Maggie's 750 Pairs Tuesday Aft Session April 28, 2015
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  M  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  7   58.85   98.87  C   1     1     1    0.88(A)  Joan Deyager - Marsha Infausto
  5   53.85   90.46  B   2     2          0.62(A)  Cynthia Tingey - JoAnn Huebner
  8   53.13   89.25  C   3     3     2    0.44(A)  Sue Comporato - Marilyn J. Kendall
  3   52.63   88.42  A   4                0.31(A)  Pearl McGinnis - Barbara Brock
  1   52.14   87.59  C                             Karin Blanchard - Judy Pardun
 11   51.15   85.93  B                             Judy Geary - Carol Willoughby
  2   50.92   85.54  C                             Jeremy Newel - Michael Newel
  9   49.53   83.21  B                             Joan James - Elaine J. Smith
 10   44.05   74.00  A                             Angelina Heisdorf - Annie Chiljian
  4   42.75   71.82  C                             Nadine Nemechek - Donna Berman
  6   41.77   70.18  A                             Janet Blumberg - Stephen Blumberg
Maggie's 750 Pairs Tuesday Aft Session April 28, 2015
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  M  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  5   56.29   94.57  B   1     1          0.88(A)  Deb Petersen - Barbara Wiedel
 11   53.67   90.16  A   2                0.62(A)  Ron Vieira - Barry Druffel
  9   53.48   89.85  B   3     2          0.44(A)  Renee Laquerriere - Judy Nibler
  8   52.51   88.22  C   4     3     1    0.31(A)  Lois High - Ann Sadler
 10   51.74   86.93  B                             Denny Tweed - Cathleen Burden
  7   49.44   83.06  C               2    0.17(C)  Edward Grootendorst - Therese Grootendorst
  2   48.17   80.93  C                             Fran Beazley - Marge Samuelson
  3   47.07   79.07  A                             Suzanne Graham - Paul Boyd
  4   44.98   75.57  C                             Ruth Reynolds - John Donaldson
  6   42.64   71.64  A                             Dick Powell - Carol Miller

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
K 9 5 4 3
J 10 6 5
K 8
Q 10
Q
A K 7
J 4 2
J 8 7 6 3 2
N
WE
S
A J 8 7 2
4 3
A 10 5
K 5 4
10 6
Q 9 8 2
Q 9 7 6 3
A 9

EW 4; EW 2N; EW 1; NS 1; EW 1; Par −130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 W−21006.930.077-Deyager-Infausto vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
2 NTW−1505.791.2110-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 8-High-Sadler
2 E21104.642.369-James-Smith vs 6-Powell-Miller
3 W41303.503.508-Comporato-Kendall vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 W51502.364.645-Tingey-Huebner vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 NTW41801.215.796-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
3 NTW34000.076.9311-Geary-Willoughby vs 10-Tweed-Burden

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
A Q 10 8 5
A 7
A Q 10
K 7 2
9 6
9 8 6 5 4
6 4 3
9 5 3
N
WE
S
K 3
Q J 10 3 2
9 8 7
A 10 4
J 7 4 2
K
K J 5 2
Q J 8 6

NS 5; NS 4N; NS 5; NS 5; NS 2; Par +650

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N56504.072.935-Tingey-Huebner vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
4 N56504.072.936-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
4 N56504.072.937-Deyager-Infausto vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 N56504.072.938-Comporato-Kendall vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 N56504.072.939-James-Smith vs 6-Powell-Miller
4 N56504.072.9311-Geary-Willoughby vs 10-Tweed-Burden
6 ×N−12000.076.9310-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 8-High-Sadler

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
J 4 2
K 6 4
J 9 6
K Q J 10
A 9
10 8 3
K Q 7 5 2
8 5 4
N
WE
S
7 6 5
A J 9 7 5 2
4
A 9 6
K Q 10 8 3
Q
A 10 8 3
7 3 2

NS 2; EW 2; EW 1N; NS 1; NS 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S31406.930.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 10-Tweed-Burden
2 S21105.211.797-Deyager-Infausto vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
2 S21105.211.799-James-Smith vs 6-Powell-Miller
3 S−21002.934.075-Tingey-Huebner vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 N−21002.934.078-Comporato-Kendall vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
2 E31401.215.7910-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 8-High-Sadler
4 E46200.076.936-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 11-Vieira-Druffel

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
A J 9 7
A 6 5
A Q 8 2
8 4
K 10 5 2
J 8 2
10 4
A K Q 3
N
WE
S
8 4 3
9
K J 9 7 5
J 7 5 2
Q 6
K Q 10 7 4 3
6 3
10 9 6

NS 4; NS 3N; W 2; NS 1; W 1; E 1; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S46206.360.646-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 10-Tweed-Burden
4 N46206.360.648-Comporato-Kendall vs 3-Graham-Boyd
2 N41704.642.361-Blanchard-Pardun vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
2 S31402.934.0710-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
1 S31402.934.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 S−11000.646.362-Newel-Newel vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 S−11000.646.369-James-Smith vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
A 5 4
K 9 4
A 9 3 2
K 10 4
K Q 8
A 10 8 7 6 3 2
J 10 4
N
WE
S
J 9
K Q 7 6
Q 9 7 6 5 3 2
10 7 6 3 2
Q J 5
8 5
A J 8

EW 2; NS 1N; S 1; EW 1; EW 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−21006.360.641-Blanchard-Pardun vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
3 W−21006.360.6410-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 W−1504.642.368-Comporato-Kendall vs 3-Graham-Boyd
2 NTN−11003.503.502-Newel-Newel vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
3 S−22001.215.796-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 10-Tweed-Burden
3 S−22001.215.799-James-Smith vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 S−22001.215.7911-Geary-Willoughby vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
J 4
A Q 7
A 6 3 2
Q 10 8 5
K 9 8 6 5 2
K 10 6
K J 5 4
N
WE
S
A Q
J 4 3 2
Q 8
K 9 7 6 3
10 7 3
9 8 5
10 9 7
A J 4 2

EW 3; W 2; EW 1N; E 1; EW 1; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTE−22006.930.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 NTE−11005.791.218-Comporato-Kendall vs 3-Graham-Boyd
1 NTE1904.642.3610-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 NTS−31503.503.509-James-Smith vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
2 W41701.215.791-Blanchard-Pardun vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
2 W41701.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
2 W41701.215.796-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 10-Tweed-Burden

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
A J 10 7 6 2
3
J 8 3 2
10 6
9 8
Q J 10 7
K Q 5 4
Q 5 4
N
WE
S
Q 5 3
4
A 10 7 6
K J 9 7 3
K 4
A K 9 8 6 5 2
9
A 8 2

EW 2N; NS 2; NS 2; EW 2; EW 2; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S31406.360.643-McGinnis-Brock vs 3-Graham-Boyd
3 S31406.360.649-James-Smith vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 S−11002.934.071-Blanchard-Pardun vs 10-Tweed-Burden
4 S−11002.934.077-Deyager-Infausto vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
3 S−11002.934.078-Comporato-Kendall vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
3 S−11002.934.0710-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 6-Powell-Miller
4 S−22000.076.9311-Geary-Willoughby vs 8-High-Sadler

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
10
K 8 5
K 10 9 6 5
8 7 4 3
A 6 4 3
A Q 7 2
Q J 4 3
Q
N
WE
S
K J 9 8 5 2
10 9 3
8
A K 6
Q 7
J 6 4
A 7 2
J 10 9 5 2

EW 5; EW 4N; EW 4; EW 1; EW 1; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E44206.930.079-James-Smith vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 E54502.934.071-Blanchard-Pardun vs 10-Tweed-Burden
4 E54502.934.073-McGinnis-Brock vs 3-Graham-Boyd
4 E54502.934.077-Deyager-Infausto vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
4 E54502.934.078-Comporato-Kendall vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 E54502.934.0710-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 6-Powell-Miller
4 E54502.934.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 8-High-Sadler

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
K 6 2
8
J 7 6 3 2
Q 8 6 4
J 10
A J 7 5
A Q 8 5
10 9 5
N
WE
S
8 5 4
K 10 9
10 9 4
A K 3 2
A Q 9 7 3
Q 6 4 3 2
K
J 7

EW 2N; EW 2; EW 2; NS 1; EW 1; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S41706.930.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 8-High-Sadler
3 S31405.791.219-James-Smith vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 S−21004.072.931-Blanchard-Pardun vs 10-Tweed-Burden
3 S−21004.072.937-Deyager-Infausto vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
3 E31102.364.6410-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 6-Powell-Miller
3 S−31500.646.363-McGinnis-Brock vs 3-Graham-Boyd
4 S−31500.646.368-Comporato-Kendall vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
A 9 8 7 4
A Q J 2
A 9
K 7
Q 10 5 3
8 7
Q 7 2
9 6 5 2
N
WE
S
K 6
10 5
K 8 4
A Q 10 8 4 3
J 2
K 9 6 4 3
J 10 6 5 3
J

NS 4; NS 2; NS 3; W 3; NS 1N; E 2; Par +500: W 5×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S46205.791.211-Blanchard-Pardun vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
4 S46205.791.212-Newel-Newel vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
4 S46205.791.2111-Geary-Willoughby vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 S41702.934.073-McGinnis-Brock vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
2 S41702.934.0710-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 N31401.215.794-Nemechek-Berman vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
2 S2900.076.939-James-Smith vs 3-Graham-Boyd

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
A 4 2
9 7
9 8 5 2
J 9 7 3
K 8 6
A 10 3
A K 7 6
A Q 5
N
WE
S
J 10 7
K 8 6 2
Q 10 4 3
10 4
Q 9 5 3
Q J 5 4
J
K 8 6 2

EW 4N; EW 4; E 5; E 3; W 4; W 2; EW 2; Par −430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−1506.360.643-McGinnis-Brock vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
3 NTW−1506.360.649-James-Smith vs 3-Graham-Boyd
2 W2904.642.364-Nemechek-Berman vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 NTW34002.934.071-Blanchard-Pardun vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 NTW34002.934.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 NTW44301.215.7910-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 NTW54600.076.932-Newel-Newel vs 11-Vieira-Druffel

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
A K 10 8
A K 8 5 2
K 8 6
10
4
Q 7 6 4
10 5 4
A Q 8 7 4
N
WE
S
Q J 7 6 5 3
J 10
7
K 9 5 2
9 2
9 3
A Q J 9 3 2
J 6 3

NS 5; NS 3; NS 2N; EW 2; NS 1; Par +600

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTN52106.930.079-James-Smith vs 3-Graham-Boyd
3 S51505.791.213-McGinnis-Brock vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 S41304.072.931-Blanchard-Pardun vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 S41304.072.9311-Geary-Willoughby vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 S−11001.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
5 S−11001.215.794-Nemechek-Berman vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
5 S−11001.215.7910-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
9 7 6 3
6 5
A Q 10 3 2
8 7
10 4
K 10 9 8
K 4
A 10 9 6 5
N
WE
S
K Q J 8 2
A J 7 4
7
Q 4 3
A 5
Q 3 2
J 9 8 6 5
K J 2

EW 4; EW 3; EW 4; NS 3; Par −500: NS 5×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−11006.930.071-Blanchard-Pardun vs 8-High-Sadler
3 N−11005.791.212-Newel-Newel vs 10-Tweed-Burden
3 E31404.072.935-Tingey-Huebner vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 E31404.072.9311-Geary-Willoughby vs 6-Powell-Miller
4 E46201.215.794-Nemechek-Berman vs 3-Graham-Boyd
4 W46201.215.799-James-Smith vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 E46201.215.7910-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
J 10 8 5
Q 10 6 2
7 5
10 5 4
9 7 5
K J 9 3
Q J 9 8 6 2
N
WE
S
9
A K J 3
A Q 6 4 2
K 7 3
A K Q 7 6 4 3 2
8 4
10 8
A

EW 6; EW 6; EW 5; NS 3; Par −500: NS 6×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S−1505.791.215-Tingey-Huebner vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
4 S−1505.791.219-James-Smith vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 S−1505.791.2111-Geary-Willoughby vs 6-Powell-Miller
5 S−21003.503.501-Blanchard-Pardun vs 8-High-Sadler
5 ×S−23001.795.214-Nemechek-Berman vs 3-Graham-Boyd
5 ×S−23001.795.2110-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
6 ×E610900.076.932-Newel-Newel vs 10-Tweed-Burden

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
8 6
K J
K Q 8 6 3
A Q 6 5
K 3
A 8 4 2
J 9 2
K 8 7 4
N
WE
S
J 10 9 4 2
Q 3
A 10 4
10 9 2
A Q 7 5
10 9 7 6 5
7 5
J 3

NS 2; NS 1N; NS 1; NS 1; NS 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S46206.930.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 6-Powell-Miller
2 NTN31505.791.2110-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
2 NTW−21004.642.362-Newel-Newel vs 10-Tweed-Burden
2 S−11002.934.075-Tingey-Huebner vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
2 S−11002.934.079-James-Smith vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
2 NTN−33000.646.361-Blanchard-Pardun vs 8-High-Sadler
2 NTN−33000.646.364-Nemechek-Berman vs 3-Graham-Boyd

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
8
A 9 7 4 2
9 8 6
A Q 9 6
9
Q J 8 6 5
K Q 7 4
J 10 7
N
WE
S
J 6 5 4
3
A 5 2
K 5 4 3 2
A K Q 10 7 3 2
K 10
J 10 3
8

NS 4; NS 3N; NS 1; NS 1; EW 1; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S44207.000.006-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 6-Powell-Miller
2 S52006.001.005-Tingey-Huebner vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
2 S31404.003.002-Newel-Newel vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 S31404.003.004-Nemechek-Berman vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
3 S31404.003.0010-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 3-Graham-Boyd
4 S−1501.006.001-Blanchard-Pardun vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 S−1501.006.003-McGinnis-Brock vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
4 S−1501.006.0011-Geary-Willoughby vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
9
K Q 6 4 3
K 10 8 7 5
A 6
A K Q 8 7
J 9 7
6
K Q 9 8
N
WE
S
10 5 4
A 10 8 2
A J 9
10 7 2
J 6 3 2
5
Q 4 3 2
J 5 4 3

E 5; EW 4N; W 4; EW 3; EW 4; NS 2; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−21006.500.504-Nemechek-Berman vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 W−21006.500.505-Tingey-Huebner vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
1 NTE1905.002.0010-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 3-Graham-Boyd
2 W31403.503.506-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 6-Powell-Miller
1 W31403.503.5011-Geary-Willoughby vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 W41701.006.001-Blanchard-Pardun vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 W41701.006.002-Newel-Newel vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
1 W41701.006.003-McGinnis-Brock vs 11-Vieira-Druffel

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
K 10 9 7 6
5
6 5 2
A Q 8 3
Q 4
A K Q 8 3
A K Q J 10 9
N
WE
S
A J 8 2
J 6 4 2
7 4
7 5 2
5 3
10 9 7
8 3
K J 10 9 6 4

EW 7; EW 7; EW 2; EW 1N; NS 2; Par −1510

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 W72607.000.002-Newel-Newel vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
5 W64206.001.003-McGinnis-Brock vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
5 W74405.002.005-Tingey-Huebner vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 W64803.004.001-Blanchard-Pardun vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 W64803.004.004-Nemechek-Berman vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 W64803.004.0010-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 3-Graham-Boyd
6 W710100.506.506-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 6-Powell-Miller
6 W710100.506.5011-Geary-Willoughby vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
J
Q 9 8
K 10 9 7 4 3
A J 5
9 6 5 3
A 6 5
J 2
8 7 3 2
N
WE
S
K 8 7 2
K J 10 7 3 2
A
Q 4
A Q 10 4
4
Q 8 6 5
K 10 9 6

NS 5; NS 3; EW 1; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 S54006.930.071-Blanchard-Pardun vs 6-Powell-Miller
3 E−33005.791.216-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 N51502.934.072-Newel-Newel vs 8-High-Sadler
4 N51502.934.073-McGinnis-Brock vs 10-Tweed-Burden
3 N51502.934.077-Deyager-Infausto vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 N51502.934.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
2 NTN−21000.076.935-Tingey-Huebner vs 3-Graham-Boyd

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
K 6
Q 10 9 6 3
8 6 4 2
A 8
A 7 4 3 2
8 7 5
J 3
10 4 3
N
WE
S
10 9 5
K 4 2
A K 10
Q 9 7 6
Q J 8
A J
Q 9 7 5
K J 5 2

NS 4; NS 2N; NS 2; NS 2; NS 1; Par +130

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N31406.930.077-Deyager-Infausto vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
2 N21104.642.361-Blanchard-Pardun vs 6-Powell-Miller
2 S21104.642.362-Newel-Newel vs 8-High-Sadler
2 S31104.642.363-McGinnis-Brock vs 10-Tweed-Burden
1 NTE1902.364.645-Tingey-Huebner vs 3-Graham-Boyd
2 NTS−11000.646.366-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
2 NTS−11000.646.3611-Geary-Willoughby vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
J
Q 5
Q 8 6 5 2
K Q 7 6 2
9 8 5
J 8 6 4
K J 10 9 4
5
N
WE
S
A K 10 6
A 10 9 3
A
A J 10 3
Q 7 4 3 2
K 7 2
7 3
9 8 4

EW 5; EW 4; EW 3N; EW 3; EW 2; Par −450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W−21006.930.0711-Geary-Willoughby vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 W−1505.791.213-McGinnis-Brock vs 10-Tweed-Burden
2 NTE31504.072.932-Newel-Newel vs 8-High-Sadler
1 NTE31504.072.936-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 NTE34002.364.647-Deyager-Infausto vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 NTE44301.215.795-Tingey-Huebner vs 3-Graham-Boyd
3 NTE54600.076.931-Blanchard-Pardun vs 6-Powell-Miller

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
10 2
Q 5 3
A J 7 2
K 9 7 4
K 4
A J 10 8 7 2
5 4 3
A 2
N
WE
S
Q 9 8 6 3
4
Q 6
10 8 6 5 3
A J 7 5
K 9 6
K 10 9 8
Q J

NS 3N; NS 2; NS 1; NS 1; NS 1; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN44307.000.002-Newel-Newel vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
2 W−22005.501.501-Blanchard-Pardun vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 W−22005.501.508-Comporato-Kendall vs 8-High-Sadler
3 S31103.503.503-McGinnis-Brock vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 S31103.503.505-Tingey-Huebner vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
3 S−1502.005.004-Nemechek-Berman vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
3 NTS−21001.006.007-Deyager-Infausto vs 6-Powell-Miller
2 W21100.007.006-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
9 7 5
K 9 6 5 2
6 2
7 3 2
A Q
A Q J 4
A K Q 4 3
K 8
N
WE
S
K J 4
8
J 9 8 7 5
Q J 9 6
10 8 6 3 2
10 7 3
10
A 10 5 4

W 6N; EW 6; E 5N; EW 5; EW 3; EW 2; Par −1440

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 NTW−11007.000.004-Nemechek-Berman vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
5 E66205.002.001-Blanchard-Pardun vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
5 E66205.002.005-Tingey-Huebner vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
5 E66205.002.008-Comporato-Kendall vs 8-High-Sadler
3 NTW56603.004.007-Deyager-Infausto vs 6-Powell-Miller
3 NTW66901.006.002-Newel-Newel vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 NTW66901.006.003-McGinnis-Brock vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 NTW66901.006.006-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
Q 10 8 6 4
K 8 6
K Q 6
7 4
J 9 7
J 7 5 2
J
K J 8 3 2
N
WE
S
2
A 9 3
8 7 3 2
Q 10 9 6 5
A K 5 3
Q 10 4
A 10 9 5 4
A

NS 6; NS 6; NS 5N; NS 2; EW 2; Par +980

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ×N67507.000.004-Nemechek-Berman vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
4 S64803.503.501-Blanchard-Pardun vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
4 N64803.503.502-Newel-Newel vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 N64803.503.503-McGinnis-Brock vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
4 N64803.503.505-Tingey-Huebner vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 N64803.503.506-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
4 N64803.503.507-Deyager-Infausto vs 6-Powell-Miller
4 N54500.007.008-Comporato-Kendall vs 8-High-Sadler

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
J 9
Q 8
K J 9 8
A K Q 7 2
A 7 4
A K 10 9 6 5
7 6 5 3
N
WE
S
K Q 5 2
4 3 2
A
J 10 8 6 5
10 8 6 3
J 7
Q 10 4 2
9 4 3

EW 6; EW 4N; EW 4; EW 2; EW 1; Par −1430

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 W52005.791.212-Newel-Newel vs 6-Powell-Miller
2 W52005.791.217-Deyager-Infausto vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
2 W52005.791.218-Comporato-Kendall vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 W62303.503.506-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 3-Graham-Boyd
4 S−52502.364.649-James-Smith vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
4 W46201.215.793-McGinnis-Brock vs 8-High-Sadler
4 W66800.076.934-Nemechek-Berman vs 10-Tweed-Burden

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
A 6
A K 8 4 3
8
K J 7 5 3
J
10
A K Q J 10 9 5 2
A 9 8
N
WE
S
K 9 8 7 3 2
J 9 5 2
Q 10 4
Q 10 5 4
Q 7 6
7 6 4 3
6 2

EW 3N; NS 3; EW 4; N 1; NS 1; Par −200: NS 4×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 W−22006.930.073-McGinnis-Brock vs 8-High-Sadler
5 E−11005.211.792-Newel-Newel vs 6-Powell-Miller
5 W−11005.211.796-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 3-Graham-Boyd
4 W41302.364.647-Deyager-Infausto vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
4 W41302.364.648-Comporato-Kendall vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
4 W41302.364.649-James-Smith vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
5 W56000.076.934-Nemechek-Berman vs 10-Tweed-Burden

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
A 7 6 3 2
A K 9 7
A 7 4
10
Q J 9 5
5 2
Q J 10 3
K 8 4
N
WE
S
10 4
Q J 10 8 4 3
8 6 2
Q 9
K 8
6
K 9 5
A J 7 6 5 3 2

NS 3N; NS 5; NS 3; NS 2; NS 3; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN64906.930.074-Nemechek-Berman vs 10-Tweed-Burden
3 NTN54605.791.212-Newel-Newel vs 6-Powell-Miller
3 NTN44304.072.936-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 3-Graham-Boyd
3 NTN44304.072.938-Comporato-Kendall vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
5 S64202.364.643-McGinnis-Brock vs 8-High-Sadler
3 S51501.215.797-Deyager-Infausto vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 S41300.076.939-James-Smith vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler

Board 28
West Deals
N-S Vul
Q 10 6 5 4
10 8 7
9 6
8 5 4
7
4
K 5 4 2
K Q J 10 9 6 3
N
WE
S
K 8 3 2
9 5
A Q 10 7 3
A 2
A J 9
A K Q J 6 3 2
J 8
7

NS 4; EW 5; EW 5; NS 2; Par −200: NS 5×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 S66807.000.009-James-Smith vs 8-High-Sadler
6 W−1506.001.007-Deyager-Infausto vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
5 S−11005.002.003-McGinnis-Brock vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
5 S−22004.003.008-Comporato-Kendall vs 6-Powell-Miller
5 W54003.004.005-Tingey-Huebner vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
5 W64201.006.004-Nemechek-Berman vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
5 W64201.006.006-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
5 W64201.006.0010-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 10-Tweed-Burden

Board 29
North Deals
Both Vul
9 4 2
A Q J 10
K 7 6 4 3
6
A K 8 7
9 8
A Q 9 8 5
K 5
N
WE
S
6
K 5 4 2
J
A Q J 10 8 3 2
Q J 10 5 3
7 6 3
10 2
9 7 4

EW 6; EW 5N; EW 3; EW 2; EW 3; Par −1370

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−11006.001.004-Nemechek-Berman vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
5 E−11006.001.006-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
6 E−11006.001.0010-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 10-Tweed-Burden
2 W31104.003.007-Deyager-Infausto vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 NTE36003.004.003-McGinnis-Brock vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
5 E66202.005.009-James-Smith vs 8-High-Sadler
3 NTW56601.006.005-Tingey-Huebner vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
6 E613700.007.008-Comporato-Kendall vs 6-Powell-Miller

Board 30
East Deals
None Vul
9 8 6
A 10 6 3
K 10 6 4 3
K
Q J 10 4
K
9 8 7
A 9 7 6 3
N
WE
S
A 7 5
J 7 4
A J 5
Q 5 4 2
K 3 2
Q 9 8 5 2
Q 2
J 10 8

NS 3; EW 2; EW 3; NS 1N; NS 1; Par +100: EW 3×−1; EW 4×−1

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−21006.500.505-Tingey-Huebner vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
1 NTE−21006.500.508-Comporato-Kendall vs 6-Powell-Miller
3 W−1504.502.503-McGinnis-Brock vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 W−1504.502.507-Deyager-Infausto vs 4-Reynolds-Donaldson
3 S−1503.004.009-James-Smith vs 8-High-Sadler
2 E2901.505.504-Nemechek-Berman vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 E2901.505.506-Blumberg-Blumberg vs 2-Beazley-Samuelson
4 S−21000.007.0010-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 10-Tweed-Burden

Board 31
South Deals
N-S Vul
A Q 7 6
K J 5
10 5
10 6 5 3
9 2
A Q 8 7 4 2
A 9 2
K 8
N
WE
S
10
6
K Q J 8 7 6 4 3
A J 9
K J 8 5 4 3
10 9 3
Q 7 4 2

EW 6; NS 2; E 2; NS 3; EW 1N; W 1; Par −920

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 E54006.360.645-Tingey-Huebner vs 10-Tweed-Burden
5 E54006.360.6411-Geary-Willoughby vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
5 E64202.934.074-Nemechek-Berman vs 8-High-Sadler
5 E64202.934.077-Deyager-Infausto vs 3-Graham-Boyd
5 E64202.934.078-Comporato-Kendall vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
5 E64202.934.0710-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
6 E69200.076.939-James-Smith vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst

Board 32
West Deals
E-W Vul
K 7 4
K Q 6 4
A Q 9 2
8 2
A
A J 10 9 3
K J 8 7
Q 7 6
N
WE
S
Q 8 2
7 5
4
A K J 10 9 4 3
J 10 9 6 5 3
8 2
10 6 5 3
5

W 4N; W 4; E 3N; EW 5; E 3; NS 2; NS 1; Par −500: NS 5×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 E−11006.930.077-Deyager-Infausto vs 3-Graham-Boyd
5 E56004.642.365-Tingey-Huebner vs 10-Tweed-Burden
5 E56004.642.369-James-Smith vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst
3 NTW36004.642.3610-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
3 NTW46302.364.648-Comporato-Kendall vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
3 NTW56601.215.7911-Geary-Willoughby vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
3 NTW66900.076.934-Nemechek-Berman vs 8-High-Sadler

Board 33
North Deals
None Vul
A Q 9 3
A 8 7 3
A 5
A K 6
4 2
Q J 10 6
8 7 3 2
J 5 4
N
WE
S
K 10 8
K 2
K Q 10 9 6 4
Q 9
J 7 6 5
9 5 4
J
10 8 7 3 2

NS 3; NS 2; NS 3; NS 1N; EW 2; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTN21206.930.077-Deyager-Infausto vs 3-Graham-Boyd
1 NTN1905.791.218-Comporato-Kendall vs 5-Petersen-Wiedel
2 NTN−1504.072.934-Nemechek-Berman vs 8-High-Sadler
2 NTN−1504.072.9310-Heisdorf-Chiljian vs 9-Laquerriere-Nibler
2 E2902.364.645-Tingey-Huebner vs 10-Tweed-Burden
3 NTN−21001.215.7911-Geary-Willoughby vs 11-Vieira-Druffel
2 NTN−31500.076.939-James-Smith vs 7-Grootendorst-Grootendorst