750 Thursday Aft Session May 7, 2015
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  B  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  5   54.76   92.00  B   1     1          1.03(A)  Patricia Creede - Renee Laquerriere
 11   53.70   90.22  C   2     2     1    0.72(A)  Ann Sadler - Karin Blanchard
  3   52.93   88.93  A   3                0.52(A)  Martha Waller - Virginia Johnson
  4   52.82   88.74  A   4                0.36(A)  Mary Ann Clark - Gay Berry
  8   50.13   84.22  A                             John Oakshott - Peggy Oakshott
  6   50.08   84.14  A                             Lois Layne - Ted Macaulay
  7   49.45   83.08  B                             Marlene Robinson - Barbara Kelley
  9   48.05   80.72  A                             Angelina Heisdorf - Sue Gearhart
  1   46.60   78.28  C                             Bill Rogers - Chris Rogers
  2   41.91   70.41  B                             Jeremy Newel - Michael Newel
750 Thursday Aft Session May 7, 2015
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  B  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  6   64.00  107.52  A   1                1.03(A)  Carol Miller - Mary Gullo
 10   56.38   94.72  C   2     1     1    0.76(B)  Don Myers - Doris Myers
  5   56.17   94.37  A   3                0.52(A)  Pat Huston - Nancy Holley
  9   54.70   91.89  B   4     2          0.53(B)  Lois High - Barbara Wiedel
  2   51.77   86.97  B         3          0.38(B)  William Coit - Larry Miller
  3   49.90   83.84  A                             Don Winton - Beverly Daniels
  1   48.89   82.14  C               2    0.39(C)  Jerry F. Noga - John Hempel
  7   44.66   75.03  C                             Nancy Schubert - Carol Levy
  8   44.61   74.94  C                             Anna Harguindeguy - Helen Smades
 11   44.17   74.20  B                             Deb Petersen - Cynthia Tingey
  4   34.99   58.79  C                             Betty Pash - Joanne Cohen

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
K
A 10 7 6 5 4 3
7 5
A 9 3
8 7 6 5
9
A 6 4 2
Q 7 6 5
N
WE
S
A 9 3 2
Q J 8
J 10 3
K 4 2
Q J 10 4
K 2
K Q 9 8
J 10 8

NS 3N; NS 3; NS 2; NS 3; NS 2; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N44205.791.211-Rogers-Rogers vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 N44205.791.216-Layne-Macaulay vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
4 N44205.791.218-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 N41703.503.505-Creede-Laquerriere vs 9-High-Wiedel
3 N31402.364.647-Robinson-Kelley vs 2-Coit-Miller
4 N−1501.215.7911-Sadler-Blanchard vs 10-Myers-Myers
5 N−21000.076.939-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 6-Miller-Gullo

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
5 3 2
A K 9 5 3
9 8 3
K 8
Q 8 7
6 4 2
2
A 7 6 5 3 2
N
WE
S
K J 9
10 8
J 10 7 5 4
J 9 4
A 10 6 4
Q J 7
A K Q 6
Q 10

NS 4N; NS 4; NS 4; NS 3; EW 2; Par +500: EW 5×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS56606.930.077-Robinson-Kelley vs 2-Coit-Miller
3 NTN46305.791.215-Creede-Laquerriere vs 9-High-Wiedel
4 N46203.503.506-Layne-Macaulay vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
4 S46203.503.508-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 4-Pash-Cohen
4 S46203.503.5011-Sadler-Blanchard vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 NTN36001.215.791-Rogers-Rogers vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 N41700.076.939-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 6-Miller-Gullo

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
J 6 3
9 7
J 9 2
K 7 5 4 2
7 5 4
K 8
10 6 5 4
10 9 8 6
N
WE
S
Q 10 9 2
Q 10 4 3
A 3
A Q 3
A K 8
A J 6 5 2
K Q 8 7
J

NS 2; NS 1N; NS 2; NS 1; N 1; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S31406.930.0711-Sadler-Blanchard vs 10-Myers-Myers
2 W−11005.791.216-Layne-Macaulay vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
2 S2904.642.367-Robinson-Kelley vs 2-Coit-Miller
3 S−1503.503.501-Rogers-Rogers vs 1-Noga-Hempel
2 W2902.364.645-Creede-Laquerriere vs 9-High-Wiedel
4 S−21000.646.368-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 NTN−21000.646.369-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 6-Miller-Gullo

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
10 6 5 4 2
8 7
J 7 2
9 8 7
Q 9 3
J 10 2
A Q 6 5
A K 5
N
WE
S
A K
A Q 3
9 8 4
Q J 6 3 2
J 8 7
K 9 6 5 4
K 10 3
10 4

EW 6N; E 6; EW 6; EW 5; W 5; EW 3; Par −1440

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW66906.930.077-Robinson-Kelley vs 1-Noga-Hempel
6 NTW614402.934.071-Rogers-Rogers vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
6 NTW614402.934.072-Newel-Newel vs 2-Coit-Miller
6 NTW614402.934.076-Layne-Macaulay vs 10-Myers-Myers
6 NTW614402.934.078-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 3-Winton-Daniels
6 NTW614402.934.079-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 5-Huston-Holley
6 NTW614402.934.0711-Sadler-Blanchard vs 9-High-Wiedel

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
10 6 5
J
J 8 4
K Q 10 9 3 2
Q 9 3
Q 9 3 2
K Q 10
8 7 4
N
WE
S
J 8 7 4 2
A K 8 5
9 6 2
J
A K
10 7 6 4
A 7 5 3
A 6 5

NS 3N; NS 4; EW 2; NS 2; EW 1; Par +300: EW 4×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 N41305.791.211-Rogers-Rogers vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
3 S41305.791.218-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 3-Winton-Daniels
3 N41305.791.2111-Sadler-Blanchard vs 9-High-Wiedel
1 NTS21203.503.509-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 5-Huston-Holley
4 E−1502.364.647-Robinson-Kelley vs 1-Noga-Hempel
2 E21101.215.796-Layne-Macaulay vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 N−33000.076.932-Newel-Newel vs 2-Coit-Miller

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
7 5 4
A 8 6 2
6 2
A J 7 6
J 10 9
7
Q 9 8 5 3
K 10 3 2
N
WE
S
8 3
K 9 4 3
A K J 7 4
8 5
A K Q 6 2
Q J 10 5
10
Q 9 4

NS 5; NS 4; NS 2N; NS 3; EW 2; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S44206.930.0711-Sadler-Blanchard vs 9-High-Wiedel
3 S41705.211.796-Layne-Macaulay vs 10-Myers-Myers
2 S41705.211.799-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 5-Huston-Holley
2 S21103.503.508-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 3-Winton-Daniels
4 S−1501.215.791-Rogers-Rogers vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
4 S−1501.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 2-Coit-Miller
4 S−1501.215.797-Robinson-Kelley vs 1-Noga-Hempel

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
9 5 3
9 2
Q 5 3
A 10 8 5 4
10 8 7 4
K Q 10 8 6
4 2
K 7
N
WE
S
Q J 2
4
K J 10 9 7
Q J 9 2
A K 6
A J 7 5 3
A 8 6
6 3

EW 2; EW 1N; EW 1; E 1; N 1; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTN1906.930.079-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 4-Pash-Cohen
1 S1805.791.217-Robinson-Kelley vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
2 NTN−11003.503.503-Waller-Johnson vs 3-Winton-Daniels
1 NTN−11003.503.508-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 2-Coit-Miller
2 NTN−11003.503.5011-Sadler-Blanchard vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
2 W21101.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 1-Noga-Hempel
2 NTS−33000.076.931-Rogers-Rogers vs 10-Myers-Myers

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
5
K J
A Q 5 3 2
K 10 9 8 2
2
7 5 3 2
K 10 9 6
A 7 4 3
N
WE
S
Q 10 9 3
10 9 6 4
J 8 7
Q 5
A K J 8 7 6 4
A Q 8
4
J 6

NS 5N; NS 5; NS 5; N 4; NS 2; S 3; Par +460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN54606.930.078-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 2-Coit-Miller
4 S44205.211.792-Newel-Newel vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 S44205.211.793-Waller-Johnson vs 3-Winton-Daniels
3 S41703.503.507-Robinson-Kelley vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
6 S−21002.364.649-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 NTS−31501.215.791-Rogers-Rogers vs 10-Myers-Myers
7 ×S−35000.076.9311-Sadler-Blanchard vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
J 3
Q J 8 5 3
6 5 3
A Q 7
A K 9 2
9 7 6 2
Q 8 7
8 5
N
WE
S
10 6
K
A K J 10 9 4
K 10 6 2
Q 8 7 5 4
A 10 4
2
J 9 4 3

EW 5; NS 2; EW 1N; NS 1; NS 1; Par −500: NS 5×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S44206.930.071-Rogers-Rogers vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 N31405.791.212-Newel-Newel vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 E−11004.642.3611-Sadler-Blanchard vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
4 N−1503.503.508-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 2-Coit-Miller
1 E2902.364.649-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 E31101.215.793-Waller-Johnson vs 3-Winton-Daniels
3 E41300.076.937-Robinson-Kelley vs 11-Petersen-Tingey

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
A J 3
A Q 10 6
A K 10
J 10 6
K 8 5 2
9 7 3
Q 7 4
9 5 4
N
WE
S
Q 10 9 6
J 5 4 2
J 5 2
A 2
7 4
K 8
9 8 6 3
K Q 8 7 3

N 5N; N 5; S 3N; NS 5; S 3; NS 4; N 2; S 1; Par +660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN66906.930.074-Clark-Berry vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 NTN56605.211.792-Newel-Newel vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
3 NTS56605.211.799-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 3-Winton-Daniels
3 NTN46303.503.508-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 NTN36001.795.213-Waller-Johnson vs 2-Coit-Miller
5 N56001.795.2111-Sadler-Blanchard vs 7-Schubert-Levy
5 N−11000.076.931-Rogers-Rogers vs 9-High-Wiedel

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
8 2
J 7
A 8 5 4 3
Q J 7 5
6 5 3
A 9
K Q J 6 2
9 4 2
N
WE
S
A K J 7 4
Q 10 5 4 3 2
A 10
Q 10 9
K 8 6
10 9 7
K 8 6 3

EW 4; EW 4; EW 2N; EW 1; EW 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E−1506.360.641-Rogers-Rogers vs 9-High-Wiedel
4 E−1506.360.643-Waller-Johnson vs 2-Coit-Miller
2 W21104.642.3611-Sadler-Blanchard vs 7-Schubert-Levy
2 E31403.503.509-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 3-Winton-Daniels
2 E41702.364.644-Clark-Berry vs 4-Pash-Cohen
4 E44201.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
4 E54500.076.938-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 1-Noga-Hempel

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
6 4 3
K J 8 5 2
J 9 2
K Q
9
9 7 6 3
A 6 4
A 10 8 7 4
N
WE
S
A Q J 10 7 2
Q
K 10 5
J 9 6
K 8 5
A 10 4
Q 8 7 3
5 3 2

EW 5; EW 3; EW 1N; EW 1; Par −400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N−11006.930.072-Newel-Newel vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
2 E21105.211.793-Waller-Johnson vs 2-Coit-Miller
2 E21105.211.794-Clark-Berry vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 E31401.795.211-Rogers-Rogers vs 9-High-Wiedel
2 W31401.795.218-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 1-Noga-Hempel
2 E31401.795.219-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 3-Winton-Daniels
2 E31401.795.2111-Sadler-Blanchard vs 7-Schubert-Levy

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
A J 4 3
9 7
K Q 10 8 4
10 8
K
A K 10 6 5 2
J 2
A 9 6 5
N
WE
S
Q 8 7 5 2
J 8 4
7 6 5
J 7
10 9 6
Q 3
A 9 3
K Q 4 3 2

EW 3; NS 3; EW 1N; NS 1; NS 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 N41306.930.074-Clark-Berry vs 3-Winton-Daniels
3 N31105.791.213-Waller-Johnson vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 N−11004.642.3611-Sadler-Blanchard vs 6-Miller-Gullo
1 W31402.364.641-Rogers-Rogers vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
2 W31402.364.642-Newel-Newel vs 10-Myers-Myers
2 W31402.364.645-Creede-Laquerriere vs 5-Huston-Holley
2 N−22000.076.939-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 2-Coit-Miller

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
J 9 2
A Q 9 3
K 8 6 5
10 3
A K 10 3
K 10 5
9 4
Q 7 6 2
N
WE
S
Q 7 5
J 8 7 6 4 2
A Q 10
9
8 6 4
J 7 3 2
A K J 8 5 4

EW 4; EW 2; EW 1N; NS 1; E 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 W−1506.930.071-Rogers-Rogers vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 E31404.642.362-Newel-Newel vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 E31404.642.364-Clark-Berry vs 3-Winton-Daniels
2 E31404.642.3611-Sadler-Blanchard vs 6-Miller-Gullo
3 S−31501.795.213-Waller-Johnson vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 S−31501.795.215-Creede-Laquerriere vs 5-Huston-Holley
2 E41700.076.939-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 2-Coit-Miller

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
10 5 2
K 7 3
10 4 3
J 9 8 3
J 9 8
A J 10 8 5
K 9 5 2
Q
N
WE
S
A Q 6 3
6 2
J 8
A K 10 6 5
K 7 4
Q 9 4
A Q 7 6
7 4 2

EW 4; EW 3N; EW 3; EW 3; EW 3; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−1506.930.075-Creede-Laquerriere vs 5-Huston-Holley
2 NTE31505.791.2111-Sadler-Blanchard vs 6-Miller-Gullo
3 NTW34003.503.501-Rogers-Rogers vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 NTE34003.503.503-Waller-Johnson vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 NTE34003.503.509-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 2-Coit-Miller
3 NTE44301.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 NTW54600.076.934-Clark-Berry vs 3-Winton-Daniels

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
J 9 6
Q
8 7 5 2
K Q 9 8 6
K 7
10 7 2
A K Q J 4
A 10 3
N
WE
S
A 8 5 4
J 9 8
10 9
J 7 5 2
Q 10 3 2
A K 6 5 4 3
6 3
4

EW 2N; EW 3; EW 2; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 E−44006.930.074-Clark-Berry vs 2-Coit-Miller
3 S41705.791.215-Creede-Laquerriere vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 S21104.642.363-Waller-Johnson vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
3 W−11003.503.501-Rogers-Rogers vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 W31102.364.642-Newel-Newel vs 9-High-Wiedel
1 NTW31500.646.366-Layne-Macaulay vs 6-Miller-Gullo
1 NTW31500.646.3611-Sadler-Blanchard vs 5-Huston-Holley

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
A Q 6 2
A 10 6 4
Q 9 6 4 2
10 9 8
9 7 5 2
K J 5
Q J 3
N
WE
S
K 4
K Q 8
A 8
8 7 6 5 4 2
J 7 5 3
J 3
10 7 3
A K 10 9

NS 3; N 2N; NS 3; S 1N; NS 1; EW 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S31406.930.074-Clark-Berry vs 2-Coit-Miller
1 W−1505.791.2111-Sadler-Blanchard vs 5-Huston-Holley
3 S−1502.934.071-Rogers-Rogers vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 N−1502.934.073-Waller-Johnson vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
4 S−1502.934.075-Creede-Laquerriere vs 4-Pash-Cohen
1 NTS−1502.934.076-Layne-Macaulay vs 6-Miller-Gullo
2 E2900.076.932-Newel-Newel vs 9-High-Wiedel

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
10 6 4 3
6 4
9 4
K J 10 5 3
9 8
K 8 7
A 5 2
Q 9 8 7 2
N
WE
S
A K Q 5 2
A Q 3
K 10 8 7
4
J 7
J 10 9 5 2
Q J 6 3
A 6

EW 4; EW 3N; EW 3; EW 4; EW 2; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 E21106.830.175-Creede-Laquerriere vs 4-Pash-Cohen
1 NTE41805.501.506-Layne-Macaulay vs 6-Miller-Gullo
NPAVE+AVE-4.202.801-Rogers-Rogers vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 NTW34004.172.834-Clark-Berry vs 2-Coit-Miller
3 NTW44301.505.502-Newel-Newel vs 9-High-Wiedel
3 NTW44301.505.503-Waller-Johnson vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
3 NTW44301.505.5011-Sadler-Blanchard vs 5-Huston-Holley

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
A 8 4
J 7 6
5
Q 9 6 5 4 3
K Q 7 6 5
K 10 9 5
6
J 7 2
N
WE
S
J 3 2
A Q 3
K 10 8 7
A 10 8
10 9
8 4 2
A Q J 9 4 3 2
K

EW 4; EW 3N; EW 3; NS 1; EW 1; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S2907.000.0011-Sadler-Blanchard vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 S−21005.002.001-Rogers-Rogers vs 6-Miller-Gullo
3 S−21005.002.003-Waller-Johnson vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 S−21005.002.004-Clark-Berry vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 S−31502.504.502-Newel-Newel vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 S−31502.504.506-Layne-Macaulay vs 5-Huston-Holley
4 S−42001.006.007-Robinson-Kelley vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 NTE36000.007.005-Creede-Laquerriere vs 3-Winton-Daniels

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
A 6
6 5 4
9 8 5 3
A K 9 8
K J 7 5 4
J 7 2
Q 10 7 4
10
N
WE
S
Q 9 8 3 2
K Q 9 8 3
K 2
7
10
A 10
A J 6
Q J 6 5 4 3 2

NS 4N; EW 3; NS 4; EW 2; NS 2; Par +500: EW 5×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 S51506.500.507-Robinson-Kelley vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 S51506.500.5011-Sadler-Blanchard vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 S41305.002.005-Creede-Laquerriere vs 3-Winton-Daniels
4 E−11004.003.001-Rogers-Rogers vs 6-Miller-Gullo
5 S−11003.004.003-Waller-Johnson vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 W31401.505.502-Newel-Newel vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
2 E31401.505.504-Clark-Berry vs 1-Noga-Hempel
5 ×S−12000.007.006-Layne-Macaulay vs 5-Huston-Holley

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
8 6 5 3
A 9 8 5
10
A 8 7 3
K 7 4 2
J 7
Q 3
K J 10 9 5
N
WE
S
A J 10
K
A K J 8 7 4
6 4 2
Q 9
Q 10 6 4 3 2
9 6 5 2
Q

EW 5; NS 3; EW 2; EW 3; Par −400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W−31507.000.003-Waller-Johnson vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 W−21005.501.502-Newel-Newel vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
4 E−21005.501.505-Creede-Laquerriere vs 3-Winton-Daniels
2 W21103.503.506-Layne-Macaulay vs 5-Huston-Holley
3 E31103.503.5011-Sadler-Blanchard vs 4-Pash-Cohen
4 E41302.005.007-Robinson-Kelley vs 7-Schubert-Levy
2 E51501.006.004-Clark-Berry vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 NTW44300.007.001-Rogers-Rogers vs 6-Miller-Gullo

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
K 5
J 9 5
Q J 10 2
A 6 5 4
6 3
A K 8
8 5
K Q J 9 8 2
N
WE
S
A J 9 4
6 3 2
A K 7 6 4
7
Q 10 8 7 2
Q 10 7 4
9 3
10 3

EW 4N; EW 4; EW 3; EW 1; EW 1; Par −630

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−11007.000.004-Clark-Berry vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
3 W41306.001.002-Newel-Newel vs 7-Schubert-Levy
2 NTE41804.502.505-Creede-Laquerriere vs 2-Coit-Miller
2 NTW41804.502.506-Layne-Macaulay vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 NTW46302.005.001-Rogers-Rogers vs 5-Huston-Holley
3 NTE46302.005.003-Waller-Johnson vs 9-High-Wiedel
3 NTW46302.005.007-Robinson-Kelley vs 6-Miller-Gullo
3 NTW56600.007.008-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
9 8 4 2
K J 10 5 2
K J 7
J
7 5
6 3
Q 10 6 4 3
10 8 4 2
N
WE
S
A K J 10 6
8 4
A 9 8
6 5 3
Q 3
A Q 9 7
5 2
A K Q 9 7

NS 4; NS 3; NS 1N; N 1; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S56506.001.006-Layne-Macaulay vs 4-Pash-Cohen
4 N56506.001.007-Robinson-Kelley vs 6-Miller-Gullo
4 S56506.001.008-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
4 N46202.504.501-Rogers-Rogers vs 5-Huston-Holley
4 N46202.504.502-Newel-Newel vs 7-Schubert-Levy
4 S46202.504.504-Clark-Berry vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
4 S46202.504.505-Creede-Laquerriere vs 2-Coit-Miller
3 N52000.007.003-Waller-Johnson vs 9-High-Wiedel

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
K 8
8 5 4 3 2
10 9 5
A 10 3
Q 7 6 5 2
K Q 9 6
J 6
Q J
N
WE
S
10 9 3
A J
K 8 7 4
9 8 6 4
A J 4
10 7
A Q 3 2
K 7 5 2

S 3; NS 2N; N 2; NS 2; NS 2; S 1; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS31506.500.506-Layne-Macaulay vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 W−31506.500.508-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
2 NTS21204.502.501-Rogers-Rogers vs 5-Huston-Holley
1 NTS21204.502.502-Newel-Newel vs 7-Schubert-Levy
2 W−1502.504.504-Clark-Berry vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
2 W−1502.504.507-Robinson-Kelley vs 6-Miller-Gullo
1 W1801.006.005-Creede-Laquerriere vs 2-Coit-Miller
2 W21100.007.003-Waller-Johnson vs 9-High-Wiedel

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
Q 3
6 4 3 2
K 6 4 2
K J 5
K 8
A K Q J 10 9 8 7
5 3
8
N
WE
S
9 7 5
5
10 9 8
A 10 6 4 3 2
A J 10 6 4 2
A Q J 7
Q 9 7

NS 5; EW 4; NS 4; EW 1N; NS 2; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 S54507.000.008-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 7-Schubert-Levy
4 S44206.001.009-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 9-High-Wiedel
5 ×W−12005.002.003-Waller-Johnson vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
5 W−11004.003.002-Newel-Newel vs 6-Miller-Gullo
5 S−1502.504.504-Clark-Berry vs 10-Myers-Myers
4 S−1502.504.507-Robinson-Kelley vs 5-Huston-Holley
4 W46200.506.505-Creede-Laquerriere vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 W46200.506.506-Layne-Macaulay vs 3-Winton-Daniels

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
J 9 4
K J 4
K 10 9 5
A 8 2
A 10 5
A 9 5 3
Q 7 6 4 3
7
N
WE
S
Q 8 7 6 3 2
7 6
A J
10 6 5
K
Q 10 8 2
8 2
K Q J 9 4 3

EW 3; NS 3; NS 1N; NS 1; EW 1; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN36007.000.003-Waller-Johnson vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 W−22006.001.009-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 9-High-Wiedel
2 S41705.002.005-Creede-Laquerriere vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 S31103.503.507-Robinson-Kelley vs 5-Huston-Holley
3 S31103.503.508-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 7-Schubert-Levy
4 S−11002.005.006-Layne-Macaulay vs 3-Winton-Daniels
3 NTN−22000.506.502-Newel-Newel vs 6-Miller-Gullo
2 E52000.506.504-Clark-Berry vs 10-Myers-Myers

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
J 8 4
A Q 6
3 2
9 8 6 5 3
A 10 3
10 3
K Q 10
A J 10 7 4
N
WE
S
Q 5
K 8 5 4
A 8 7 6 5
K 2
K 9 7 6 2
J 9 7 2
J 9 4
Q

EW 5N; EW 5; EW 3; EW 4; EW 1; Par −460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 E41307.000.005-Creede-Laquerriere vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 E61706.001.003-Waller-Johnson vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
5 E64204.502.504-Clark-Berry vs 10-Myers-Myers
5 E64204.502.508-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 NTW44303.004.006-Layne-Macaulay vs 3-Winton-Daniels
3 NTW54601.505.502-Newel-Newel vs 6-Miller-Gullo
3 NTW54601.505.509-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 9-High-Wiedel
3 NTW75200.007.007-Robinson-Kelley vs 5-Huston-Holley

Board 28
West Deals
N-S Vul
7 6 5 2
Q 6 2
10 9 8 4
K 8
Q 9 8
J 9 8 5
A K Q
A J 5
N
WE
S
A J 10 4 3
3
J 7 2
10 6 4 2
K
A K 10 7 4
6 5 3
Q 9 7 3

EW 4; EW 3N; EW 3; EW 2; NS 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 W21105.791.214-Clark-Berry vs 9-High-Wiedel
2 W21105.791.215-Creede-Laquerriere vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
3 E31105.791.219-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
2 W31402.364.643-Waller-Johnson vs 7-Schubert-Levy
2 W31402.364.646-Layne-Macaulay vs 2-Coit-Miller
2 W31402.364.648-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 6-Miller-Gullo
4 ×S−38000.076.937-Robinson-Kelley vs 4-Pash-Cohen

Board 29
North Deals
Both Vul
Q 2
J 8 5
K J 8 2
A K 8 3
K J 3
6 4 2
A Q 9 6 5 4
2
N
WE
S
A 8 7
10 9 7
10 7 3
Q J 6 4
10 9 6 5 4
A K Q 3
10 9 7 5

NS 3; NS 3; NS 3; NS 1N; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTN41806.360.645-Creede-Laquerriere vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
1 NTN41806.360.649-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
2 NTN21203.503.503-Waller-Johnson vs 7-Schubert-Levy
2 NTN21203.503.504-Clark-Berry vs 9-High-Wiedel
2 NTN21203.503.507-Robinson-Kelley vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 N21101.215.796-Layne-Macaulay vs 2-Coit-Miller
3 NTN−22000.076.938-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 6-Miller-Gullo

Board 30
East Deals
None Vul
K Q 9 7
K
K 10 8 5 3
4 3 2
10 6 4
10 9 4 3
A 9 2
Q J 5
N
WE
S
J 8 5 3
A 7 5
Q J 6 4
8 6
A 2
Q J 8 6 2
7
A K 10 9 7

N 3N; NS 3; NS 3; NS 4; S 2N; NS 3; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN34006.360.645-Creede-Laquerriere vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
3 NTN34006.360.647-Robinson-Kelley vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 NTN31504.642.363-Waller-Johnson vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 NTN−1502.364.644-Clark-Berry vs 9-High-Wiedel
3 NTN−1502.364.646-Layne-Macaulay vs 2-Coit-Miller
3 NTS−1502.364.649-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 NTN−21000.076.938-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 6-Miller-Gullo

Board 31
South Deals
N-S Vul
9 2
K Q 7 5 2
Q 10 7 2
5 3
A Q 10 7 6
A 10 9 4
3
A 7 4
N
WE
S
3
J 8 6 3
A 9 5
K J 10 9 6
K J 8 5 4
K J 8 6 4
Q 8 2

EW 4; EW 3N; EW 5; EW 2; NS 1; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ×E−11006.930.077-Robinson-Kelley vs 3-Winton-Daniels
5 W−1505.791.219-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 S−22004.642.366-Layne-Macaulay vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 S−33002.934.078-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 5-Huston-Holley
4 S−33002.934.0711-Sadler-Blanchard vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
3 NTW34001.215.795-Creede-Laquerriere vs 10-Myers-Myers
4 W44200.076.934-Clark-Berry vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades

Board 32
West Deals
E-W Vul
A K Q 9 4 3 2
A 10 4
2
5 2
J 10
8
J 10 8 7 3
A K Q 7 6
N
WE
S
6 5
7 5 2
A Q 6 5
J 10 8 3
8 7
K Q J 9 6 3
K 9 4
9 4

NS 4; NS 4; EW 3; EW 3; NS 1N; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N75106.360.646-Layne-Macaulay vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 N75106.360.647-Robinson-Kelley vs 3-Winton-Daniels
4 N54504.642.368-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 5-Huston-Holley
4 N44203.503.509-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 NTS−1502.364.6411-Sadler-Blanchard vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
5 ×N−11000.646.364-Clark-Berry vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
6 N−21000.646.365-Creede-Laquerriere vs 10-Myers-Myers

Board 33
North Deals
None Vul
A K J 10 6
A 5 3 2
J 10 4
K
8 7 4
10 9 4
A 6 5
10 7 6 3
N
WE
S
Q 5 3
Q J 8 6
9 7 3
J 9 4
9 2
K 7
K Q 8 2
A Q 8 5 2

NS 6; NS 5; NS 4N; NS 4; NS 5; Par +920

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS54605.211.794-Clark-Berry vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 NTS54605.211.796-Layne-Macaulay vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 NTN54605.211.798-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 5-Huston-Holley
3 NTS54605.211.799-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 NTN44302.364.645-Creede-Laquerriere vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 NTN34001.215.7911-Sadler-Blanchard vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
6 NTN−21000.076.937-Robinson-Kelley vs 3-Winton-Daniels