J 8 6 5
♦K Q 7 4
♣J 10 7
N
WE
S
♠J 6 5 4
♥3
♦A 5 2
♣K 5 4 3 2
♠A K Q 10 7 3 2
♥K 10
♦J 10 3
♣8

NS 4♠; NS 3N; NS 1♥; NS 1♦; EW 1♣; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠S44207.000.006-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 6-Powell-Miller
2 ♠S52006.001.005-Tingey-Huebner vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
2 ♠S31404.003.002-Newel-Newel vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 ♠S31404.003.004-Nemechek-Berman vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
3 ♠S31404.003.0010-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 3-Graham-Boyd
4 ♠S−1501.006.001-Blanchard-Pardun vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 ♠S−1501.006.003-McGinnis-Brock vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
4 ♠S−1501.006.0011-Geary-Willoughby vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
♠9
♥K Q 6 4 3
♦K 10 8 7 5
♣A 6
♠A K Q 8 7
♥J 9 7
♦6
♣K Q 9 8
N
WE
S
♠10 5 4
♥A 10 8 2
♦A J 9
♣10 7 2
♠J 6 3 2
♥5
♦Q 4 3 2
♣J 5 4 3

E 5♠; EW 4N; W 4♠; EW 3♥; EW 4♣; NS 2♦; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠W−21006.500.504-Nemechek-Berman vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 ♠W−21006.500.505-Tingey-Huebner vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
1 NTE1905.002.0010-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 3-Graham-Boyd
2 ♠W31403.503.506-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 6-Powell-Miller
1 ♠W31403.503.5011-Geary-Willoughby vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 ♠W41701.006.001-Blanchard-Pardun vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 ♠W41701.006.002-Newel-Newel vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
1 ♠W41701.006.003-McGinnis-Brock vs 11-Vieira-Druffel

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠K 10 9 7 6
♥5
♦6 5 2
♣A Q 8 3
♠Q 4
♥A K Q 8 3
♦A K Q J 10 9
♣—
N
WE
S
♠A J 8 2
♥J 6 4 2
♦7 4
♣7 5 2
♠5 3
♥10 9 7
♦8 3
♣K J 10 9 6 4

EW 7♥; EW 7♦; EW 2♠; EW 1N; NS 2♣; Par −1510

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♥W72607.000.002-Newel-Newel vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
5 ♦W64206.001.003-McGinnis-Brock vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
5 ♦W74405.002.005-Tingey-Huebner vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 ♥W64803.004.001-Blanchard-Pardun vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 ♥W64803.004.004-Nemechek-Berman vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 ♥W64803.004.0010-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 3-Graham-Boyd
6 ♥W710100.506.506-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 6-Powell-Miller
6 ♥W710100.506.5011-Geary-Willoughby vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠J
♥Q 9 8
♦K 10 9 7 4 3
♣A J 5
♠9 6 5 3
♥A 6 5
♦J 2
♣8 7 3 2
N
WE
S
♠K 8 7 2
♥K J 10 7 3 2
♦A
♣Q 4
♠A Q 10 4
♥4
♦Q 8 6 5
♣K 10 9 6

NS 5♦; NS 3♣; EW 1♥; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♦S54006.930.071-Blanchard-Pardun vs 6-Powell-Miller
3 ♥E−33005.791.216-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 ♦N51502.934.072-Newel-Newel vs 8-High-Sadler
4 ♦N51502.934.073-McGinnis-Brock vs 10-Tweed-Burden
3 ♦N51502.934.077-Deyager-Infausto vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 ♦N51502.934.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
2 NTN−21000.076.935-Tingey-Huebner vs 3-Graham-Boyd

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
♠K 6
♥Q 10 9 6 3
♦8 6 4 2
♣A 8
♠A 7 4 3 2
♥8 7 5
♦J 3
♣10 4 3
N
WE
S
♠10 9 5
♥K 4 2
♦A K 10
♣Q 9 7 6
♠Q J 8
♥A J
♦Q 9 7 5
♣K J 5 2

NS 4♦; NS 2N; NS 2♥; NS 2♣; NS 1♠; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♥N31406.930.077-Deyager-Infausto vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
2 ♥N21104.642.361-Blanchard-Pardun vs 6-Powell-Miller
2 ♥S21104.642.362-Newel-Newel vs 8-High-Sadler
2 ♦S31104.642.363-McGinnis-Brock vs 10-Tweed-Burden
1 NTE1902.364.645-Tingey-Huebner vs 3-Graham-Boyd
2 NTS−11000.646.366-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
2 NTS−11000.646.3611-Geary-Willoughby vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠J
♥Q 5
♦Q 8 6 5 2
♣K Q 7 6 2
♠9 8 5
♥J 8 6 4
♦K J 10 9 4
♣5
N
WE
S
♠A K 10 6
♥A 10 9 3
♦A
♣A J 10 3
♠Q 7 4 3 2
♥K 7 2
♦7 3
♣9 8 4

EW 5♥; EW 4♠; EW 3N; EW 3♦; EW 2♣; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♦W−21006.930.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 ♥W−1505.791.213-McGinnis-Brock vs 10-Tweed-Burden
2 NTE31504.072.932-Newel-Newel vs 8-High-Sadler
1 NTE31504.072.936-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 NTE34002.364.647-Deyager-Infausto vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 NTE44301.215.795-Tingey-Huebner vs 3-Graham-Boyd
3 NTE54600.076.931-Blanchard-Pardun vs 6-Powell-Miller

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠10 2
♥Q 5 3
♦A J 7 2
♣K 9 7 4
♠K 4
♥A J 10 8 7 2
♦5 4 3
♣A 2
N
WE
S
♠Q 9 8 6 3
♥4
♦Q 6
♣10 8 6 5 3
♠A J 7 5
♥K 9 6
♦K 10 9 8
♣Q J

NS 3N; NS 2♦; NS 1♠; NS 1♥; NS 1♣; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN44307.000.002-Newel-Newel vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
2 ♥W−22005.501.501-Blanchard-Pardun vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 ♥W−22005.501.508-Comporato-Kendall vs 8-High-Sadler
3 ♦S31103.503.503-McGinnis-Brock vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 ♦S31103.503.505-Tingey-Huebner vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
3 ♦S−1502.005.004-Nemechek-Berman vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
3 NTS−21001.006.007-Deyager-Infausto vs 6-Powell-Miller
2 ♥W21100.007.006-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
♠9 7 5
♥K 9 6 5 2
♦6 2
♣7 3 2
♠A Q
♥A Q J 4
♦A K Q 4 3
♣K 8
N
WE
S
♠K J 4
♥8
♦J 9 8 7 5
♣Q J 9 6
♠10 8 6 3 2
♥10 7 3
♦10
♣A 10 5 4

W 6N; EW 6♦; E 5N; EW 5♣; EW 3♠; EW 2♥; Par −1440

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 NTW−11007.000.004-Nemechek-Berman vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
5 ♦E66205.002.001-Blanchard-Pardun vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
5 ♦E66205.002.005-Tingey-Huebner vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
5 ♦E66205.002.008-Comporato-Kendall vs 8-High-Sadler
3 NTW56603.004.007-Deyager-Infausto vs 6-Powell-Miller
3 NTW66901.006.002-Newel-Newel vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 NTW66901.006.003-McGinnis-Brock vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 NTW66901.006.006-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
♠Q 10 8 6 4
♥K 8 6
♦K Q 6
♣7 4
♠J 9 7
♥J 7 5 2
♦J
♣K J 8 3 2
N
WE
S
♠2
♥A 9 3
♦8 7 3 2
♣Q 10 9 6 5
♠A K 5 3
♥Q 10 4
♦A 10 9 5 4
♣A

NS 6♠; NS 6♦; NS 5N; NS 2♥; EW 2♣; Par +980

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♠×N67507.000.004-Nemechek-Berman vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
4 ♠S64803.503.501-Blanchard-Pardun vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
4 ♠N64803.503.502-Newel-Newel vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 ♠N64803.503.503-McGinnis-Brock vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
4 ♠N64803.503.505-Tingey-Huebner vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 ♠N64803.503.506-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 ♠N64803.503.507-Deyager-Infausto vs 6-Powell-Miller
4 ♠N54500.007.008-Comporato-Kendall vs 8-High-Sadler

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠J 9
♥Q 8
♦K J 9 8
♣A K Q 7 2
♠A 7 4
♥A K 10 9 6 5
♦7 6 5 3
♣—
N
WE
S
♠K Q 5 2
♥4 3 2
♦A
♣J 10 8 6 5
♠10 8 6 3
♥J 7
♦Q 10 4 2
♣9 4 3

EW 6♥; EW 4N; EW 4♠; EW 2♦; EW 1♣; Par −1430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♥W52005.791.212-Newel-Newel vs 6-Powell-Miller
2 ♥W52005.791.217-Deyager-Infausto vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
2 ♥W52005.791.218-Comporato-Kendall vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 ♥W62303.503.506-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 3-Graham-Boyd
4 ♠S−52502.364.649-James-Smith vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
4 ♥W46201.215.793-McGinnis-Brock vs 8-High-Sadler
4 ♥W66800.076.934-Nemechek-Berman vs 10-Tweed-Burden

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
♠A 6
♥A K 8 4 3
♦8
♣K J 7 5 3
♠J
♥10
♦A K Q J 10 9 5 2
♣A 9 8
N
WE
S
♠K 9 8 7 3 2
♥J 9 5 2
♦—
♣Q 10 4
♠Q 10 5 4
♥Q 7 6
♦7 6 4 3
♣6 2

EW 3N; NS 3♥; EW 4♦; N 1♠; NS 1♣; Par −200: NS 4♥×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♦W−22006.930.073-McGinnis-Brock vs 8-High-Sadler
5 ♦E−11005.211.792-Newel-Newel vs 6-Powell-Miller
5 ♦W−11005.211.796-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 3-Graham-Boyd
4 ♦W41302.364.647-Deyager-Infausto vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
4 ♦W41302.364.648-Comporato-Kendall vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 ♦W41302.364.649-James-Smith vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
5 ♦W56000.076.934-Nemechek-Berman vs 10-Tweed-Burden

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
♠A 7 6 3 2
♥A K 9 7
♦A 7 4
♣10
♠Q J 9 5
♥5 2
♦Q J 10 3
♣K 8 4
N
WE
S
♠10 4
♥Q J 10 8 4 3
♦8 6 2
♣Q 9
♠K 8
♥6
♦K 9 5
♣A J 7 6 5 3 2

NS 3N; NS 5♣; NS 3♠; NS 2♥; NS 3♦; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN64906.930.074-Nemechek-Berman vs 10-Tweed-Burden
3 NTN54605.791.212-Newel-Newel vs 6-Powell-Miller
3 NTN44304.072.936-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 3-Graham-Boyd
3 NTN44304.072.938-Comporato-Kendall vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
5 ♣S64202.364.643-McGinnis-Brock vs 8-High-Sadler
3 ♣S51501.215.797-Deyager-Infausto vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 ♣S41300.076.939-James-Smith vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler

Board 28
West Deals
N-S Vul
♠Q 10 6 5 4
♥10 8 7
♦9 6
♣8 5 4
♠7
♥4
♦K 5 4 2
♣K Q J 10 9 6 3
N
WE
S
♠K 8 3 2
♥9 5
♦A Q 10 7 3
♣A 2
♠A J 9
♥A K Q J 6 3 2
♦J 8
♣7

NS 4♥; EW 5♦; EW 5♣; NS 2♠; Par −200: NS 5♥×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♥S66807.000.009-James-Smith vs 8-High-Sadler
6 ♣W−1506.001.007-Deyager-Infausto vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
5 ♥S−11005.002.003-McGinnis-Brock vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
5 ♥S−22004.003.008-Comporato-Kendall vs 6-Powell-Miller
5 ♣W54003.004.005-Tingey-Huebner vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
5 ♣W64201.006.004-Nemechek-Berman vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
5 ♣W64201.006.006-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
5 ♣W64201.006.0010-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 10-Tweed-Burden

Board 29
North Deals
Both Vul
♠9 4 2
♥A Q J 10
♦K 7 6 4 3
♣6
♠A K 8 7
♥9 8
♦A Q 9 8 5
♣K 5
N
WE
S
♠6
♥K 5 4 2
♦J
♣A Q J 10 8 3 2
♠Q J 10 5 3
♥7 6 3
♦10 2
♣9 7 4

EW 6♣; EW 5N; EW 3♥; EW 2♠; EW 3♦; Par −1370

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠W−11006.001.004-Nemechek-Berman vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
5 ♣E−11006.001.006-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
6 ♣E−11006.001.0010-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 10-Tweed-Burden
2 ♦W31104.003.007-Deyager-Infausto vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 NTE36003.004.003-McGinnis-Brock vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
5 ♣E66202.005.009-James-Smith vs 8-High-Sadler
3 NTW56601.006.005-Tingey-Huebner vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
6 ♣E613700.007.008-Comporato-Kendall vs 6-Powell-Miller

Board 30
East Deals
None Vul
♠9 8 6
♥A 10 6 3
♦K 10 6 4 3
♣K
♠Q J 10 4
♥K
♦9 8 7
♣A 9 7 6 3
N
WE
S
♠A 7 5
♥J 7 4
♦A J 5
♣Q 5 4 2
♠K 3 2
♥Q 9 8 5 2
♦Q 2
♣J 10 8

NS 3♥; EW 2♠; EW 3♣; NS 1N; NS 1♦; Par +100: EW 3♠×−1; EW 4♣×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠W−21006.500.505-Tingey-Huebner vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
1 NTE−21006.500.508-Comporato-Kendall vs 6-Powell-Miller
3 ♠W−1504.502.503-McGinnis-Brock vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 ♠W−1504.502.507-Deyager-Infausto vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 ♥S−1503.004.009-James-Smith vs 8-High-Sadler
2 ♣E2901.505.504-Nemechek-Berman vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 ♣E2901.505.506-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 ♥S−21000.007.0010-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 10-Tweed-Burden

Board 31
South Deals
N-S Vul
♠A Q 7 6
♥K J 5
♦10 5
♣10 6 5 3
♠9 2
♥A Q 8 7 4 2
♦A 9 2
♣K 8
N
WE
S
♠10
♥6
♦K Q J 8 7 6 4 3
♣A J 9
♠K J 8 5 4 3
♥10 9 3
♦—
♣Q 7 4 2

EW 6♦; NS 2♠; E 2♥; NS 3♣; EW 1N; W 1♥; Par −920

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♦E54006.360.645-Tingey-Huebner vs 10-Tweed-Burden
5 ♦E54006.360.6411-Geary-Willoughby vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
5 ♦E64202.934.074-Nemechek-Berman vs 8-High-Sadler
5 ♦E64202.934.077-Deyager-Infausto vs 3-Graham-Boyd
5 ♦E64202.934.078-Comporato-Kendall vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
5 ♦E64202.934.0710-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
6 ♦E69200.076.939-James-Smith vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst

Board 32
West Deals
E-W Vul
♠K 7 4
♥K Q 6 4
♦A Q 9 2
♣8 2
♠A
♥A J 10 9 3
♦K J 8 7
♣Q 7 6
N
WE
S
♠Q 8 2
♥7 5
♦4
♣A K J 10 9 4 3
♠J 10 9 6 5 3
♥8 2
♦10 6 5 3
♣5

W 4N; W 4♥; E 3N; EW 5♣; E 3♥; NS 2♠; NS 1♦; Par −500: NS 5♠×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 ♣E−11006.930.077-Deyager-Infausto vs 3-Graham-Boyd
5 ♣E56004.642.365-Tingey-Huebner vs 10-Tweed-Burden
5 ♣E56004.642.369-James-Smith vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 NTW36004.642.3610-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 NTW46302.364.648-Comporato-Kendall vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 NTW56601.215.7911-Geary-Willoughby vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
3 NTW66900.076.934-Nemechek-Berman vs 8-High-Sadler

Board 33
North Deals
None Vul
♠A Q 9 3
♥A 8 7 3
♦A 5
♣A K 6
♠4 2
♥Q J 10 6
♦8 7 3 2
♣J 5 4
N
WE
S
♠K 10 8
♥K 2
♦K Q 10 9 6 4
♣Q 9
♠J 7 6 5
♥9 5 4
♦J
♣10 8 7 3 2

NS 3♠; NS 2♥; NS 3♣; NS 1N; EW 2♦; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTN21206.930.077-Deyager-Infausto vs 3-Graham-Boyd
1 NTN1905.791.218-Comporato-Kendall vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
2 NTN−1504.072.934-Nemechek-Berman vs 8-High-Sadler
2 NTN−1504.072.9310-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 ♦E2902.364.645-Tingey-Huebner vs 10-Tweed-Burden
3 NTN−21001.215.7911-Geary-Willoughby vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
2 NTN−31500.076.939-James-Smith vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst