750 Thursday Aft Session May 7, 2015
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  B  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  5   54.76   92.00  B   1     1          1.03(A)  Patricia Creede - Renee Laquerriere
 11   53.70   90.22  C   2     2     1    0.72(A)  Ann Sadler - Karin Blanchard
  3   52.93   88.93  A   3                0.52(A)  Martha Waller - Virginia Johnson
  4   52.82   88.74  A   4                0.36(A)  Mary Ann Clark - Gay Berry
  8   50.13   84.22  A                             John Oakshott - Peggy Oakshott
  6   50.08   84.14  A                             Lois Layne - Ted Macaulay
  7   49.45   83.08  B                             Marlene Robinson - Barbara Kelley
  9   48.05   80.72  A                             Angelina Heisdorf - Sue Gearhart
  1   46.60   78.28  C                             Bill Rogers - Chris Rogers
  2   41.91   70.41  B                             Jeremy Newel - Michael Newel
750 Thursday Aft Session May 7, 2015
Scores after  8 rounds  Average:   84.0      Section  B  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  6   64.00  107.52  A   1                1.03(A)  Carol Miller - Mary Gullo
 10   56.38   94.72  C   2     1     1    0.76(B)  Don Myers - Doris Myers
  5   56.17   94.37  A   3                0.52(A)  Pat Huston - Nancy Holley
  9   54.70   91.89  B   4     2          0.53(B)  Lois High - Barbara Wiedel
  2   51.77   86.97  B         3          0.38(B)  William Coit - Larry Miller
  3   49.90   83.84  A                             Don Winton - Beverly Daniels
  1   48.89   82.14  C               2    0.39(C)  Jerry F. Noga - John Hempel
  7   44.66   75.03  C                             Nancy Schubert - Carol Levy
  8   44.61   74.94  C                             Anna Harguindeguy - Helen Smades
 11   44.17   74.20  B                             Deb Petersen - Cynthia Tingey
  4   34.99   58.79  C                             Betty Pash - Joanne Cohen

Board 1
North Deals
None Vul
♠K
♥A 10 7 6 5 4 3
♦7 5
♣A 9 3
♠8 7 6 5
♥9
♦A 6 4 2
♣Q 7 6 5
N
WE
S
♠A 9 3 2
♥Q J 8
♦J 10 3
♣K 4 2
♠Q J 10 4
♥K 2
♦K Q 9 8
♣J 10 8

NS 3N; NS 3♥; NS 2♠; NS 3♦; NS 2♣; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥N44205.791.211-Rogers-Rogers vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 ♥N44205.791.216-Layne-Macaulay vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
4 ♥N44205.791.218-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 ♥N41703.503.505-Creede-Laquerriere vs 9-High-Wiedel
3 ♥N31402.364.647-Robinson-Kelley vs 2-Coit-Miller
4 ♥N−1501.215.7911-Sadler-Blanchard vs 10-Myers-Myers
5 ♥N−21000.076.939-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 6-Miller-Gullo

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠5 3 2
♥A K 9 5 3
♦9 8 3
♣K 8
♠Q 8 7
♥6 4 2
♦2
♣A 7 6 5 3 2
N
WE
S
♠K J 9
♥10 8
♦J 10 7 5 4
♣J 9 4
♠A 10 6 4
♥Q J 7
♦A K Q 6
♣Q 10

NS 4N; NS 4♠; NS 4♥; NS 3♦; EW 2♣; Par +500: EW 5♣×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS56606.930.077-Robinson-Kelley vs 2-Coit-Miller
3 NTN46305.791.215-Creede-Laquerriere vs 9-High-Wiedel
4 ♥N46203.503.506-Layne-Macaulay vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
4 ♥S46203.503.508-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 4-Pash-Cohen
4 ♥S46203.503.5011-Sadler-Blanchard vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 NTN36001.215.791-Rogers-Rogers vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 ♥N41700.076.939-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 6-Miller-Gullo

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠J 6 3
♥9 7
♦J 9 2
♣K 7 5 4 2
♠7 5 4
♥K 8
♦10 6 5 4
♣10 9 8 6
N
WE
S
♠Q 10 9 2
♥Q 10 4 3
♦A 3
♣A Q 3
♠A K 8
♥A J 6 5 2
♦K Q 8 7
♣J

NS 2♥; NS 1N; NS 2♦; NS 1♠; N 1♣; Par +110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♥S31406.930.0711-Sadler-Blanchard vs 10-Myers-Myers
2 ♣W−11005.791.216-Layne-Macaulay vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
2 ♦S2904.642.367-Robinson-Kelley vs 2-Coit-Miller
3 ♦S−1503.503.501-Rogers-Rogers vs 1-Noga-Hempel
2 ♣W2902.364.645-Creede-Laquerriere vs 9-High-Wiedel
4 ♥S−21000.646.368-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 NTN−21000.646.369-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 6-Miller-Gullo

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul
♠10 6 5 4 2
♥8 7
♦J 7 2
♣9 8 7
♠Q 9 3
♥J 10 2
♦A Q 6 5
♣A K 5
N
WE
S
♠A K
♥A Q 3
♦9 8 4
♣Q J 6 3 2
♠J 8 7
♥K 9 6 5 4
♦K 10 3
♣10 4

EW 6N; E 6♦; EW 6♣; EW 5♥; W 5♦; EW 3♠; Par −1440

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW66906.930.077-Robinson-Kelley vs 1-Noga-Hempel
6 NTW614402.934.071-Rogers-Rogers vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
6 NTW614402.934.072-Newel-Newel vs 2-Coit-Miller
6 NTW614402.934.076-Layne-Macaulay vs 10-Myers-Myers
6 NTW614402.934.078-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 3-Winton-Daniels
6 NTW614402.934.079-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 5-Huston-Holley
6 NTW614402.934.0711-Sadler-Blanchard vs 9-High-Wiedel

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠10 6 5
♥J
♦J 8 4
♣K Q 10 9 3 2
♠Q 9 3
♥Q 9 3 2
♦K Q 10
♣8 7 4
N
WE
S
♠J 8 7 4 2
♥A K 8 5
♦9 6 2
♣J
♠A K
♥10 7 6 4
♦A 7 5 3
♣A 6 5

NS 3N; NS 4♣; EW 2♥; NS 2♦; EW 1♠; Par +300: EW 4♥×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♣N41305.791.211-Rogers-Rogers vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
3 ♣S41305.791.218-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 3-Winton-Daniels
3 ♣N41305.791.2111-Sadler-Blanchard vs 9-High-Wiedel
1 NTS21203.503.509-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 5-Huston-Holley
4 ♠E−1502.364.647-Robinson-Kelley vs 1-Noga-Hempel
2 ♠E21101.215.796-Layne-Macaulay vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 ♠N−33000.076.932-Newel-Newel vs 2-Coit-Miller

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠7 5 4
♥A 8 6 2
♦6 2
♣A J 7 6
♠J 10 9
♥7
♦Q 9 8 5 3
♣K 10 3 2
N
WE
S
♠8 3
♥K 9 4 3
♦A K J 7 4
♣8 5
♠A K Q 6 2
♥Q J 10 5
♦10
♣Q 9 4

NS 5♠; NS 4♥; NS 2N; NS 3♣; EW 2♦; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠S44206.930.0711-Sadler-Blanchard vs 9-High-Wiedel
3 ♠S41705.211.796-Layne-Macaulay vs 10-Myers-Myers
2 ♠S41705.211.799-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 5-Huston-Holley
2 ♠S21103.503.508-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 3-Winton-Daniels
4 ♠S−1501.215.791-Rogers-Rogers vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
4 ♠S−1501.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 2-Coit-Miller
4 ♠S−1501.215.797-Robinson-Kelley vs 1-Noga-Hempel

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul
♠9 5 3
♥9 2
♦Q 5 3
♣A 10 8 5 4
♠10 8 7 4
♥K Q 10 8 6
♦4 2
♣K 7
N
WE
S
♠Q J 2
♥4
♦K J 10 9 7
♣Q J 9 2
♠A K 6
♥A J 7 5 3
♦A 8 6
♣6 3

EW 2♠; EW 1N; EW 1♥; E 1♦; N 1♣; Par −110

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTN1906.930.079-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 4-Pash-Cohen
1 ♥S1805.791.217-Robinson-Kelley vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
2 NTN−11003.503.503-Waller-Johnson vs 3-Winton-Daniels
1 NTN−11003.503.508-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 2-Coit-Miller
2 NTN−11003.503.5011-Sadler-Blanchard vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
2 ♠W21101.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 1-Noga-Hempel
2 NTS−33000.076.931-Rogers-Rogers vs 10-Myers-Myers

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul
♠5
♥K J
♦A Q 5 3 2
♣K 10 9 8 2
♠2
♥7 5 3 2
♦K 10 9 6
♣A 7 4 3
N
WE
S
♠Q 10 9 3
♥10 9 6 4
♦J 8 7
♣Q 5
♠A K J 8 7 6 4
♥A Q 8
♦4
♣J 6

NS 5N; NS 5♠; NS 5♣; N 4♦; NS 2♥; S 3♦; Par +460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN54606.930.078-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 2-Coit-Miller
4 ♠S44205.211.792-Newel-Newel vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 ♠S44205.211.793-Waller-Johnson vs 3-Winton-Daniels
3 ♠S41703.503.507-Robinson-Kelley vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
6 ♠S−21002.364.649-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 NTS−31501.215.791-Rogers-Rogers vs 10-Myers-Myers
7 ♠×S−35000.076.9311-Sadler-Blanchard vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠J 3
♥Q J 8 5 3
♦6 5 3
♣A Q 7
♠A K 9 2
♥9 7 6 2
♦Q 8 7
♣8 5
N
WE
S
♠10 6
♥K
♦A K J 10 9 4
♣K 10 6 2
♠Q 8 7 5 4
♥A 10 4
♦2
♣J 9 4 3

EW 5♦; NS 2♥; EW 1N; NS 1♠; NS 1♣; Par −500: NS 5♥×−3

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠S44206.930.071-Rogers-Rogers vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 ♥N31405.791.212-Newel-Newel vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 ♦E−11004.642.3611-Sadler-Blanchard vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
4 ♥N−1503.503.508-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 2-Coit-Miller
1 ♦E2902.364.649-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 ♦E31101.215.793-Waller-Johnson vs 3-Winton-Daniels
3 ♦E41300.076.937-Robinson-Kelley vs 11-Petersen-Tingey

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul
♠A J 3
♥A Q 10 6
♦A K 10
♣J 10 6
♠K 8 5 2
♥9 7 3
♦Q 7 4
♣9 5 4
N
WE
S
♠Q 10 9 6
♥J 5 4 2
♦J 5 2
♣A 2
♠7 4
♥K 8
♦9 8 6 3
♣K Q 8 7 3

N 5N; N 5♥; S 3N; NS 5♣; S 3♥; NS 4♦; N 2♠; S 1♠; Par +660

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN66906.930.074-Clark-Berry vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 NTN56605.211.792-Newel-Newel vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
3 NTS56605.211.799-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 3-Winton-Daniels
3 NTN46303.503.508-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 NTN36001.795.213-Waller-Johnson vs 2-Coit-Miller
5 ♣N56001.795.2111-Sadler-Blanchard vs 7-Schubert-Levy
5 ♣N−11000.076.931-Rogers-Rogers vs 9-High-Wiedel

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul
♠8 2
♥J 7
♦A 8 5 4 3
♣Q J 7 5
♠6 5 3
♥A 9
♦K Q J 6 2
♣9 4 2
N
WE
S
♠A K J 7 4
♥Q 10 5 4 3 2
♦—
♣A 10
♠Q 10 9
♥K 8 6
♦10 9 7
♣K 8 6 3

EW 4♠; EW 4♥; EW 2N; EW 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥E−1506.360.641-Rogers-Rogers vs 9-High-Wiedel
4 ♥E−1506.360.643-Waller-Johnson vs 2-Coit-Miller
2 ♠W21104.642.3611-Sadler-Blanchard vs 7-Schubert-Levy
2 ♠E31403.503.509-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 3-Winton-Daniels
2 ♠E41702.364.644-Clark-Berry vs 4-Pash-Cohen
4 ♠E44201.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
4 ♠E54500.076.938-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 1-Noga-Hempel

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul
♠6 4 3
♥K J 8 5 2
♦J 9 2
♣K Q
♠9
♥9 7 6 3
♦A 6 4
♣A 10 8 7 4
N
WE
S
♠A Q J 10 7 2
♥Q
♦K 10 5
♣J 9 6
♠K 8 5
♥A 10 4
♦Q 8 7 3
♣5 3 2

EW 5♣; EW 3♠; EW 1N; EW 1♦; Par −400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♥N−11006.930.072-Newel-Newel vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
2 ♠E21105.211.793-Waller-Johnson vs 2-Coit-Miller
2 ♠E21105.211.794-Clark-Berry vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 ♠E31401.795.211-Rogers-Rogers vs 9-High-Wiedel
2 ♠W31401.795.218-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 1-Noga-Hempel
2 ♠E31401.795.219-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 3-Winton-Daniels
2 ♠E31401.795.2111-Sadler-Blanchard vs 7-Schubert-Levy

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul
♠A J 4 3
♥9 7
♦K Q 10 8 4
♣10 8
♠K
♥A K 10 6 5 2
♦J 2
♣A 9 6 5
N
WE
S
♠Q 8 7 5 2
♥J 8 4
♦7 6 5
♣J 7
♠10 9 6
♥Q 3
♦A 9 3
♣K Q 4 3 2

EW 3♥; NS 3♦; EW 1N; NS 1♠; NS 1♣; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♦N41306.930.074-Clark-Berry vs 3-Winton-Daniels
3 ♦N31105.791.213-Waller-Johnson vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 ♦N−11004.642.3611-Sadler-Blanchard vs 6-Miller-Gullo
1 ♥W31402.364.641-Rogers-Rogers vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
2 ♥W31402.364.642-Newel-Newel vs 10-Myers-Myers
2 ♥W31402.364.645-Creede-Laquerriere vs 5-Huston-Holley
2 ♠N−22000.076.939-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 2-Coit-Miller

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul
♠J 9 2
♥A Q 9 3
♦K 8 6 5
♣10 3
♠A K 10 3
♥K 10 5
♦9 4
♣Q 7 6 2
N
WE
S
♠Q 7 5
♥J 8 7 6 4 2
♦A Q 10
♣9
♠8 6 4
♥—
♦J 7 3 2
♣A K J 8 5 4

EW 4♥; EW 2♠; EW 1N; NS 1♦; E 1♣; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠W−1506.930.071-Rogers-Rogers vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 ♥E31404.642.362-Newel-Newel vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 ♥E31404.642.364-Clark-Berry vs 3-Winton-Daniels
2 ♥E31404.642.3611-Sadler-Blanchard vs 6-Miller-Gullo
3 ♣S−31501.795.213-Waller-Johnson vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 ♣S−31501.795.215-Creede-Laquerriere vs 5-Huston-Holley
2 ♥E41700.076.939-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 2-Coit-Miller

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul
♠10 5 2
♥K 7 3
♦10 4 3
♣J 9 8 3
♠J 9 8
♥A J 10 8 5
♦K 9 5 2
♣Q
N
WE
S
♠A Q 6 3
♥6 2
♦J 8
♣A K 10 6 5
♠K 7 4
♥Q 9 4
♦A Q 7 6
♣7 4 2

EW 4♠; EW 3N; EW 3♥; EW 3♦; EW 3♣; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−1506.930.075-Creede-Laquerriere vs 5-Huston-Holley
2 NTE31505.791.2111-Sadler-Blanchard vs 6-Miller-Gullo
3 NTW34003.503.501-Rogers-Rogers vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 NTE34003.503.503-Waller-Johnson vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 NTE34003.503.509-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 2-Coit-Miller
3 NTE44301.215.792-Newel-Newel vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 NTW54600.076.934-Clark-Berry vs 3-Winton-Daniels

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul
♠J 9 6
♥Q
♦8 7 5 2
♣K Q 9 8 6
♠K 7
♥10 7 2
♦A K Q J 4
♣A 10 3
N
WE
S
♠A 8 5 4
♥J 9 8
♦10 9
♣J 7 5 2
♠Q 10 3 2
♥A K 6 5 4 3
♦6 3
♣4

EW 2N; EW 3♦; EW 2♣; Par −120

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♣E−44006.930.074-Clark-Berry vs 2-Coit-Miller
3 ♥S41705.791.215-Creede-Laquerriere vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 ♥S21104.642.363-Waller-Johnson vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
3 ♦W−11003.503.501-Rogers-Rogers vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 ♦W31102.364.642-Newel-Newel vs 9-High-Wiedel
1 NTW31500.646.366-Layne-Macaulay vs 6-Miller-Gullo
1 NTW31500.646.3611-Sadler-Blanchard vs 5-Huston-Holley

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul
♠A Q 6 2
♥A 10 6 4
♦Q 9 6 4 2
♣—
♠10 9 8
♥9 7 5 2
♦K J 5
♣Q J 3
N
WE
S
♠K 4
♥K Q 8
♦A 8
♣8 7 6 5 4 2
♠J 7 5 3
♥J 3
♦10 7 3
♣A K 10 9

NS 3♠; N 2N; NS 3♦; S 1N; NS 1♥; EW 1♣; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠S31406.930.074-Clark-Berry vs 2-Coit-Miller
1 ♥W−1505.791.2111-Sadler-Blanchard vs 5-Huston-Holley
3 ♠S−1502.934.071-Rogers-Rogers vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 ♦N−1502.934.073-Waller-Johnson vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
4 ♠S−1502.934.075-Creede-Laquerriere vs 4-Pash-Cohen
1 NTS−1502.934.076-Layne-Macaulay vs 6-Miller-Gullo
2 ♣E2900.076.932-Newel-Newel vs 9-High-Wiedel

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul
♠10 6 4 3
♥6 4
♦9 4
♣K J 10 5 3
♠9 8
♥K 8 7
♦A 5 2
♣Q 9 8 7 2
N
WE
S
♠A K Q 5 2
♥A Q 3
♦K 10 8 7
♣4
♠J 7
♥J 10 9 5 2
♦Q J 6 3
♣A 6

EW 4♠; EW 3N; EW 3♥; EW 4♦; EW 2♣; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠E21106.830.175-Creede-Laquerriere vs 4-Pash-Cohen
1 NTE41805.501.506-Layne-Macaulay vs 6-Miller-Gullo
NPAVE+AVE-4.202.801-Rogers-Rogers vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 NTW34004.172.834-Clark-Berry vs 2-Coit-Miller
3 NTW44301.505.502-Newel-Newel vs 9-High-Wiedel
3 NTW44301.505.503-Waller-Johnson vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
3 NTW44301.505.5011-Sadler-Blanchard vs 5-Huston-Holley

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul
♠A 8 4
♥J 7 6
♦5
♣Q 9 6 5 4 3
♠K Q 7 6 5
♥K 10 9 5
♦6
♣J 7 2
N
WE
S
♠J 3 2
♥A Q 3
♦K 10 8 7
♣A 10 8
♠10 9
♥8 4 2
♦A Q J 9 4 3 2
♣K

EW 4♥; EW 3N; EW 3♠; NS 1♦; EW 1♣; Par −620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♦S2907.000.0011-Sadler-Blanchard vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 ♦S−21005.002.001-Rogers-Rogers vs 6-Miller-Gullo
3 ♦S−21005.002.003-Waller-Johnson vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 ♦S−21005.002.004-Clark-Berry vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 ♦S−31502.504.502-Newel-Newel vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 ♦S−31502.504.506-Layne-Macaulay vs 5-Huston-Holley
4 ♦S−42001.006.007-Robinson-Kelley vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 NTE36000.007.005-Creede-Laquerriere vs 3-Winton-Daniels

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul
♠A 6
♥6 5 4
♦9 8 5 3
♣A K 9 8
♠K J 7 5 4
♥J 7 2
♦Q 10 7 4
♣10
N
WE
S
♠Q 9 8 3 2
♥K Q 9 8 3
♦K 2
♣7
♠10
♥A 10
♦A J 6
♣Q J 6 5 4 3 2

NS 4N; EW 3♠; NS 4♣; EW 2♥; NS 2♦; Par +500: EW 5♠×−2

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♣S51506.500.507-Robinson-Kelley vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 ♣S51506.500.5011-Sadler-Blanchard vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 ♣S41305.002.005-Creede-Laquerriere vs 3-Winton-Daniels
4 ♠E−11004.003.001-Rogers-Rogers vs 6-Miller-Gullo
5 ♣S−11003.004.003-Waller-Johnson vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 ♠W31401.505.502-Newel-Newel vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
2 ♥E31401.505.504-Clark-Berry vs 1-Noga-Hempel
5 ♣×S−12000.007.006-Layne-Macaulay vs 5-Huston-Holley

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul
♠8 6 5 3
♥A 9 8 5
♦10
♣A 8 7 3
♠K 7 4 2
♥J 7
♦Q 3
♣K J 10 9 5
N
WE
S
♠A J 10
♥K
♦A K J 8 7 4
♣6 4 2
♠Q 9
♥Q 10 6 4 3 2
♦9 6 5 2
♣Q

EW 5♣; NS 3♥; EW 2♠; EW 3♦; Par −400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠W−31507.000.003-Waller-Johnson vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 ♠W−21005.501.502-Newel-Newel vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
4 ♦E−21005.501.505-Creede-Laquerriere vs 3-Winton-Daniels
2 ♠W21103.503.506-Layne-Macaulay vs 5-Huston-Holley
3 ♦E31103.503.5011-Sadler-Blanchard vs 4-Pash-Cohen
4 ♦E41302.005.007-Robinson-Kelley vs 7-Schubert-Levy
2 ♦E51501.006.004-Clark-Berry vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 NTW44300.007.001-Rogers-Rogers vs 6-Miller-Gullo

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul
♠K 5
♥J 9 5
♦Q J 10 2
♣A 6 5 4
♠6 3
♥A K 8
♦8 5
♣K Q J 9 8 2
N
WE
S
♠A J 9 4
♥6 3 2
♦A K 7 6 4
♣7
♠Q 10 8 7 2
♥Q 10 7 4
♦9 3
♣10 3

EW 4N; EW 4♣; EW 3♦; EW 1♠; EW 1♥; Par −630

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW−11007.000.004-Clark-Berry vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
3 ♣W41306.001.002-Newel-Newel vs 7-Schubert-Levy
2 NTE41804.502.505-Creede-Laquerriere vs 2-Coit-Miller
2 NTW41804.502.506-Layne-Macaulay vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 NTW46302.005.001-Rogers-Rogers vs 5-Huston-Holley
3 NTE46302.005.003-Waller-Johnson vs 9-High-Wiedel
3 NTW46302.005.007-Robinson-Kelley vs 6-Miller-Gullo
3 NTW56600.007.008-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul
♠9 8 4 2
♥K J 10 5 2
♦K J 7
♣J
♠7 5
♥6 3
♦Q 10 6 4 3
♣10 8 4 2
N
WE
S
♠A K J 10 6
♥8 4
♦A 9 8
♣6 5 3
♠Q 3
♥A Q 9 7
♦5 2
♣A K Q 9 7

NS 4♥; NS 3♣; NS 1N; N 1♠; Par +620

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥S56506.001.006-Layne-Macaulay vs 4-Pash-Cohen
4 ♥N56506.001.007-Robinson-Kelley vs 6-Miller-Gullo
4 ♥S56506.001.008-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
4 ♥N46202.504.501-Rogers-Rogers vs 5-Huston-Holley
4 ♥N46202.504.502-Newel-Newel vs 7-Schubert-Levy
4 ♥S46202.504.504-Clark-Berry vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
4 ♥S46202.504.505-Creede-Laquerriere vs 2-Coit-Miller
3 ♥N52000.007.003-Waller-Johnson vs 9-High-Wiedel

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul
♠K 8
♥8 5 4 3 2
♦10 9 5
♣A 10 3
♠Q 7 6 5 2
♥K Q 9 6
♦J 6
♣Q J
N
WE
S
♠10 9 3
♥A J
♦K 8 7 4
♣9 8 6 4
♠A J 4
♥10 7
♦A Q 3 2
♣K 7 5 2

S 3♥; NS 2N; N 2♥; NS 2♦; NS 2♣; S 1♠; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS31506.500.506-Layne-Macaulay vs 4-Pash-Cohen
3 ♠W−31506.500.508-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
2 NTS21204.502.501-Rogers-Rogers vs 5-Huston-Holley
1 NTS21204.502.502-Newel-Newel vs 7-Schubert-Levy
2 ♠W−1502.504.504-Clark-Berry vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
2 ♠W−1502.504.507-Robinson-Kelley vs 6-Miller-Gullo
1 ♠W1801.006.005-Creede-Laquerriere vs 2-Coit-Miller
2 ♠W21100.007.003-Waller-Johnson vs 9-High-Wiedel

Board 25
North Deals
E-W Vul
♠Q 3
♥6 4 3 2
♦K 6 4 2
♣K J 5
♠K 8
♥A K Q J 10 9 8 7
♦5 3
♣8
N
WE
S
♠9 7 5
♥5
♦10 9 8
♣A 10 6 4 3 2
♠A J 10 6 4 2
♥—
♦A Q J 7
♣Q 9 7

NS 5♠; EW 4♥; NS 4♦; EW 1N; NS 2♣; Par +450

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠S54507.000.008-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 7-Schubert-Levy
4 ♠S44206.001.009-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 9-High-Wiedel
5 ♥×W−12005.002.003-Waller-Johnson vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
5 ♥W−11004.003.002-Newel-Newel vs 6-Miller-Gullo
5 ♠S−1502.504.504-Clark-Berry vs 10-Myers-Myers
4 ♠S−1502.504.507-Robinson-Kelley vs 5-Huston-Holley
4 ♥W46200.506.505-Creede-Laquerriere vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 ♥W46200.506.506-Layne-Macaulay vs 3-Winton-Daniels

Board 26
East Deals
Both Vul
♠J 9 4
♥K J 4
♦K 10 9 5
♣A 8 2
♠A 10 5
♥A 9 5 3
♦Q 7 6 4 3
♣7
N
WE
S
♠Q 8 7 6 3 2
♥7 6
♦A J
♣10 6 5
♠K
♥Q 10 8 2
♦8 2
♣K Q J 9 4 3

EW 3♠; NS 3♣; NS 1N; NS 1♥; EW 1♦; Par −140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN36007.000.003-Waller-Johnson vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 ♦W−22006.001.009-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 9-High-Wiedel
2 ♥S41705.002.005-Creede-Laquerriere vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 ♣S31103.503.507-Robinson-Kelley vs 5-Huston-Holley
3 ♣S31103.503.508-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 7-Schubert-Levy
4 ♣S−11002.005.006-Layne-Macaulay vs 3-Winton-Daniels
3 NTN−22000.506.502-Newel-Newel vs 6-Miller-Gullo
2 ♠E52000.506.504-Clark-Berry vs 10-Myers-Myers

Board 27
South Deals
None Vul
♠J 8 4
♥A Q 6
♦3 2
♣9 8 6 5 3
♠A 10 3
♥10 3
♦K Q 10
♣A J 10 7 4
N
WE
S
♠Q 5
♥K 8 5 4
♦A 8 7 6 5
♣K 2
♠K 9 7 6 2
♥J 9 7 2
♦J 9 4
♣Q

EW 5N; EW 5♦; EW 3♥; EW 4♣; EW 1♠; Par −460

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♦E41307.000.005-Creede-Laquerriere vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 ♦E61706.001.003-Waller-Johnson vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
5 ♦E64204.502.504-Clark-Berry vs 10-Myers-Myers
5 ♦E64204.502.508-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 NTW44303.004.006-Layne-Macaulay vs 3-Winton-Daniels
3 NTW54601.505.502-Newel-Newel vs 6-Miller-Gullo
3 NTW54601.505.509-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 9-High-Wiedel
3 NTW75200.007.007-Robinson-Kelley vs 5-Huston-Holley

Board 28
West Deals
N-S Vul
♠7 6 5 2
♥Q 6 2
♦10 9 8 4
♣K 8
♠Q 9 8
♥J 9 8 5
♦A K Q
♣A J 5
N
WE
S
♠A J 10 4 3
♥3
♦J 7 2
♣10 6 4 2
♠K
♥A K 10 7 4
♦6 5 3
♣Q 9 7 3

EW 4♠; EW 3N; EW 3♣; EW 2♦; NS 1♥; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 ♠W21105.791.214-Clark-Berry vs 9-High-Wiedel
2 ♠W21105.791.215-Creede-Laquerriere vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
3 ♣E31105.791.219-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
2 ♠W31402.364.643-Waller-Johnson vs 7-Schubert-Levy
2 ♠W31402.364.646-Layne-Macaulay vs 2-Coit-Miller
2 ♠W31402.364.648-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 6-Miller-Gullo
4 ♥×S−38000.076.937-Robinson-Kelley vs 4-Pash-Cohen

Board 29
North Deals
Both Vul
♠Q 2
♥J 8 5
♦K J 8 2
♣A K 8 3
♠K J 3
♥6 4 2
♦A Q 9 6 5 4
♣2
N
WE
S
♠A 8 7
♥10 9 7
♦10 7 3
♣Q J 6 4
♠10 9 6 5 4
♥A K Q 3
♦—
♣10 9 7 5

NS 3♠; NS 3♥; NS 3♣; NS 1N; Par +140

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTN41806.360.645-Creede-Laquerriere vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
1 NTN41806.360.649-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
2 NTN21203.503.503-Waller-Johnson vs 7-Schubert-Levy
2 NTN21203.503.504-Clark-Berry vs 9-High-Wiedel
2 NTN21203.503.507-Robinson-Kelley vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 ♥N21101.215.796-Layne-Macaulay vs 2-Coit-Miller
3 NTN−22000.076.938-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 6-Miller-Gullo

Board 30
East Deals
None Vul
♠K Q 9 7
♥K
♦K 10 8 5 3
♣4 3 2
♠10 6 4
♥10 9 4 3
♦A 9 2
♣Q J 5
N
WE
S
♠J 8 5 3
♥A 7 5
♦Q J 6 4
♣8 6
♠A 2
♥Q J 8 6 2
♦7
♣A K 10 9 7

N 3N; NS 3♠; NS 3♥; NS 4♣; S 2N; NS 3♦; Par +400

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN34006.360.645-Creede-Laquerriere vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
3 NTN34006.360.647-Robinson-Kelley vs 4-Pash-Cohen
2 NTN31504.642.363-Waller-Johnson vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 NTN−1502.364.644-Clark-Berry vs 9-High-Wiedel
3 NTN−1502.364.646-Layne-Macaulay vs 2-Coit-Miller
3 NTS−1502.364.649-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 NTN−21000.076.938-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 6-Miller-Gullo

Board 31
South Deals
N-S Vul
♠9 2
♥K Q 7 5 2
♦Q 10 7 2
♣5 3
♠A Q 10 7 6
♥A 10 9 4
♦3
♣A 7 4
N
WE
S
♠3
♥J 8 6 3
♦A 9 5
♣K J 10 9 6
♠K J 8 5 4
♥—
♦K J 8 6 4
♣Q 8 2

EW 4♥; EW 3N; EW 5♣; EW 2♠; NS 1♦; Par −420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♥×E−11006.930.077-Robinson-Kelley vs 3-Winton-Daniels
5 ♣W−1505.791.219-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 ♦S−22004.642.366-Layne-Macaulay vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 ♦S−33002.934.078-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 5-Huston-Holley
4 ♦S−33002.934.0711-Sadler-Blanchard vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
3 NTW34001.215.795-Creede-Laquerriere vs 10-Myers-Myers
4 ♥W44200.076.934-Clark-Berry vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades

Board 32
West Deals
E-W Vul
♠A K Q 9 4 3 2
♥A 10 4
♦2
♣5 2
♠J 10
♥8
♦J 10 8 7 3
♣A K Q 7 6
N
WE
S
♠6 5
♥7 5 2
♦A Q 6 5
♣J 10 8 3
♠8 7
♥K Q J 9 6 3
♦K 9 4
♣9 4

NS 4♠; NS 4♥; EW 3♦; EW 3♣; NS 1N; Par +420

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠N75106.360.646-Layne-Macaulay vs 1-Noga-Hempel
4 ♠N75106.360.647-Robinson-Kelley vs 3-Winton-Daniels
4 ♠N54504.642.368-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 5-Huston-Holley
4 ♠N44203.503.509-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 NTS−1502.364.6411-Sadler-Blanchard vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
5 ♠×N−11000.646.364-Clark-Berry vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
6 ♠N−21000.646.365-Creede-Laquerriere vs 10-Myers-Myers

Board 33
North Deals
None Vul
♠A K J 10 6
♥A 5 3 2
♦J 10 4
♣K
♠8 7 4
♥10 9 4
♦A 6 5
♣10 7 6 3
N
WE
S
♠Q 5 3
♥Q J 8 6
♦9 7 3
♣J 9 4
♠9 2
♥K 7
♦K Q 8 2
♣A Q 8 5 2

NS 6♦; NS 5♠; NS 4N; NS 4♥; NS 5♣; Par +920

ContractByMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
   N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS54605.211.794-Clark-Berry vs 8-Harguindeguy-Smades
3 NTS54605.211.796-Layne-Macaulay vs 1-Noga-Hempel
3 NTN54605.211.798-Oakshott-Oakshott vs 5-Huston-Holley
3 NTS54605.211.799-Heisdorf-Gearhart vs 7-Schubert-Levy
3 NTN44302.364.645-Creede-Laquerriere vs 10-Myers-Myers
3 NTN34001.215.7911-Sadler-Blanchard vs 11-Petersen-Tingey
6 NTN−21000.076.937-Robinson-Kelley vs 3-Winton-Daniels